Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions

被引:44
|
作者
Bougioukas, Konstantinos I. [1 ]
Bouras, Emmanouil [1 ]
Apostolidou-Kiouti, Fani [1 ]
Kokkali, Stamatia [1 ]
Arvanitidou, Malamatenia [1 ]
Haidich, Anna-Bettina [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hyg Social Prevent Med & Med Stat, Univ Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Abstract; Checklist; Overview of systematic reviews; PRIO for abstracts; PRIO-Harms; Reporting guidelines; HARMS; RISK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: An overview of systematic reviews (OoSRs) is a study designed to offer a broad view of evidence from existing systematic reviews (SRs). The abstract is an important part of an OoSRs as it can determine whether reading the full text is of interest. The aim of this article is to offer guidelines to promote transparent and sufficient reporting in abstracts of OoSRs of health care interventions. Study Design and Setting: The items were developed by combining key features from abstracts of OoSRs, PRISMA for abstracts, and our published reporting guidelines for OoSRs. The initial version was distributed to experts to give feedback; pilot testing by a group of researchers followed. The refined checklist was applied by two reviewers independently in a sample of 40 abstracts. Results: The developed instrument "Preferred Reporting Items for OoSRs abstracts" (PRIO for abstracts) consists of six sections with 15 topics including 20 items in total. The mean inter-rater reliability was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.82, 0.92). An explanation and at least one published example of good reporting per item are provided. Conclusion: This instrument will assist authors in writing transparent and informative abstracts for OoSRs and can be adopted by journals that publish OoSRs. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 79
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012–2016: protocol for a systematic review
    Dawid Pieper
    Michelle Pollock
    Ricardo M. Fernandes
    Roland Brian Büchter
    Lisa Hartling
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [2] Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: Rationale and design
    Lunny C.
    Brennan S.E.
    McDonald S.
    McKenzie J.E.
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [3] Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012-2016: protocol for a systematic review
    Pieper, Dawid
    Pollock, Michelle
    Fernandes, Ricardo M.
    Buechter, Roland Brian
    Hartling, Lisa
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [4] SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS - REPORTING, UPDATING, AND CORRECTING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF THE EFFECTS OF HEALTH-CARE
    CHALMERS, I
    HAYNES, B
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6958): : 862 - 865
  • [5] Bibliometric study of 'overviews of systematic reviews' of health interventions: Evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor
    Lunny, Carole
    Neelakant, Trish
    Chen, Alyssa
    Shinger, Gavindeep
    Stevens, Adrienne
    Tasnim, Sara
    Sadeghipouya, Shadi
    Adams, Stephen
    Zheng, Yi Wen
    Lin, Lester
    Yang, Pei Hsuan
    Dosanjh, Manpreet
    Ngsee, Peter
    Ellis, Ursula
    Shea, Beverley J.
    Reid, Emma K.
    Wright, James M.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2022, 13 (01) : 109 - 120
  • [6] How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions
    Welch, Vivian
    Dewidar, Omar
    Ghogomu, Elizabeth Tanjong
    Abdisalam, Salman
    Al Ameer, Abdulah
    Barbeau, Victoria, I
    Brand, Kevin
    Kebedom, Kisanet
    Benkhalti, Maria
    Kristjansson, Elizabeth
    Madani, Mohamad Tarek
    Martin, Alba M. Antequera
    Mathew, Christine M.
    McGowan, Jessie
    McLeod, William
    Park, Hanbyoul Agatha
    Petkovic, Jennifer
    Riddle, Alison
    Tugwell, Peter
    Petticrew, Mark
    Trawin, Jessica
    Wells, George A.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (01):
  • [7] How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions
    Welch, Vivian
    Tugwell, Peter
    Petticrew, Mark
    de Montigny, Joanne
    Ueffing, Erin
    Kristjansson, Betsy
    McGowan, Jessie
    Jandu, Maria Benkhalti
    Wells, George A.
    Brand, Kevin
    Smylie, Janet
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (12):
  • [8] Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
    Golder S.
    McIntosh H.M.
    Loke Y.
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (1)
  • [9] Health Literacy Interventions in cancer care: A review of systematic reviews
    Jeitani, C.
    Van den Broucke, S.
    Leemans, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [10] Reporting of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews of public health interventions: a methodological assessment
    Campbell, Mhairi
    Thomson, Hilary
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Sowden, Amanda
    LANCET, 2016, 388 : 34 - 34