Coercion in the Evolution of Plant-Microbe Communication: A Perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Rowe, S. L. [1 ]
Norman, J. S. [1 ]
Friesen, M. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Plant Biol Dept, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Dept Plant Pathol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
QUORUM-SENSING INHIBITORS; CHROMOBACTERIUM-VIOLACEUM; AUXIN PRODUCTION; HOMOSERINE; PSEUDOMONAS; RICE; SUBSTANCES; EXPRESSION; MOLECULE; ETHYLENE;
D O I
10.1094/MPMI-11-17-0276-CR
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Plants and microbes are dependent on chemical signals as a means of interkingdom communication. There are two predicted paths for the evolution of these signals. Ritualization is the oft-assumed pathway for the evolution of plant-microbe communication systems. In this process, chemical signals, which benefit both receiver and sender, evolve from chemical cues, which benefit only the receiver. However, plant-microbe signaling may evolve from coercive interactions as well, a process known as sensory manipulation. Here, we aim to highlight the prevalence of coercive interactions and discuss sensory manipulation in the context of plant-microbe interactions. We present two examples of stabilized coercion: microbial coercion of plants via the release of phytohormones and plant coercion of microbes via manipulation of quorum-sensing compounds. Furthermore, we provide an evolutionary framework for the emergence of signaling from coercive plant-microbe interactions through the process of sensory manipulation. We hope that researchers will recognize the relevance of coercive interactions in plant-microbe systems and consider sensory manipulation as a plausible evolutionary trajectory for the emergence of plant-microbe signaling.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 794
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Signals and cues in the evolution of plant-microbe communication
    van't Padje, Anouk
    Whiteside, Matthew D.
    Kiers, E. Toby
    CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2016, 32 : 47 - 52
  • [2] UNDERSTANDING PLANT-MICROBE COMMUNICATION
    ANDERSON, AJ
    UTAH SCIENCE, 1986, 47 (01): : 6 - 8
  • [3] Rapid evolution in plant-microbe interactions - a molecular genomics perspective
    Frantzeskakis, Lamprinos
    Di Pietro, Antonio
    Rep, Martijn
    Schirawski, Jan
    Wu, Chih-Hang
    Panstruga, Ralph
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2020, 225 (03) : 1134 - 1142
  • [4] Rapid evolution in plant-microbe interactions - an evolutionary genomics perspective
    de Vries, Sophie
    Stukenbrock, Eva H.
    Rose, Laura E.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2020, 226 (05) : 1256 - 1262
  • [5] Evolution of the plant-microbe symbiotic 'toolkit'
    Delaux, Pierre-Marc
    Sejalon-Delmas, Nathalie
    Becard, Guillaume
    Ane, Jean-Michel
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2013, 18 (06) : 298 - 304
  • [6] THE EVOLUTION OF SYMBIOTIC PLANT-MICROBE SIGNALLING
    Clear, Michael R.
    Hom, Erik F. Y.
    ANNUAL PLANT REVIEWS ONLINE, 2019, 2 (03): : 785 - 836
  • [7] NO Network for Plant-Microbe Communication Underground: A Review
    Pande, Anjali
    Mun, Bong-Gyu
    Lee, Da-Sol
    Khan, Murtaza
    Lee, Geun-Mo
    Hussain, Adil
    Yun, Byung-Wook
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 12
  • [8] Engineering plant-microbe communication for plant nutrient use efficiency
    Griffin, Catherine
    Oz, M. Tufan
    Demirer, Gozde S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 88
  • [9] Plant-microbe interactions in the apoplast: Communication at the plant cell wall
    Dora, Susanne
    Terrett, Oliver M.
    Sanchez-Rodriguez, Clara
    PLANT CELL, 2022, 34 (05): : 1532 - 1550
  • [10] Engineering synthetic plant-microbe signal communication in the rhizosphere
    Paramasivan, P.
    Geddes, B.
    Poole, P. S.
    Oldroyd, G.
    MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2019, 32 (10) : 9 - 9