Quantifying the advantages of TRIZ in sustainability through life cycle assessment

被引:31
|
作者
Spreafico, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergamo, Dept Management Informat & Prod Engn, Via Marconi 5, I-24044 Dalmine, Bg, Italy
关键词
TRIZ; Eco-design; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Literature review; COMPARATIVE LCA; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; WASTE TREATMENT; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; INTEGRATING TRIZ; WIND TURBINE; ECO-DESIGN; RICE HUSK; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126955
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper provides a quantitative evaluation of how much the application of the main TRIZ (Russian acronym for Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) strategies resulted in an increase of the sustainability of different devices by reducing their environmental impacts. The used dataset consists of 144 case studies of Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) extracted from 119 scientific articles. They were manually analysed and classified by analogy according to the TRIZ strategies. These latter deal with "Dematerialization of the device" through an increased involvement of fields, "Better exploitation of the resources" available in the system or the working environment, "Structure re-design" for eliminating the conflicting parts and properties, "Increasing the control" of the device during the functioning. While the considered environmental impact categories are: global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, particulate matter formation, fossil resources consumption and water consumption. The study identified promising results in all the TRIZ strategies for almost all the environmental impact categories, with percentage reductions on average between 20 and 50%. Compared to previous studies in the literature, these obtained results provide more rigorous, consistent, and broad quantitative evidence about the validity of the individual TRIZ strategies in eco-design. At the same time, some common mechanisms of application of the TRIZ strategies were identified both when they provided the greatest and least environmental benefits. They enriched the discussion of the results, highlighting the many factors that are involved in evaluation, both about the device and external (e.g. electricity mix) and demonstrating that TRIZ's success in eco-design is not a foregone conclusion, despite the many positive opinions in the literature. The results and their discussion provide data history for the designer wishing to use TRIZ in eco-design. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle sustainability assessment method for concrete
    Choi, Wonyoung
    Tae, Sungho
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [32] Forum for Sustainability through Life Cycle Innovation
    uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 2016, 24 (1): : 89 - 89
  • [33] Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment
    Martinez-Blanco, Julia
    Lehmann, Annekatrin
    Munoz, Pere
    Anton, Assumpcio
    Traverso, Marzia
    Rieradevall, Joan
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 69 : 34 - 48
  • [34] Geotraceability and life cycle assessment in environmental life cycle management: towards sustainability
    Ometto, Aldo
    Batistella, Mateus
    Guelere Filho, Americo
    Chuzel, Gerard
    Viau, Alain
    COMPLEX SYSTEMS CONCURRENT ENGINEERING: COLLABORATION, TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2007, : 673 - +
  • [35] Assessing the environmental impact and advantages of a commercial aquaponic system in Taiwan through life cycle assessment
    Behr, Lukas Maximilian
    Hu, Allen H.
    Heck, Peter
    AQUACULTURE, 2025, 595
  • [36] Mapping sustainability assessment methods through the industrial symbiosis life cycle for a circular economy
    Ramirez-Rodriguez, Laura Cristina
    Ormazabal, Marta
    Jaca, Carmen
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 50 : 253 - 267
  • [37] Critical indicators of sustainability for biofuels: An analysis through a life cycle sustainabilty assessment perspective
    Collotta, M.
    Champagne, P.
    Tomasoni, G.
    Alberti, M.
    Busi, L.
    Mabee, W.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 115
  • [38] Environmental sustainability assessment of poultry productions through life cycle approaches: A critical review
    Costantini, Michele
    Ferrante, Valentina
    Guarino, Marcella
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 110 : 201 - 212
  • [39] Life Cycle Assessment of Functional Food: Improving Sustainability in the Biotechnology Industry through Transparency
    Lee, Alisha
    Wang, Yini
    Lo, Shih-Fang
    PROCESSES, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [40] Integrated Sustainability Assessment: Exergy, Emergy, Life Cycle Assessment
    Cano-Londono, Natalia
    Heriberto, Cabezas
    Krisztian, Baracza
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 3