Quantifying the advantages of TRIZ in sustainability through life cycle assessment

被引:31
|
作者
Spreafico, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergamo, Dept Management Informat & Prod Engn, Via Marconi 5, I-24044 Dalmine, Bg, Italy
关键词
TRIZ; Eco-design; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Literature review; COMPARATIVE LCA; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; WASTE TREATMENT; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; INTEGRATING TRIZ; WIND TURBINE; ECO-DESIGN; RICE HUSK; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126955
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper provides a quantitative evaluation of how much the application of the main TRIZ (Russian acronym for Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) strategies resulted in an increase of the sustainability of different devices by reducing their environmental impacts. The used dataset consists of 144 case studies of Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) extracted from 119 scientific articles. They were manually analysed and classified by analogy according to the TRIZ strategies. These latter deal with "Dematerialization of the device" through an increased involvement of fields, "Better exploitation of the resources" available in the system or the working environment, "Structure re-design" for eliminating the conflicting parts and properties, "Increasing the control" of the device during the functioning. While the considered environmental impact categories are: global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, particulate matter formation, fossil resources consumption and water consumption. The study identified promising results in all the TRIZ strategies for almost all the environmental impact categories, with percentage reductions on average between 20 and 50%. Compared to previous studies in the literature, these obtained results provide more rigorous, consistent, and broad quantitative evidence about the validity of the individual TRIZ strategies in eco-design. At the same time, some common mechanisms of application of the TRIZ strategies were identified both when they provided the greatest and least environmental benefits. They enriched the discussion of the results, highlighting the many factors that are involved in evaluation, both about the device and external (e.g. electricity mix) and demonstrating that TRIZ's success in eco-design is not a foregone conclusion, despite the many positive opinions in the literature. The results and their discussion provide data history for the designer wishing to use TRIZ in eco-design. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment
    Hanna-Leena Pesonen
    Susanna Horn
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1780 - 1792
  • [42] Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment
    Pesonen, Hanna-Leena
    Horn, Susanna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (09): : 1780 - 1792
  • [44] Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing
    Arulnathan, Vivek
    Heidari, Mohammad Davoud
    Doyon, Maurice
    Li, Eric P. H.
    Pelletier, Nathan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [45] An integrated life cycle inventory for demolition processes in the context of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Bozhilova-Kisheva, Kossara P.
    Hu, Mingming
    van Roekel, Eric
    Olsen, Stig I.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION: CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 86 : 327 - 335
  • [46] The use of life cycle assessment for evaluating the sustainability of the Amsterdam water cycle
    Klaversma, E.
    van der Helm, A. W. C.
    Kappelhof, J. W. N. M.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 4 (02) : 103 - 109
  • [47] Life cycle sustainability assessment of a novel slaughter concept
    Valente, Clara
    Moller, Hanne
    Johnsen, Fredrik Moltu
    Saxegard, Simon
    Brunsdon, Elin Rasten
    Alvseike, Ole Arne
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 272
  • [48] Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing
    Ribeiro, Ines
    Matos, Florinda
    Jacinto, Celeste
    Salman, Hafiz
    Cardeal, Goncalo
    Carvalho, Helena
    Godina, Radu
    Pecas, Paulo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [49] Sustainability of Soy Protein from Life Cycle Assessment
    Braun, Michelle
    Munoz, Ivan
    Schmidt, Jannick H.
    Thrane, Mikkel
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2016, 30
  • [50] Sustainability and Life Cycle Assessment in Industrial Biotechnology Preface
    Froehling, Magnus
    Hiete, Michael
    SUSTAINABILITY AND LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT IN INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 173 : V - V