Return-on-Investment Potential for US Army Missile Health Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Simmons, David R. [1 ]
Marotta, Stephen A. [2 ]
机构
[1] CGI Fed Inc, 7067 Old Madison Pike, Huntsville, AL 35806 USA
[2] US Army Aviat & Missile Res, Dev & Engn Ctr, RDMR SER, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Application of health monitoring technology and the capability to predict failures can potentially improve the efficiency and effectiveness of US Army missile sustainment. Sustainment functions throughout the weapon's lifecycle and across the spectrum of different Army missiles such as field testing, lab testing, inspections, retrograde, maintenance, reliability improvements, and supply functions offer many opportunities to better the sustainment status quo in both cost and performance. New technology solutions must however accrue benefits associated with metrics such as total life cycle cost, as well as other readiness-type metrics such as reporting accuracy, timeliness, uncertainty, and other factors. Application of health monitoring and failure prediction must provide an acceptably high return in benefits as compared to the investments needed upfront for development and deployment. Given those constraints, only the most innovative and well engineered applications of existing, emerging, and new technology will suffice in context even though overall sustainment improvements are highly desired. The information in this paper is intended to notionally describe the US Army's missile logistics and supply such that feasible and effective technology solutions can be targeted at specific processes, and thereby provide maximal quantifiable effect. The paper will also briefly address applied research currently being conducted that targets Return-on-Investment (ROI) risks and thereby better enable technology transition.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Financial return-on-investment of ophthalmic interventions: a new paradigm
    Brown, Melissa M.
    Brown, Gary C.
    Lieske, Heidi B.
    Lieske, P. Alexander
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 25 (03) : 171 - 176
  • [22] CALCULATING RETURN-ON-INVESTMENT FOR A MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
    Hung, A.
    Seneviratne, V
    McDonnell, D.
    Mostovoy, L.
    Dzieweczynski, J.
    Yoder, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A41 - A41
  • [23] Establishing Return-on-Investment Expectations for Patient-Centric Initiatives
    Getz, Kenneth A.
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2015, 49 (05) : 745 - 749
  • [24] COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND RETURN-ON-INVESTMENT OF THE DYNAMIC WORK INTERVENTION
    Ben, A.
    Jelsma, J. G. M.
    Renaud, L. R.
    Huysmans, M. A.
    van Nassau, F.
    van der Beek, A. J.
    van der Ploeg, H.
    van Dongen, H.
    Bosmans, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S774 - S775
  • [25] 12-Lead Electrocardiogram Education: A Return-on-Investment Strategy
    Lewandowski, Adriane
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2018, 38 (02) : E48 - E48
  • [26] PRIVATE-PUBLIC REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE DECISIONS AND RETURN-ON-INVESTMENT
    POWELL, RM
    QUICK FROZEN FOODS, 1978, 40 (12): : 56 - 57
  • [27] Establishing Return-on-Investment Expectations for Patient-Centric Initiatives
    Kenneth A. Getz
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2015, 49 : 745 - 749
  • [28] The maximum return-on-investment plant location problem with market share
    Brimberg, J.
    Hansen, P.
    Laporte, G.
    Mladenovic, N.
    Urosevic, D.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2008, 59 (03) : 399 - 406
  • [29] An Online Tool for Estimating Return-on-investment for Water Recycling at Nurseries
    Gottlieb, Paul D.
    Brumfield, Robin G.
    Cabrera, Raul, I
    Farnsworth, Daniel
    Marxen, Lucas
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) : 47 - 57
  • [30] Return-on-investment (ROI) for electronic prognostics in MIL/AERO systems
    Goodman, Douglas L.
    Wood, Steve
    Turner, Andy
    AUTOTESTCON 2005, 2005, : 73 - 75