Private-sector conservation under theUSEndangered Species Act: a return-on-investment perspective

被引:14
|
作者
Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca [1 ]
Boyd, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PERVERSE INCENTIVES; ECONOMICS; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1002/fee.2193
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
TheUSEndangered Species Act (ESA) is an important safety net for the protection and recovery of critically imperiled species. One mechanism of theESAis prohibitions on harming listed species and their habitat, yet theESAdoes not require proactive conservation by the private sector, which is necessary for the recovery of many species. A range ofESAprograms have been developed - including Candidate Conservation Agreements, Safe Harbor Agreements, and a Voluntary Prelisting Conservation Actions policy - to enhance flexibility and encourage voluntary conservation activities. But why would businesses and other private landowners voluntarily engage in proactive conservation efforts above and beyond what is required forESAcompliance? We applied a return-on-investment (ROI) perspective to outline sources of costs and benefits and to explore program participation incentives. ThisROIperspective sheds light on the types of financial factors likely to affect private-sector participation and program effectiveness, and points to better ways to target private-sector engagement and design more effective programs.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 416
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmaceutical marketing return-on-investment: a European perspective
    Rod, Michel
    Ashill, Nicholas J.
    Carruthers, Janet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTHCARE MARKETING, 2007, 1 (02) : 174 - +
  • [2] A return-on-investment framework to identify conservation priorities in Africa
    Tear, Timothy H.
    Stratton, Bradford N.
    Game, Edward T.
    Brown, Matthew A.
    Apse, Colin D.
    Shirer, Rebecca R.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 173 : 42 - 52
  • [3] Private-sector caesarean sections in perspective
    Rothberg, AD
    McLeod, H
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 95 (04): : 257 - 260
  • [4] Africa: Promoting private-sector investment in energy
    Petroleum Economist, 2000, 67 (02):
  • [5] PRIVATE-PUBLIC REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE DECISIONS AND RETURN-ON-INVESTMENT
    POWELL, RM
    QUICK FROZEN FOODS, 1978, 40 (12): : 56 - 57
  • [6] Is conservation right to go big? Protected area size and conservation return-on-investment
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    Jackson, Heather B.
    Cho, Seong-Hoon
    Clark, Melissa
    Fargione, Joseph E.
    Iacona, Gwenllian D.
    Kim, Taeyoung
    Larson, Eric R.
    Minney, Thomas
    Sutton, Nathan A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 225 : 229 - 236
  • [7] MIXED SERVICE DELIVERY - A PRIVATE-SECTOR PERSPECTIVE
    HOWARD, JL
    CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 1986, 29 (04): : 553 - 555
  • [8] MINING INVESTMENT PROMOTION - A VIEW FROM THE PRIVATE-SECTOR
    ANDREWS, CB
    NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 1991, 15 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [9] Do fiscal rules shape private-sector investment decisions?
    Sawadogo, Rayangnewende Frans
    JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2024, 81
  • [10] THE PRIVATE-SECTOR INVESTOR'S PERSPECTIVE IN THE FRAME OF PPP
    Turhani, Ali
    4TH ANNUAL EUROMED CONFERENCE OF THE EUROMED ACADEMY OF BUSINESS: BUSINESS RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN A TURBULENT ERA, 2011, : 2241 - 2241