Inclusive approaches to involvement of community groups in health research: the co-produced CHICO guidance

被引:6
|
作者
Jameson C. [1 ,2 ]
Haq Z. [3 ]
Musse S. [4 ]
Kosar Z. [4 ]
Watson G. [5 ]
Wylde V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol
[2] NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol
[3] Dhek Bhal, Wellspring Settlement, Barton Hill, Bristol
[4] My Friday Coffee Morning – Barton Hill, University of Bristol micro campus, Barton Hill, Bristol
[5] Malcolm X Elders, Malcolm X Community Centre, St Pauls, Bristol
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Community groups; Diversity; Ethnic groups; Guidance; Health research; Involvement;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-023-00492-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Racially marginalised groups are underserved in healthcare and underrepresented in health research. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is established as the method to ensure equity in health research. However, methods traditionally employed in PPIE can lead to the exclusion of some communities and exacerbation of existing inequalities, highlighting the need to develop inclusive processes for more inclusive community involvement in health research. We aimed to produce guidance to promote good practice for inclusive involvement of racially marginalised community groups in health research via public and community involvement and engagement. Methods: The CHecklist for Inclusive COmmunity involvement in health research (CHICO) was co-produced by researchers and three Bristol-based community organisations: Dhek Bhal, My Friday Coffee Morning—Barton Hill, and Malcolm X Elders. After initial conversations and link building with community leaders to develop relationships, researchers attended at least three meetings with each community group to discuss preferred approaches to involvement. Each community group had a different format, and discussions were open and tailored to fit the groups preferences. The meetings were held in the community groups’ usual meeting venue. Notes from meetings were reviewed by researchers to identify key themes, which were used to inform the creation of a draft illustration which was then taken back to the community groups for refinement and used to inform the development of written guidance and the final illustration. Results: Checklist items were structured into three stages: (1) building relationships, (2) reciprocal relationships and (3) practicalities. Stage 1 highlights the importance of building trust with the community group over time through regular visits to community venues and talking to people informally to understand the history of the group, their preferences and needs, and topics that are likely to be of interest to them. Stage 2 focusses on maintaining a reciprocal relationship and understanding how to best to give back to the community. Stage 3 provides guidance on the practicalities of designing and running inclusive community-based involvement activities, including consideration of the venue, format, communication-style, language requirements, social activities, and provision of food. Conclusions: Our co-produced checklist can guide researchers in how to involve people from different ethnicities in health research that is relevant to their community. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the Acceptability of a Co-Produced Long COVID Intervention in an Underserved Community in the UK
    Fowler-Davis, Sally
    Young, Rachel
    Maden-Wilkinson, Tom
    Hameed, Waqas
    Dracas, Elizabeth
    Hurrell, Eleanor
    Bahl, Romila
    Kilcourse, Elisabeth
    Robinson, Rebecca
    Copeland, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (24)
  • [22] An auto-ethnographic study of co-produced health research in a patient organisation: unpacking the good, the bad, and the unspoken
    Astrid Janssens
    Danielle Drachmann
    Kristy Barnes-Cullen
    Austin Carrigg
    Henrik Thybo Christesen
    Becky Futers
    Yvette Ollada Lavery
    Tiffany Palms
    Jacob Sten Petersen
    Pratik Shah
    Paul Thornton
    Joseph Wolfsdorf
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 10 (1)
  • [23] Four Methodological Guidelines to Evaluate the Research Impact of Co-produced Climate Services
    Englund, Mathilda
    Andre, Karin
    Swartling, Asa Gerger
    Iao-Jorgensen, Jenny
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2022, 4
  • [24] Building trust and increasing inclusion in public health research: co-produced strategies for engaging UK ethnic minority communities in research
    Gafari, O.
    Bahrami-Hessari, M.
    Norton, J.
    Parmar, R.
    Hudson, M.
    Ndegwa, L.
    Agyapong-Badu, S.
    Asante, K. P.
    Alwan, N. A.
    McDonough, S.
    Tully, M. A.
    Calder, P. C.
    Barker, M.
    Stokes, M.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 233 : 90 - 99
  • [25] A CO-PRODUCED STUDY EXPLORING THE EXPERIENCES, SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE OF PEOPLE LIVING WITH FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER IN HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SETTINGS
    Gill, K.
    River, J.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 56 (1_SUPPL): : 86 - 87
  • [26] Leadership and the hidden politics of co-produced research: a Q-methodology study
    Durose, Catherine
    Perry, Beth
    Richardson, Liz
    Dean, Rikki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2023, 26 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [27] Development of a co-produced tool for monitoring and supporting the mental health of young people
    MacKeith, Joy
    Good, Anna
    Burns, Sara
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2021, 7 : S267 - S267
  • [28] Making space for co-produced research "impact': learning from a participatory action research casestudy
    Darby, Stella
    AREA, 2017, 49 (02) : 230 - 237
  • [29] Impact of a Co-produced Initiative for Mental Health Programming at a Canadian Psychiatric Hospital
    Martin K.
    Arbour S.
    Stevens A.
    Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, 2019, 6 (2) : 131 - 140
  • [30] Community geography for precarious researchers: examining the intricacies of mutually beneficial and co-produced knowledge
    Barrett, Emily
    Bosse, Amber J.
    GEOJOURNAL, 2022, 87 (SUPPL 2) : 159 - 170