Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: Rationale and design

被引:28
|
作者
Lunny C. [1 ]
Brennan S.E. [1 ]
McDonald S. [1 ]
McKenzie J.E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash University, Australasian Cochrane Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 549 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, VIC
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Evidence map; Evidenced-based methods; Overviews of systematic reviews;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-015-0178-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Overviews of systematic reviews attempt to systematically retrieve and summarise the results of multiple systematic reviews into a single document. Methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of reviews are in their infancy. To date, there has been no systematic review or evidence map examining the range of methods for overviews nor of the evidence for using these methods. The objectives of the study are to develop and populate a framework of methods that have or may be used in conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions (stage I); create an evidence map of studies that have evaluated these methods (stage II); and identify and describe unique methodological challenges of overviews. Methods: The research will be undertaken in two stages. For both stages, we plan to search methods collections (e.g. Cochrane Methodology Register, Meth4ReSyn library, AHRQ Effective Health Care Program) to identify eligible studies. These searches will be supplemented by searching reference lists and citation searching. Stage I: Methods used in overviews will be identified from articles describing methods for overviews, methods studies examining a cross section/cohort of overviews, guidance documents and commentaries. The identified methods will populate a framework of available methods for conducting an overview. Two reviewers will independently code included studies to develop the framework. Thematic analysis of the coded data will be used to categorise and describe methods. Stage II: Evaluations of the performance of methods will be identified from systematic reviews of methods studies and methods studies. Evaluations will be described and mapped to the framework of methods identified in stage I. Discussion: The results of this process will be useful for mapping of methods for overviews of systematic reviews, informing guidance and identifying and prioritising method research in this field. © 2016 Lunny et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
    Liberati, Alessandro
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer
    Mulrow, Cynthia
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Clarke, Mike
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Moher, David
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (04) : W65 - W94
  • [32] The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
    Liberati, Alessandro
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer
    Mulrow, Cynthia
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Clarke, Mike
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Moher, David
    EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 6 (04) : 354 - 391
  • [33] The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
    Liberati, Alessandro
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer
    Mulrow, Cynthia
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Clarke, Mike
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Moher, David
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2009, 6 (07)
  • [34] Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health and rights: an evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews
    Ruane-McAteer, Eimear
    Amin, Avni
    Hanratty, Jennifer
    Lynn, Fiona
    van Willenswaard, Kyrsten Corbijn
    Reid, Esther
    Khosla, Rajat
    Lohan, Maria
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (05):
  • [35] Interventions addressing men, masculinities, and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health and rights: An evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews
    Ruane-McAteer, Eimear
    Amin, Avni
    Hanratty, Jennifer
    Lynn, Fiona
    van Willenswaard, Kyrsten Corbijn
    Reid, Esther
    Khosla, Rajat
    Lohan, Maria
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 37 (05) : 10 - 10
  • [36] The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
    Page, Matthew J.
    Moher, David
    Brennan, Sue
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [37] The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
    Matthew J. Page
    David Moher
    Sue Brennan
    Joanne E. McKenzie
    Systematic Reviews, 12
  • [38] Interventions, methods and outcome measures used in teaching evidence-based practice to healthcare students: an overview of systematic reviews
    Nielsen, Lea D.
    Lowe, Mette M.
    Mansilla, Francisco
    Jorgensen, Rene B.
    Ramachandran, Asviny
    Noe, Bodil B.
    Egebaek, Heidi K.
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [39] The Importance of Reporting Biases in Patient Care: Can We Trust the Evidence From Either Individual Studies or Systematic Reviews?
    Dickersin, Kay
    Qureshi, Riaz
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 169 (06) : 413 - +
  • [40] Interventions, methods and outcome measures used in teaching evidence-based practice to healthcare students: an overview of systematic reviews
    Lea D. Nielsen
    Mette M. Løwe
    Francisco Mansilla
    Rene B. Jørgensen
    Asviny Ramachandran
    Bodil B. Noe
    Heidi K. Egebæk
    BMC Medical Education, 24