Return-on-Investment Potential for US Army Missile Health Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Simmons, David R. [1 ]
Marotta, Stephen A. [2 ]
机构
[1] CGI Fed Inc, 7067 Old Madison Pike, Huntsville, AL 35806 USA
[2] US Army Aviat & Missile Res, Dev & Engn Ctr, RDMR SER, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Application of health monitoring technology and the capability to predict failures can potentially improve the efficiency and effectiveness of US Army missile sustainment. Sustainment functions throughout the weapon's lifecycle and across the spectrum of different Army missiles such as field testing, lab testing, inspections, retrograde, maintenance, reliability improvements, and supply functions offer many opportunities to better the sustainment status quo in both cost and performance. New technology solutions must however accrue benefits associated with metrics such as total life cycle cost, as well as other readiness-type metrics such as reporting accuracy, timeliness, uncertainty, and other factors. Application of health monitoring and failure prediction must provide an acceptably high return in benefits as compared to the investments needed upfront for development and deployment. Given those constraints, only the most innovative and well engineered applications of existing, emerging, and new technology will suffice in context even though overall sustainment improvements are highly desired. The information in this paper is intended to notionally describe the US Army's missile logistics and supply such that feasible and effective technology solutions can be targeted at specific processes, and thereby provide maximal quantifiable effect. The paper will also briefly address applied research currently being conducted that targets Return-on-Investment (ROI) risks and thereby better enable technology transition.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using a return-on-investment estimation model to evaluate outcomes from an obesity management worksite health promotion program
    Baker, Kristin M.
    Goetzel, Ron Z.
    Pei, Xiaofei
    Weiss, Audrey J.
    Bowen, Jennie
    Tabrizi, Maryam J.
    Nelson, Craig F.
    Metz, R. Douglas
    Pelletier, Kenneth R.
    Thompson, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2008, 50 (09) : 981 - 990
  • [42] Return-On-Investment for Billable Pharmacist-Provided Services in the Primary Care Setting
    Tran, Thuy
    Moczygemba, Leticia R.
    Musselman, Kerri T.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 35 (06) : 916 - 921
  • [43] Guiding conservation and renewable energy development using a paired return-on-investment approach
    Howard, Timothy G.
    Schlesinger, Matthew D.
    Lee, Cara
    Lampman, Gregory
    Tear, Timothy H.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2016, 201 : 69 - 77
  • [44] Is conservation right to go big? Protected area size and conservation return-on-investment
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    Jackson, Heather B.
    Cho, Seong-Hoon
    Clark, Melissa
    Fargione, Joseph E.
    Iacona, Gwenllian D.
    Kim, Taeyoung
    Larson, Eric R.
    Minney, Thomas
    Sutton, Nathan A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 225 : 229 - 236
  • [45] A Comment on Brimberg and ReVelle (2000): The maximum return-on-investment plant location problem
    Mercer, A
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2001, 52 (02) : 240 - 241
  • [46] Human capital return-on-investment in South African companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
    Viljoen, Helene
    De Kock, Francois
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 547 - 547
  • [47] Optimizing return-on-investment (ROI) for empirical software engineering studies -: Working group results
    Prechelt, Lutz
    Empirical Software Engineering Issues: Critical Assessment and Future Directions, 2007, 4336 : 54 - 57
  • [48] A return on investment analysis of applying health monitoring to LED lighting systems
    Chang, Moon-Hwan
    Sandborn, Peter
    Pecht, Michael
    Yung, Winco K. C.
    Wang, Wenbin
    MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2015, 55 (3-4) : 527 - 537
  • [49] Private-sector conservation under theUSEndangered Species Act: a return-on-investment perspective
    Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca
    Boyd, James
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 18 (07) : 409 - 416
  • [50] Gunstige uitkomst van ‘return-on-investment’ voor een programma gericht op gewichtsvermindering
    C. P. J. Everaert
    TBV – Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde, 2008, 16 (9): : 392 - 392