Inclusive approaches to involvement of community groups in health research: the co-produced CHICO guidance

被引:6
|
作者
Jameson C. [1 ,2 ]
Haq Z. [3 ]
Musse S. [4 ]
Kosar Z. [4 ]
Watson G. [5 ]
Wylde V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol
[2] NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol
[3] Dhek Bhal, Wellspring Settlement, Barton Hill, Bristol
[4] My Friday Coffee Morning – Barton Hill, University of Bristol micro campus, Barton Hill, Bristol
[5] Malcolm X Elders, Malcolm X Community Centre, St Pauls, Bristol
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Community groups; Diversity; Ethnic groups; Guidance; Health research; Involvement;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-023-00492-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Racially marginalised groups are underserved in healthcare and underrepresented in health research. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is established as the method to ensure equity in health research. However, methods traditionally employed in PPIE can lead to the exclusion of some communities and exacerbation of existing inequalities, highlighting the need to develop inclusive processes for more inclusive community involvement in health research. We aimed to produce guidance to promote good practice for inclusive involvement of racially marginalised community groups in health research via public and community involvement and engagement. Methods: The CHecklist for Inclusive COmmunity involvement in health research (CHICO) was co-produced by researchers and three Bristol-based community organisations: Dhek Bhal, My Friday Coffee Morning—Barton Hill, and Malcolm X Elders. After initial conversations and link building with community leaders to develop relationships, researchers attended at least three meetings with each community group to discuss preferred approaches to involvement. Each community group had a different format, and discussions were open and tailored to fit the groups preferences. The meetings were held in the community groups’ usual meeting venue. Notes from meetings were reviewed by researchers to identify key themes, which were used to inform the creation of a draft illustration which was then taken back to the community groups for refinement and used to inform the development of written guidance and the final illustration. Results: Checklist items were structured into three stages: (1) building relationships, (2) reciprocal relationships and (3) practicalities. Stage 1 highlights the importance of building trust with the community group over time through regular visits to community venues and talking to people informally to understand the history of the group, their preferences and needs, and topics that are likely to be of interest to them. Stage 2 focusses on maintaining a reciprocal relationship and understanding how to best to give back to the community. Stage 3 provides guidance on the practicalities of designing and running inclusive community-based involvement activities, including consideration of the venue, format, communication-style, language requirements, social activities, and provision of food. Conclusions: Our co-produced checklist can guide researchers in how to involve people from different ethnicities in health research that is relevant to their community. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Community geography for precarious researchers: examining the intricacies of mutually beneficial and co-produced knowledge
    Emily Barrett
    Amber J. Bosse
    GeoJournal, 2022, 87 : 159 - 170
  • [32] COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT IN MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH
    Miller, Robert
    Hughes, Frances
    Soosay, Ian
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 45 : A12 - A13
  • [33] Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study
    Trevillion, Kylee
    Stuart, Ruth
    Ocloo, Josephine
    Broeckelmann, Eva
    Jeffreys, Stephen
    Jeynes, Tamar
    Allen, Dawn
    Russell, Jessica
    Billings, Jo
    Crawford, Mike J.
    Dale, Oliver
    Haigh, Rex
    Moran, Paul
    McNicholas, Shirley
    Nicholls, Vicky
    Foye, Una
    Simpson, Alan
    Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
    Johnson, Sonia
    Oram, Sian
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [34] Making the invisible visible in International Relations: Film, co-produced research and transnational feminism
    Harman, Sophie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2018, 24 (04) : 791 - 813
  • [35] Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study
    Kylee Trevillion
    Ruth Stuart
    Josephine Ocloo
    Eva Broeckelmann
    Stephen Jeffreys
    Tamar Jeynes
    Dawn Allen
    Jessica Russell
    Jo Billings
    Mike J. Crawford
    Oliver Dale
    Rex Haigh
    Paul Moran
    Shirley McNicholas
    Vicky Nicholls
    Una Foye
    Alan Simpson
    Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
    Sonia Johnson
    Sian Oram
    BMC Psychiatry, 22
  • [36] Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes: a co-produced research agenda
    Eaton W.M.
    Burnham M.
    Robertson T.
    Arbuckle J.G.
    Brasier K.J.
    Burbach M.E.
    Church S.P.
    Hart-Fredeluces G.
    Jackson-Smith D.
    Wildermuth G.
    Canfield K.N.
    Córdova S.C.
    Chatelain C.D.
    Fowler L.B.
    Hendawy M.M.Z.A.
    Kirchhoff C.J.
    Manheim M.K.
    Martinez R.O.
    Mook A.
    Mullin C.A.
    Murrah-Hanson A.L.
    Onabola C.O.
    Parker L.E.
    Redd E.A.
    Schelly C.
    Schoon M.L.
    Sigler W.A.
    Smit E.
    van Huysen T.
    Worosz M.R.
    Eberly C.
    Rogers A.
    Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2022, 4 (4) : 283 - 304
  • [37] From poverty to life chances: framing co-produced research in the Productive Margins programme
    Cohen, Sue
    Herbert, Allan
    Evans, Nathan
    Samzelius, Tove
    IMPACT OF CO-PRODUCTION: FROM COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TO SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2017, : 61 - 84
  • [38] Challenges in co-produced dementia research: A critical perspective and discussion to inform future directions
    Warran, Katey
    Greenwood, Frankie
    Ashworth, Rosalie
    Robertson, Martin
    Brown, Paula
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 38 (09)
  • [39] Peer researchers’ experiences of a co-produced research project on supported decision-making
    Webb P.
    Falls D.
    Keenan F.
    Norris B.
    Owens A.
    Davidson G.
    Edge R.
    Kelly B.
    McLaughlin A.
    Montgomery L.
    Mulvenna C.
    Irvine R.S.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 8 (1)
  • [40] The psychology of Gaelic games: a co-produced scoping review to inform research, policy, and practice
    Jackman, Patricia C.
    Lane, Aoife
    Wells, Nicole
    Kirby, Kate
    Bird, Matthew D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 22 (09) : 2234 - 2258