Evaluation of a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias

被引:12
|
作者
Boriani, G
Wollmann, C
Biffi, M
Kühl, M
Schuchert, A
Sperzel, J
Stiller, S
Gasparini, G
Böcker, D
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Inst Cardiol, Policlin S Orsola, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Munster, Dept Cardiol, D-4400 Munster, Germany
[3] Guidant Inc, St Paul, MN USA
[4] Univ Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Ulm, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2003年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
atrial tachyarrhythmia; atrialftbrillation; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; detection time; cardioversion; defibrillation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00072.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Eighty-nine patients with a documented history of atrial tachyarrhythmias or fibrillation (AF) received a cardioverter defibrillator designed to selectively differentiate and treat atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Twenty-two patients received a coronary sinus lead and, therefore, could use a separate shock vector for selective treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias/AE The device is designed to treat tachyarrhythmias with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and/or shock therapy using an atrial and/or a ventricular shock vector. Patients underwent induction and shock termination of atrial or dual tachyarrhythmias (AF/VF) to verify proper device function and to measure the arrhythmia detection time with enhancements and preventive algorithms programmed On and Off, respectively. Detection time for 329 VF inductions was 2.41 +/- 0.64 seconds with enhancements On and 2.29 +/- 0.47 with enhancements Off (NS). At implant or predischarge, 283 AF and/or AF/VF (121 atrial and 162 atrial/ventricular fibrillation) were induced. Shock conversion efficacy was 89.8% with AF conversion energies ranging from 0.9 to 27 J. Thirteen of the 23 patients had atrial shock conversions using the separate shock vector with an average conversion energy of 1.9 +/- 1.41. (range 0.5-5 J) A During follow-up the efficacy of ATP on atrial tachyarrhythmias was 59% and the efficacy of delivered shocks on AF was 85%. This new dual chamber cardioverter defibrillator appropriately detected and classified atrial arrhythmias, and shock therapy for AF was highly effective. The detection algorithm differentiated atrial tachyarrhythmia/AF and did not delay VF detection. The separate shock vector converted induced AF with energies ranging from 0.6 to 5 J.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 465
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator-pacemaker
    Pfeiffer D.
    Mende M.
    Hagendorff A.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2000, 2 (4) : 335 - 340
  • [22] Atrial oversensing in a dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator due to electromechanical lead interaction
    Cohen, TJ
    Ibrahim, B
    Quan, WL
    HEARTWEB, 1997, 3 (01): : U6 - U10
  • [23] Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Is it useful in patient with permanent atrial fibrillation?
    Porres-Aracama, Jose M.
    Luis Cerezuela, Jose
    Garcia-Urra, Francisco
    Luque-Lezcano, Oscar
    Herrero, Vicente
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2016, 4 (08): : 747 - 751
  • [24] Evolution of extravascular implantable cardioverter- defibrillator therapy for ventricular arrhythmias
    Romers, Hans
    van Dijk, Vincent
    Boersma, Lucas
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2023, 4 (01): : 59 - 64
  • [25] Anxiety and Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias or Mortality in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
    Habibovic, Mirela
    Pedersen, Susanne S.
    van den Broek, Krista C.
    Theuns, Dominic A. M. J.
    Jordaens, Luc
    van der Voort, Pepijn H.
    Alings, Marco
    Denollet, Johan
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2013, 75 (01): : 36 - 41
  • [26] The Effect of Air Pollution on Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
    Shahabi, Javad
    Azhari, Amirhossein
    Safari, Mohsen
    Rahimi-Pordanjani, Amin
    RESEARCH IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04) : 108 - 111
  • [27] False negative detections of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
    Królak, T
    Lubiñski, A
    Kempa, M
    Pazdyga, A
    Lewicka-Nowak, E
    Zienciuk, A
    Swiatecka, G
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 276 - 276
  • [28] Single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator compared to dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator: less is more! Data from the German Device Registry
    Bogossian, Harilaos
    Frommeyer, Gerrit
    Hochadel, Matthias
    Ince, Huseyin
    Spitzer, Stefan G.
    Eckardt, Lars
    Maier, Sebastian K. G.
    Kleemann, Thomas
    Brachmann, Johannes
    Stellbrink, Christoph
    Gonska, Bernd-Dieter
    Kaeaeb, Stefan
    Senges, Jochen
    Lemke, Bernd
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 109 (07) : 911 - 917
  • [29] Single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator compared to dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator: less is more! Data from the German Device Registry
    Harilaos Bogossian
    Gerrit Frommeyer
    Matthias Hochadel
    Hüseyin Ince
    Stefan G. Spitzer
    Lars Eckardt
    Sebastian K. G. Maier
    Thomas Kleemann
    Johannes Brachmann
    Christoph Stellbrink
    Bernd-Dieter Gonska
    Stefan Kääb
    Jochen Senges
    Bernd Lemke
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2020, 109 : 911 - 917
  • [30] Dofetilide Reduces the Frequency of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapies
    Baquero, Giselle A.
    Banchs, Javier E.
    Depalma, Sondra
    Young, Sallie K.
    Penny-Peterson, Erica D.
    Samii, Soraya M.
    Wolbrette, Deborah L.
    Naccarelli, Gerald V.
    Gonzalez, Mario D.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (03) : 296 - 301