Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions

被引:44
|
作者
Bougioukas, Konstantinos I. [1 ]
Bouras, Emmanouil [1 ]
Apostolidou-Kiouti, Fani [1 ]
Kokkali, Stamatia [1 ]
Arvanitidou, Malamatenia [1 ]
Haidich, Anna-Bettina [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hyg Social Prevent Med & Med Stat, Univ Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Abstract; Checklist; Overview of systematic reviews; PRIO for abstracts; PRIO-Harms; Reporting guidelines; HARMS; RISK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: An overview of systematic reviews (OoSRs) is a study designed to offer a broad view of evidence from existing systematic reviews (SRs). The abstract is an important part of an OoSRs as it can determine whether reading the full text is of interest. The aim of this article is to offer guidelines to promote transparent and sufficient reporting in abstracts of OoSRs of health care interventions. Study Design and Setting: The items were developed by combining key features from abstracts of OoSRs, PRISMA for abstracts, and our published reporting guidelines for OoSRs. The initial version was distributed to experts to give feedback; pilot testing by a group of researchers followed. The refined checklist was applied by two reviewers independently in a sample of 40 abstracts. Results: The developed instrument "Preferred Reporting Items for OoSRs abstracts" (PRIO for abstracts) consists of six sections with 15 topics including 20 items in total. The mean inter-rater reliability was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.82, 0.92). An explanation and at least one published example of good reporting per item are provided. Conclusion: This instrument will assist authors in writing transparent and informative abstracts for OoSRs and can be adopted by journals that publish OoSRs. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 79
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving the quality of health care through practice guidelines: to what extent systematic reviews support health policy?
    Stivanello, Elisa
    Grilli, Roberto
    EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 3 (02): : 34 - 37
  • [32] The new United Nations approach to sustainable development post-2015: Findings from four overviews of systematic reviews on interventions for sustainable development and health
    Galvao, Luiz A. C.
    Haby, Michelle M.
    Chapman, Evelina
    Clark, Rachel
    Camara, Volney Magalhaes
    Luiz, Ronir Raggio
    Becerra-Posada, Francisco
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 39 (03): : 157 - 165
  • [33] Interventions to reduce the incidence of medical error and its financial burden in health care systems: A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Ahsani-Estahbanati, Ehsan
    Sergeevich Gordeev, Vladimir
    Doshmangir, Leila
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [34] Effectiveness of multifactorial interventions in primary health care settings for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Alvarez-Bueno, Celia
    Cavero-Redondo, Ivan
    Martinez-Andres, Maria
    Arias-Palencia, Natalia
    Ramos-Blanes, Rafael
    Salcedo-Aguilar, Fernando
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 76 : S68 - S75
  • [35] Evidence for Global Health Care Interventions for Preterm or Low Birth Weight Infants: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Edmond, Karen
    Strobel, Natalie
    PEDIATRICS, 2022, 150
  • [36] Public Reporting in Health Care: How Do Consumers Use Quality-of-Care Information? A Systematic Review
    Faber, Marian
    Bosch, Marije
    Wollersheim, Hub
    Leatherman, Sheila
    Grol, Richard
    MEDICAL CARE, 2009, 47 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [37] METHODOLOGIC GUIDELINES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS IN HEALTH-CARE FROM THE POTSDAM CONSULTATION ON METAANALYSIS
    COOK, DJ
    SACKETT, DL
    SPITZER, WO
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (01) : 167 - 171
  • [38] Special issue: The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, maintaining, and promoting the accessibility of systematic reviews of health care interventions - Introduction
    Bausell, RB
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2002, 25 (01) : 5 - 7
  • [39] How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews
    Aust, Birgit
    Moller, Jeppe Lykke
    Nordentoft, Mads
    Frydendall, Karen Bo
    Bengtsen, Elizabeth
    Jensen, Andreas Brigger
    Garde, Anne Helene
    Kompier, Michiel
    Semmer, Norbert
    Rugulies, Reiner
    Jaspers, Sofie Ostergaard
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2023, 49 (05) : 315 - 329
  • [40] Evaluating complex interventions in End of Life Care: the MORECare Statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews
    Irene J Higginson
    Catherine J Evans
    Gunn Grande
    Nancy Preston
    Myfanwy Morgan
    Paul McCrone
    Penney Lewis
    Peter Fayers
    Richard Harding
    Matthew Hotopf
    Scott A Murray
    Hamid Benalia
    Marjolein Gysels
    Morag Farquhar
    Chris Todd
    BMC Medicine, 11