Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions

被引:44
|
作者
Bougioukas, Konstantinos I. [1 ]
Bouras, Emmanouil [1 ]
Apostolidou-Kiouti, Fani [1 ]
Kokkali, Stamatia [1 ]
Arvanitidou, Malamatenia [1 ]
Haidich, Anna-Bettina [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hyg Social Prevent Med & Med Stat, Univ Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Abstract; Checklist; Overview of systematic reviews; PRIO for abstracts; PRIO-Harms; Reporting guidelines; HARMS; RISK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: An overview of systematic reviews (OoSRs) is a study designed to offer a broad view of evidence from existing systematic reviews (SRs). The abstract is an important part of an OoSRs as it can determine whether reading the full text is of interest. The aim of this article is to offer guidelines to promote transparent and sufficient reporting in abstracts of OoSRs of health care interventions. Study Design and Setting: The items were developed by combining key features from abstracts of OoSRs, PRISMA for abstracts, and our published reporting guidelines for OoSRs. The initial version was distributed to experts to give feedback; pilot testing by a group of researchers followed. The refined checklist was applied by two reviewers independently in a sample of 40 abstracts. Results: The developed instrument "Preferred Reporting Items for OoSRs abstracts" (PRIO for abstracts) consists of six sections with 15 topics including 20 items in total. The mean inter-rater reliability was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.82, 0.92). An explanation and at least one published example of good reporting per item are provided. Conclusion: This instrument will assist authors in writing transparent and informative abstracts for OoSRs and can be adopted by journals that publish OoSRs. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 79
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality assessment of systematic reviews of health care interventions using AMSTAR.
    Jagannath V.
    Mathew J.L.
    Asokan G.V.
    Fedorowicz Z.
    Indian Pediatrics, 2011, 48 (5) : 383 - 385
  • [22] Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions
    Viswanathan, Meera
    Patnode, Carrie D.
    Berkman, Nancy D.
    Bass, Eric B.
    Chang, Stephanie
    Hartling, Lisa
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Treadwell, Jonathan R.
    Kane, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 97 : 26 - 34
  • [23] Generalizability of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of health care interventions to primary health care: concepts, methods and future research
    Nasser, Mona
    van Weel, Chris
    van Binsbergen, Jaap J.
    van de Laar, Floris A.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2012, 29 : i94 - i103
  • [24] What are 'psychosocial interventions' and how might they improve health? An international review of systematic reviews
    Egan, M
    Petticrew, M
    Tannahill, C
    Hanlon, P
    Kearns, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 15 : 99 - 100
  • [25] Reporting Guidelines and the American Journal of Public Health's Adoption of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    McLeroy, Kenneth R.
    Northridge, Mary E.
    Balcazar, Hector
    Greenberg, Michael R.
    Landers, Stewart J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 102 (05) : 780 - 784
  • [26] Interventions to Modify Health Care Provider Adherence to Asthma Guidelines: A Systematic Review
    Okelo, Sande O.
    Butz, Arlene M.
    Sharma, Ritu
    Diette, Gregory B.
    Pitts, Samantha I.
    King, Tracy M.
    Linn, Shauna T.
    Reuben, Manisha
    Chelladurai, Yohalakshmi
    Robinson, Karen A.
    PEDIATRICS, 2013, 132 (03) : 517 - 534
  • [27] Health care interventions delivered over the Internet: How systematic was the review?
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (02)
  • [28] Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
    Golder, Su
    Loke, Yoon K.
    Wright, Kath
    Norman, Gill
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (09)
  • [29] Inclusion of nonrandomized studies of interventions in systematic reviews of interventions: updated guidance from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Effective Health Care program
    Saldanha, Ian J.
    Adam, Gaelen P.
    Banez, Lionel L.
    Bass, Eric B.
    Berliner, Elise
    Devine, Beth
    Hammarlund, Noah
    Jain, Anjali
    Norris, Susan L.
    Skelly, Andrea C.
    Vander Ley, Kelly
    Wang, Zhen
    Wilt, Timothy J.
    Viswanathan, Meera
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 152 : 300 - 306
  • [30] Patient- and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: A review of systematic reviews
    Park, Myonghwa
    Thi-Thanh-Tinh Giap
    Lee, Mihyun
    Jeong, Hyun
    Jeong, Miri
    Go, Younghye
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2018, 87 : 69 - 83