Inclusive approaches to involvement of community groups in health research: the co-produced CHICO guidance

被引:6
|
作者
Jameson C. [1 ,2 ]
Haq Z. [3 ]
Musse S. [4 ]
Kosar Z. [4 ]
Watson G. [5 ]
Wylde V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol
[2] NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol
[3] Dhek Bhal, Wellspring Settlement, Barton Hill, Bristol
[4] My Friday Coffee Morning – Barton Hill, University of Bristol micro campus, Barton Hill, Bristol
[5] Malcolm X Elders, Malcolm X Community Centre, St Pauls, Bristol
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Community groups; Diversity; Ethnic groups; Guidance; Health research; Involvement;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-023-00492-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Racially marginalised groups are underserved in healthcare and underrepresented in health research. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is established as the method to ensure equity in health research. However, methods traditionally employed in PPIE can lead to the exclusion of some communities and exacerbation of existing inequalities, highlighting the need to develop inclusive processes for more inclusive community involvement in health research. We aimed to produce guidance to promote good practice for inclusive involvement of racially marginalised community groups in health research via public and community involvement and engagement. Methods: The CHecklist for Inclusive COmmunity involvement in health research (CHICO) was co-produced by researchers and three Bristol-based community organisations: Dhek Bhal, My Friday Coffee Morning—Barton Hill, and Malcolm X Elders. After initial conversations and link building with community leaders to develop relationships, researchers attended at least three meetings with each community group to discuss preferred approaches to involvement. Each community group had a different format, and discussions were open and tailored to fit the groups preferences. The meetings were held in the community groups’ usual meeting venue. Notes from meetings were reviewed by researchers to identify key themes, which were used to inform the creation of a draft illustration which was then taken back to the community groups for refinement and used to inform the development of written guidance and the final illustration. Results: Checklist items were structured into three stages: (1) building relationships, (2) reciprocal relationships and (3) practicalities. Stage 1 highlights the importance of building trust with the community group over time through regular visits to community venues and talking to people informally to understand the history of the group, their preferences and needs, and topics that are likely to be of interest to them. Stage 2 focusses on maintaining a reciprocal relationship and understanding how to best to give back to the community. Stage 3 provides guidance on the practicalities of designing and running inclusive community-based involvement activities, including consideration of the venue, format, communication-style, language requirements, social activities, and provision of food. Conclusions: Our co-produced checklist can guide researchers in how to involve people from different ethnicities in health research that is relevant to their community. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How ecosystem services are co-produced: a critical review identifying multiple research framings
    Woodhead, A. J.
    Kenter, J. O.
    Thomas, C. D.
    Stringer, L. C.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2025, 71
  • [42] How to talk to young people about their mental health: a co-produced psychoeducation video
    Jessica Radley
    Annie Burge
    Ruby Brown
    Natalie Kashirsky
    Katharine Boyd
    Julia Dabrowski
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 10 (1)
  • [43] Building capacity to engage in co-produced research: reflections from a digital storytelling project
    Harris, Paul
    Ellem, Kathy
    Gallagher, Hilary
    Burgess, Ashley
    Abson, Louise
    Sunderland, Naomi
    DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2024, 39 (05) : 1256 - 1275
  • [44] When Medicine Meets Media: How Health News is Co-produced Between Health and Media Professionals
    Stroobant, Joyce
    Van den Bogaert, Sarah
    Raeymaeckers, Karin
    JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2019, 20 (13) : 1828 - 1845
  • [45] Stakeholder perspectives of a co-produced intervention to integrate mental health for children and youth within the community sub-system in South Africa
    Vostanis, Panos
    Haffejee, Sadiyya
    Mwanda, Anita
    O'Reilly, Michelle
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2024, 158
  • [46] Healthy Living and Co-Production: Evaluation of Processes and Outcomes of a Health Promotion Initiative Co-Produced with Adolescents
    De Rosis, Sabina
    Pennucci, Francesca
    Noto, Guido
    Nuti, Sabina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) : 1 - 19
  • [47] COVID VOICES: CO-PRODUCED RESEARCH TO EXPLORE THE SHIELDING EXPERIENCES OF PEOPLE WITH INFLAMMATORY MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE
    Fox, Joyce
    Laidlaw, Lynn
    Dixon, William G.
    Sanders, Caroline
    Sharp, Charlotte A.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 61
  • [48] Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research
    Tembo, Doreen
    Hickey, Gary
    Montenegro, Cristian
    Chandler, David
    Nelson, Erica
    Porter, Katie
    Dikomitis, Lisa
    Chambers, Mary
    Chimbari, Moses
    Mumba, Noni
    Beresford, Peter
    Ekiikina, Peter O.
    Musesengwa, Rosemary
    Staniszewska, Sophie
    Coldham, Tina
    Rennard, Una
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [49] Finding the words to work together: developing a research design to explore risk and adult protection in co-produced research
    Brookes, Ian
    Archibald, Sylvia
    McInnes, Kerry
    Cross, Beth
    Daniel, Brigid
    Johnson, Fiona
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2012, 40 (02) : 143 - 151
  • [50] Reflections on the benefits and challenges of using co-produced artistic workshops to engage with young people in community settings
    Laura Tinner
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 10 (1)