Coercion in the Evolution of Plant-Microbe Communication: A Perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Rowe, S. L. [1 ]
Norman, J. S. [1 ]
Friesen, M. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Plant Biol Dept, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Dept Plant Pathol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
QUORUM-SENSING INHIBITORS; CHROMOBACTERIUM-VIOLACEUM; AUXIN PRODUCTION; HOMOSERINE; PSEUDOMONAS; RICE; SUBSTANCES; EXPRESSION; MOLECULE; ETHYLENE;
D O I
10.1094/MPMI-11-17-0276-CR
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Plants and microbes are dependent on chemical signals as a means of interkingdom communication. There are two predicted paths for the evolution of these signals. Ritualization is the oft-assumed pathway for the evolution of plant-microbe communication systems. In this process, chemical signals, which benefit both receiver and sender, evolve from chemical cues, which benefit only the receiver. However, plant-microbe signaling may evolve from coercive interactions as well, a process known as sensory manipulation. Here, we aim to highlight the prevalence of coercive interactions and discuss sensory manipulation in the context of plant-microbe interactions. We present two examples of stabilized coercion: microbial coercion of plants via the release of phytohormones and plant coercion of microbes via manipulation of quorum-sensing compounds. Furthermore, we provide an evolutionary framework for the emergence of signaling from coercive plant-microbe interactions through the process of sensory manipulation. We hope that researchers will recognize the relevance of coercive interactions in plant-microbe systems and consider sensory manipulation as a plausible evolutionary trajectory for the emergence of plant-microbe signaling.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 794
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The coevolutionary genetics of plant-microbe interactions
    Heath, Katy D.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2008, 180 (02) : 268 - 270
  • [42] Alternative splicing in plant-microbe interactions
    Veronese, P.
    Heber, S.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 99 (06) : S165 - S165
  • [43] Pectins, pectinases and plant-microbe interactions
    Prade, RA
    Zhan, DF
    Ayoubi, P
    Mort, AJ
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND GENETIC ENGINEERING REVIEWS, VOL 16, 1999, 16 : 361 - 391
  • [44] The role of water in plant-microbe interactions
    Aung, Kyaw
    Jiang, Yanjuan
    He, Sheng Yang
    PLANT JOURNAL, 2018, 93 (04): : 771 - 780
  • [45] Selenium in Soil–Plant-Microbe: A Review
    Zhen Wang
    Wei Huang
    Fei Pang
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2022, 108 : 167 - 181
  • [46] PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS Finding phenazine
    Kelly, Libusha
    Wolfson, Sarah J.
    ELIFE, 2020, 9
  • [47] Editorial: Biotrophic Plant-Microbe Interactions
    Spanu, Pietro D.
    Panstruga, Ralph
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 8
  • [48] Interkingdom signaling in plant-microbe interactions
    Kan, Jinhong
    Fang, Rongxiang
    Jia, Yantao
    SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES, 2017, 60 (08) : 785 - 796
  • [49] Interkingdom signaling in plant-microbe interactions
    Jinhong Kan
    Rongxiang Fang
    Yantao Jia
    Science China Life Sciences, 2017, 60 : 785 - 796
  • [50] The role of phytohormones in plant-microbe symbioses
    A.M. Hirsch
    Y. Fang
    S. Asad
    Y. Kapulnik
    Plant and Soil, 1997, 194 : 171 - 184