Quantifying the advantages of TRIZ in sustainability through life cycle assessment

被引:31
|
作者
Spreafico, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergamo, Dept Management Informat & Prod Engn, Via Marconi 5, I-24044 Dalmine, Bg, Italy
关键词
TRIZ; Eco-design; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Literature review; COMPARATIVE LCA; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; WASTE TREATMENT; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; INTEGRATING TRIZ; WIND TURBINE; ECO-DESIGN; RICE HUSK; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126955
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper provides a quantitative evaluation of how much the application of the main TRIZ (Russian acronym for Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) strategies resulted in an increase of the sustainability of different devices by reducing their environmental impacts. The used dataset consists of 144 case studies of Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) extracted from 119 scientific articles. They were manually analysed and classified by analogy according to the TRIZ strategies. These latter deal with "Dematerialization of the device" through an increased involvement of fields, "Better exploitation of the resources" available in the system or the working environment, "Structure re-design" for eliminating the conflicting parts and properties, "Increasing the control" of the device during the functioning. While the considered environmental impact categories are: global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, particulate matter formation, fossil resources consumption and water consumption. The study identified promising results in all the TRIZ strategies for almost all the environmental impact categories, with percentage reductions on average between 20 and 50%. Compared to previous studies in the literature, these obtained results provide more rigorous, consistent, and broad quantitative evidence about the validity of the individual TRIZ strategies in eco-design. At the same time, some common mechanisms of application of the TRIZ strategies were identified both when they provided the greatest and least environmental benefits. They enriched the discussion of the results, highlighting the many factors that are involved in evaluation, both about the device and external (e.g. electricity mix) and demonstrating that TRIZ's success in eco-design is not a foregone conclusion, despite the many positive opinions in the literature. The results and their discussion provide data history for the designer wishing to use TRIZ in eco-design. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE APPROACH OF LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BIOREFINERIES
    Jungmeier, G.
    Hingsamer, M.
    Steiner, D.
    Kaltenegger, I.
    Kleinegris, D.
    Van Ree, R.
    de Jong, E.
    PAPERS OF THE 24TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2016, : 1660 - 1665
  • [22] Life cycle assessment, electricity generation and sustainability
    Aumonier, S.
    Nuclear Energy, 1998, 37 (05): : 295 - 302
  • [23] The revised mathematics of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Heijungs, Reinout
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 350
  • [24] Mapping sustainability assessment with the project life cycle
    Thomson, Craig S.
    El-Haram, Mohamed A.
    Emmanuel, Rohinton
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 164 (02) : 143 - 157
  • [25] Life cycle assessment, electricity generation and sustainability
    Aumonier, S
    NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 1998, 37 (05): : 295 - 302
  • [26] Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment?
    Stefania Pizzirani
    Sarah J. McLaren
    Jeffrey K. Seadon
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1316 - 1330
  • [27] Is there a place for culture in life cycle sustainability assessment?
    Pizzirani, Stefania
    McLaren, Sarah J.
    Seadon, Jeffrey K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (06): : 1316 - 1330
  • [28] Product sustainability assessment for product life cycle
    He, Bin
    Luo, Ting
    Huang, Shan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 206 : 238 - 250
  • [29] The Use of Life Cycle Techniques in the Assessment of Sustainability
    Gundes, Selin
    URBAN PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (UPADSD), 2016, 216 : 916 - 922
  • [30] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Sonia Valdivia
    Jana Gerta Backes
    Marzia Traverso
    Guido Sonnemann
    Stefano Cucurachi
    Jeroen B. Guinée
    Thomas Schaubroeck
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Noemie Leroy-Parmentier
    Cássia Ugaya
    Claudia Peña
    Alessandra Zamagni
    Atsushi Inaba
    Milena Amaral
    Markus Berger
    Jolanta Dvarioniene
    Tatiana Vakhitova
    Catherine Benoit-Norris
    Martina Prox
    Rajendra Foolmaun
    Mark Goedkoop
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1900 - 1905