Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: Rationale and design

被引:28
|
作者
Lunny C. [1 ]
Brennan S.E. [1 ]
McDonald S. [1 ]
McKenzie J.E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash University, Australasian Cochrane Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 549 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, VIC
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Evidence map; Evidenced-based methods; Overviews of systematic reviews;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-015-0178-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Overviews of systematic reviews attempt to systematically retrieve and summarise the results of multiple systematic reviews into a single document. Methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of reviews are in their infancy. To date, there has been no systematic review or evidence map examining the range of methods for overviews nor of the evidence for using these methods. The objectives of the study are to develop and populate a framework of methods that have or may be used in conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions (stage I); create an evidence map of studies that have evaluated these methods (stage II); and identify and describe unique methodological challenges of overviews. Methods: The research will be undertaken in two stages. For both stages, we plan to search methods collections (e.g. Cochrane Methodology Register, Meth4ReSyn library, AHRQ Effective Health Care Program) to identify eligible studies. These searches will be supplemented by searching reference lists and citation searching. Stage I: Methods used in overviews will be identified from articles describing methods for overviews, methods studies examining a cross section/cohort of overviews, guidance documents and commentaries. The identified methods will populate a framework of available methods for conducting an overview. Two reviewers will independently code included studies to develop the framework. Thematic analysis of the coded data will be used to categorise and describe methods. Stage II: Evaluations of the performance of methods will be identified from systematic reviews of methods studies and methods studies. Evaluations will be described and mapped to the framework of methods identified in stage I. Discussion: The results of this process will be useful for mapping of methods for overviews of systematic reviews, informing guidance and identifying and prioritising method research in this field. © 2016 Lunny et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing, and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review
    Iannizzi, Claire
    Akl, Elie A.
    Anslinger, Eva
    Weibel, Stephanie
    Kahale, Lara A.
    Aminat, Abina Mosunmola
    Piechotta, Vanessa
    Skoetz, Nicole
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [12] Appraisal methods and outcomes of AMSTAR 2 assessments in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions in the cardiovascular field: A methodological study
    Karakasis, Paschalis
    Bougioukas, Konstantinos I.
    Pamporis, Konstantinos
    Fragakis, Nikolaos
    Haidich, Anna-Bettina
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2024, 15 (02) : 213 - 226
  • [13] Methods for conducting systematic reviews of evidence on effectiveness and economic efficiency of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers
    Baron, Roy C.
    Rimer, Barbara K.
    Coates, Ralph J.
    Kerner, Jon
    Mullen, Patricia Dolan
    Chattopadhyay, Sajal
    Briss, Peter A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (01) : S26 - S33
  • [14] Evaluating the evidence: a systematic review of reviews of the effectiveness and safety of digital interventions for ADHD
    Elia Gabarron
    Kerstin Denecke
    Guillermo Lopez-Campos
    BMC Psychiatry, 25 (1)
  • [15] Methods of Evidence-Based Anatomy: a guide to conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of anatomical studies
    Henry, Brandon Michael
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
    Walocha, Jerzy A.
    ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2016, 205 : 16 - 21
  • [16] Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence
    Quan Nha Hong
    Pierre Pluye
    Mathieu Bujold
    Maggy Wassef
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [17] Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence
    Quan Nha Hong
    Pluye, Pierre
    Bujold, Mathieu
    Wassef, Maggy
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6 : 61
  • [18] An Evidence Map for Interventions Addressing Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Hart, Laura C.
    Patel-Nguyen, Sonya, V
    Merkley, Meredith G.
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2019, 48 : 18 - 34
  • [19] Reporting quality and risk of bias in JBI systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of interventions: a methodological review protocol
    Grammatopoulos, Tahlia
    Hunter, Jeremy W. S.
    Munn, Zachary
    Stone, Jennifer C.
    Barker, Timothy Hugh
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (03) : 584 - 591
  • [20] Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references
    Sandra McKeown
    Zuhaib M. Mir
    Systematic Reviews, 10