Reflections on beam configuration optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy

被引:6
|
作者
Cao, Wenhua [1 ]
Rocha, Humberto [2 ,3 ]
Mohan, Radhe [1 ]
Lim, Gino [4 ]
Goudarzi, Hadis M. [4 ]
Ferreira, Brigida C. [3 ,5 ]
Dias, Joana M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, CeBER, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[4] Univ Houston, Dept Ind Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[5] Univ Lisbon, Inst Biophys & Biomed Engn, Fac Sci, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2022年 / 67卷 / 13期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
beam angle optimization (BAO); proton therapy; IMPT; RBE; robustness; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; RADIATION-INDUCED LYMPHOPENIA; CANCER-INSTITUTE WORKSHOP; LINEAR-ENERGY-TRANSFER; CELL LUNG-CANCER; ANGLE OPTIMIZATION; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; ORIENTATION OPTIMIZATION; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; EYE-VIEW;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac6fac
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Presumably, intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) is the most powerful form of proton radiotherapy. In the current state of the art, IMPT beam configurations (i.e. the number of beams and their directions) are, in general, chosen subjectively based on prior experience and practicality. Beam configuration optimization (BCO) for IMPT could, in theory, significantly enhance IMPT's therapeutic potential. However, BCO is complex and highly computer resource-intensive. Some algorithms for BCO have been developed for intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT). They are rarely used clinically mainly because the large number of beams typically employed in IMRT renders BCO essentially unnecessary. Moreover, in the newer form of IMRT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, there are no individual static beams. BCO is of greater importance for IMPT because it typically employs a very small number of beams (2-4) and, when the number of beams is small, BCO is critical for improving plan quality. However, the unique properties and requirements of protons, particularly in IMPT, make BCO challenging. Protons are more sensitive than photons to anatomic changes, exhibit variable relative biological effectiveness along their paths, and, as recently discovered, may spare the immune system. Such factors must be considered in IMPT BCO, though doing so would make BCO more resource intensive and make it more challenging to extend BCO algorithms developed for IMRT to IMPT. A limited amount of research in IMPT BCO has been conducted; however, considerable additional work is needed for its further development to make it truly effective and computationally practical. This article aims to provide a review of existing BCO algorithms, most of which were developed for IMRT, and addresses important requirements specific to BCO for IMPT optimization that necessitate the modification of existing approaches or the development of new effective and efficient ones.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A hybrid approach to beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Bertsimas, D.
    Cacchiani, V.
    Craft, D.
    Nohadani, O.
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2013, 40 (09) : 2187 - 2197
  • [22] Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer - A case matched analysis
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Garden, Adam S.
    Gunn, G. Brandon
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Morrison, William H.
    Hernandez, Mike
    Crutison, Joseph
    Lee, Jack J.
    Ye, Rong
    Fuller, C. David
    Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
    Hutcheson, Kate A.
    Holliday, Emma B.
    Thaker, Nikhil G.
    Sturgis, Erich M.
    Kies, Merrill S.
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Mohan, Radhe
    Frank, Steven J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [23] Outcomes of Proton Beam Therapy Compared With Intensity-Modulated Radiation for Uterine Cancer
    Anderson, Justin D.
    Voss, Molly M.
    Laughlin, Brady S.
    Garda, Allison E.
    Aziz, Khaled
    Mullikin, Trey C.
    Haddock, Michael G.
    Petersen, Ivy A.
    DeWees, Todd A.
    Vora, Sujay A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2022,
  • [24] Proton Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Matched Case-control Study of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy
    Li, X.
    Lee, A.
    Lee, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 106 (05): : 1138 - 1139
  • [25] Optimization of the Irradiation Efficiency of intensity-modulated Proton Therapy Plans through prioritized Optimization
    Mueller, B. S.
    Wilkens, J. J.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 : 80 - 80
  • [26] Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Chen, Wei
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Trofimov, Alexei
    Madden, Thomas
    Kooy, Hanne
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    Craft, David
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (03): : 591 - 608
  • [27] Robust Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Base-Of-Skull Cancers
    Liu, W.
    Mohan, R.
    Zhu, X.
    Grosshans, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [28] Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization
    Gu, Wenbo
    Ruan, Dan
    O'Connor, Daniel
    Zou, Wei
    Dong, Lei
    Tsai, Min-Yu
    Jia, Xun
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (03) : 1408 - 1425
  • [29] The influence of the optimization starting conditions on the robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy plans
    Albertini, F.
    Hug, E. B.
    Lomax, A. J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10): : 2863 - 2878
  • [30] Hematologic Toxicity Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Anal Cancer Patients
    Nelson, B.
    Tadesse, D.
    Wang, K.
    Meier, T.
    Mascia, A. E.
    Kharofa, J. R., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E64 - E65