Coercion in the Evolution of Plant-Microbe Communication: A Perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Rowe, S. L. [1 ]
Norman, J. S. [1 ]
Friesen, M. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Plant Biol Dept, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Dept Plant Pathol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
QUORUM-SENSING INHIBITORS; CHROMOBACTERIUM-VIOLACEUM; AUXIN PRODUCTION; HOMOSERINE; PSEUDOMONAS; RICE; SUBSTANCES; EXPRESSION; MOLECULE; ETHYLENE;
D O I
10.1094/MPMI-11-17-0276-CR
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Plants and microbes are dependent on chemical signals as a means of interkingdom communication. There are two predicted paths for the evolution of these signals. Ritualization is the oft-assumed pathway for the evolution of plant-microbe communication systems. In this process, chemical signals, which benefit both receiver and sender, evolve from chemical cues, which benefit only the receiver. However, plant-microbe signaling may evolve from coercive interactions as well, a process known as sensory manipulation. Here, we aim to highlight the prevalence of coercive interactions and discuss sensory manipulation in the context of plant-microbe interactions. We present two examples of stabilized coercion: microbial coercion of plants via the release of phytohormones and plant coercion of microbes via manipulation of quorum-sensing compounds. Furthermore, we provide an evolutionary framework for the emergence of signaling from coercive plant-microbe interactions through the process of sensory manipulation. We hope that researchers will recognize the relevance of coercive interactions in plant-microbe systems and consider sensory manipulation as a plausible evolutionary trajectory for the emergence of plant-microbe signaling.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 794
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lipids in plant-microbe interactions
    Siebers, Meike
    Brands, Mathias
    Wewer, Vera
    Duan, Yanjiao
    Hoelzl, Georg
    Doermann, Peter
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY OF LIPIDS, 2016, 1861 (09): : 1379 - 1395
  • [22] Molecular plant-microbe interactions
    Quigley, NB
    Roberts, DM
    Ownley, BH
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 1996, 1 (11) : 366 - 368
  • [23] Endocytosis in plant-microbe interactions
    Leborgne-Castel, Nathalie
    Adam, Thibaud
    Bouhidel, Karim
    PROTOPLASMA, 2010, 247 (3-4) : 177 - 193
  • [24] Signaling in plant-microbe interactions
    Baker, B
    Zambryski, P
    Staskawicz, B
    DineshKumar, SP
    SCIENCE, 1997, 276 (5313) : 726 - 733
  • [25] Auxin and Plant-Microbe Interactions
    Spaepen, Stijn
    Vanderleyden, Jos
    COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY, 2011, 3 (04): : 1 - 13
  • [26] Plant-Microbe Communications for Symbiosis
    Kawaguchi, Masayoshi
    Minamisawa, Kiwamu
    PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 51 (09) : 1377 - 1380
  • [27] Polyamines in plant-microbe interactions
    Walters, DR
    PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2000, 57 (04) : 137 - 146
  • [28] Plasticity in plant-microbe interactions: a perspective based on the pitch canker pathosystem
    T. R. Gordon
    G. J. Reynolds
    Phytoparasitica, 2017, 45 : 1 - 8
  • [29] Plasticity in plant-microbe interactions: a perspective based on the pitch canker pathosystem
    Gordon, T. R.
    Reynolds, G. J.
    PHYTOPARASITICA, 2017, 45 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [30] Metabolomics in plant-microbe interactions in the roots
    Chen, Li
    Schwier, Melina
    Krumbach, Jenna
    Kopriva, Stanislav
    Jacoby, Richard P.
    PLANT METABOLOMICS IN FULL SWING, 2021, 98 : 133 - 161