Reflections on beam configuration optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy

被引:6
|
作者
Cao, Wenhua [1 ]
Rocha, Humberto [2 ,3 ]
Mohan, Radhe [1 ]
Lim, Gino [4 ]
Goudarzi, Hadis M. [4 ]
Ferreira, Brigida C. [3 ,5 ]
Dias, Joana M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, CeBER, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[4] Univ Houston, Dept Ind Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[5] Univ Lisbon, Inst Biophys & Biomed Engn, Fac Sci, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2022年 / 67卷 / 13期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
beam angle optimization (BAO); proton therapy; IMPT; RBE; robustness; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; RADIATION-INDUCED LYMPHOPENIA; CANCER-INSTITUTE WORKSHOP; LINEAR-ENERGY-TRANSFER; CELL LUNG-CANCER; ANGLE OPTIMIZATION; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; ORIENTATION OPTIMIZATION; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; EYE-VIEW;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac6fac
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Presumably, intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) is the most powerful form of proton radiotherapy. In the current state of the art, IMPT beam configurations (i.e. the number of beams and their directions) are, in general, chosen subjectively based on prior experience and practicality. Beam configuration optimization (BCO) for IMPT could, in theory, significantly enhance IMPT's therapeutic potential. However, BCO is complex and highly computer resource-intensive. Some algorithms for BCO have been developed for intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT). They are rarely used clinically mainly because the large number of beams typically employed in IMRT renders BCO essentially unnecessary. Moreover, in the newer form of IMRT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, there are no individual static beams. BCO is of greater importance for IMPT because it typically employs a very small number of beams (2-4) and, when the number of beams is small, BCO is critical for improving plan quality. However, the unique properties and requirements of protons, particularly in IMPT, make BCO challenging. Protons are more sensitive than photons to anatomic changes, exhibit variable relative biological effectiveness along their paths, and, as recently discovered, may spare the immune system. Such factors must be considered in IMPT BCO, though doing so would make BCO more resource intensive and make it more challenging to extend BCO algorithms developed for IMRT to IMPT. A limited amount of research in IMPT BCO has been conducted; however, considerable additional work is needed for its further development to make it truly effective and computationally practical. This article aims to provide a review of existing BCO algorithms, most of which were developed for IMRT, and addresses important requirements specific to BCO for IMPT optimization that necessitate the modification of existing approaches or the development of new effective and efficient ones.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is Proton-beam Therapy Better Than Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer?
    Kagan, Arthur R.
    Yeh, Jekwon
    Schulz, Robert J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 37 (06): : 525 - 527
  • [32] Dosimetric advantages of proton beam therapy compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for retroperitoneal chordoma
    Yu, Nathan Y.
    Vora, Sujay A.
    RARE TUMORS, 2019, 11
  • [33] Optimization of beam parameters and treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy
    Trofimov, A
    Bortfeld, T
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2003, 2 (05) : 437 - 444
  • [34] Dosimetric study of beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning
    Shukla, Arvind Kumar
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Sandhu, I. S.
    Oinam, Arun S.
    Singh, Ranjit
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 1045 - 1049
  • [35] Does Beam Angle Optimization Really Matter for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy?
    Rocha, Humberto
    Dias, Joana M.
    Ferreira, Brigida C.
    Lopes, Maria do Carmo
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2015, PT II, 2015, 9156 : 522 - 533
  • [36] A nested partitions framework for beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    D'Souza, Warren D.
    Zhang, Hao H.
    Nazareth, Daryl P.
    Shi, Leyuan
    Meyer, Robert R.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (12): : 3293 - 3307
  • [37] Intensity-modulated proton therapy and osteoradionecrosis in oropharyngeal cancer
    Zhang, Wencheng
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Yang, Pei
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Garden, Adam S.
    Gunn, Brandon
    Fuller, C. David
    Chambers, Mark
    Hutcheson, Katherine A.
    Ye, Rong
    Lai, Stephen Y.
    Radwan, Mohamed Abdallah Sherif
    Zhu, X. Ron
    Frank, Steven J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 (03) : 401 - 405
  • [38] Optimal minimum MU for intensity-modulated proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning proton beams
    Yi, Byongyong
    Mossahebi, Sina
    Jatczak, Jenna
    Mundis, Michelle
    Houser, Thomas
    Alicia, David
    Han, Dong
    Gonzalez, Rosette
    Olis, Stephen
    Zakhary, Mark
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (09):
  • [39] Comparison of proton arc therapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy for pediatric ependymoma
    Henjum, Helge
    Feten, Karoline M.
    Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S.
    Boer, Camilla G.
    Stokkevag, Camilla H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4695 - S4698
  • [40] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy-2 Effective Treatment Modalities for Nasopharyngeal Cancer
    Falchook, Aaron
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (06)