Reflections on beam configuration optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy

被引:6
|
作者
Cao, Wenhua [1 ]
Rocha, Humberto [2 ,3 ]
Mohan, Radhe [1 ]
Lim, Gino [4 ]
Goudarzi, Hadis M. [4 ]
Ferreira, Brigida C. [3 ,5 ]
Dias, Joana M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, CeBER, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[4] Univ Houston, Dept Ind Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[5] Univ Lisbon, Inst Biophys & Biomed Engn, Fac Sci, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2022年 / 67卷 / 13期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
beam angle optimization (BAO); proton therapy; IMPT; RBE; robustness; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; RADIATION-INDUCED LYMPHOPENIA; CANCER-INSTITUTE WORKSHOP; LINEAR-ENERGY-TRANSFER; CELL LUNG-CANCER; ANGLE OPTIMIZATION; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; ORIENTATION OPTIMIZATION; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; EYE-VIEW;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac6fac
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Presumably, intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) is the most powerful form of proton radiotherapy. In the current state of the art, IMPT beam configurations (i.e. the number of beams and their directions) are, in general, chosen subjectively based on prior experience and practicality. Beam configuration optimization (BCO) for IMPT could, in theory, significantly enhance IMPT's therapeutic potential. However, BCO is complex and highly computer resource-intensive. Some algorithms for BCO have been developed for intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT). They are rarely used clinically mainly because the large number of beams typically employed in IMRT renders BCO essentially unnecessary. Moreover, in the newer form of IMRT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, there are no individual static beams. BCO is of greater importance for IMPT because it typically employs a very small number of beams (2-4) and, when the number of beams is small, BCO is critical for improving plan quality. However, the unique properties and requirements of protons, particularly in IMPT, make BCO challenging. Protons are more sensitive than photons to anatomic changes, exhibit variable relative biological effectiveness along their paths, and, as recently discovered, may spare the immune system. Such factors must be considered in IMPT BCO, though doing so would make BCO more resource intensive and make it more challenging to extend BCO algorithms developed for IMRT to IMPT. A limited amount of research in IMPT BCO has been conducted; however, considerable additional work is needed for its further development to make it truly effective and computationally practical. This article aims to provide a review of existing BCO algorithms, most of which were developed for IMRT, and addresses important requirements specific to BCO for IMPT optimization that necessitate the modification of existing approaches or the development of new effective and efficient ones.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On polling directions for randomized direct-search approaches: application to beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Rocha, H.
    Dias, J.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 2025, 91 (02) : 371 - 392
  • [42] Dose Interval Volume Constraint Based Robust Optimization of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy
    Shan, J.
    Liu, W.
    Au, Y.
    Schild, M.
    Bues, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2994 - 2995
  • [43] Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques
    Liu, Wei
    Li, Yupeng
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Cao, Wenhua
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3089 - 3101
  • [44] A Probabilistic Margin for Sensitivity-Regularized Robust Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy
    Gu, W.
    Ruan, D.
    Zou, J.
    Dong, L.
    Sheng, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E596 - E596
  • [45] Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers
    Liu, Wei
    Frank, Steven J.
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Li, Yupeng
    Park, Peter C.
    Dong, Lei
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Mohan, Radhe
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (05)
  • [46] Energy layer optimization strategies for intensity-modulated proton therapy of lung cancer patients
    Jensen, M. Fuglsang
    Hoffmann, L.
    Petersen, J. B. B.
    Moller, D. S.
    Alber, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (10) : 4355 - 4363
  • [47] Utilization of neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer in the United States
    Haque, Waqar
    Verma, Vivek
    Butler, E. Brian
    Teh, Bin S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (02) : 282 - 294
  • [48] Conical beam geometry intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Schuler, Emil
    Wang, Lei
    Loo, Billy W., Jr.
    Maxim, Peter G.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (12):
  • [49] TORPEdO: A phase III trial of intensity-modulated proton beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for multi-toxicity reduction in oropharyngeal cancer
    Thomson, David J.
    Cruickshank, Clare
    Baines, Helen
    Banner, Russell
    Beasley, Matthew
    Betts, Guy
    Bulbeck, Helen
    Charlwood, Frances
    Christian, Judith
    Clarke, Matthew
    Donnelly, Olly
    Foran, Bernadette
    Gillies, Callum
    Griffin, Clare
    Homer, Jarrod J.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Lee, Lip Wai
    Lester, James
    Lowe, Matthew
    McPartlin, Andrew
    Miles, Elizabeth
    Nutting, Christopher
    Palaniappan, Nachi
    Prestwich, Robin
    Price, James M.
    Roberts, Clare
    Roe, Justin
    Shanmugasundaram, Ramkumar
    Simoes, Rita
    Thompson, Anna
    West, Catharine
    Wilson, Lorna
    Wolstenholme, Jane
    Hall, Emma
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 147 - 154
  • [50] TORPEdO - A Phase III Trial of Intensity-modulated Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Multi-toxicity Reduction in Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Price, J.
    Hall, E.
    West, C.
    Thomson, D.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (02) : 84 - 88