Changes in Radial Artery Pulse Pressure During a Fluid Challenge Cannot Assess Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Septic Shock

被引:5
|
作者
De la Puente-Diaz de Leon, Victor [1 ]
Jaramillo-Rocha, Valente de Jesus [2 ]
Teboul, Jean-Louis [3 ]
Garcia-Miranda, Sofia [4 ]
Martinez-Guerra, Bernardo A. [5 ]
Dominguez-Cherit, Guillermo [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Crit Care Med, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Gen Hosp, Interdept Div Crit Care, 585 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Paris Sud, Bicetre Univ Hosp, Med Intens Care Unit, Paris, France
[4] Fdn Clin Med Sur, Dept Internal Med, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[5] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Internal Med, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
fluid challenge; fluid responsiveness; radial pulse pressure; pulmonary artery catheter; cardiac output; septic shock; CARDIAC-OUTPUT; INTENSIVE-CARE;
D O I
10.1177/0885066617732291
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Arterial blood pressure is the most common variable used to assess the response to a fluid challenge in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the change in the radial artery pulse pressure (rPP) to detect the change in cardiac output after a fluid challenge in patients with septic shock. Methods: Prospective observational study including 35 patients with septic shock in which rPP and cardiac output were measured before and after a fluid challenge with 400 mL of crystalloid solution. Cardiac output was measured with intermittent thermodilution technique using a pulmonary artery catheter. Patients were divided between responders (increase >15% of cardiac output after fluid challenge) and nonresponders. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Pearson correlation coefficient and paired Student t test were used in statistical analysis. Results: Forty-three percent of the patients were fluid responders. The change in rPP could not neither discriminate between responders and nonresponders (AUROC = 0.52; [95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.72] P = .8) nor correlate (r = .21, P = .1) with the change in cardiac output after the fluid challenge. Conclusions: The change in rPP neither discriminated between fluid responders and nonresponders nor correlated with the change in cardiac output after a fluid challenge. The change in rPP cannot serve as a surrogate of the change in cardiac output to assess the response to a fluid challenge in patients with septic shock.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DYNAMIC CHANGES IN ESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER DERIVED PARAMETERS BY ELEVATION OF PEEP, PREDICT FLUID RESPONSIVENESS IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK
    Tapanwong, Nat
    Chuntupama, P.
    Wacharasint, P.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2017, 22 : 122 - 122
  • [32] Changes of central venous oxygen saturation define fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational study
    Xu, Biao
    Yang, Xiaobo
    Wang, Chunyao
    Jiang, Wei
    Weng, Li
    Hu, Xiaoyun
    Peng, Jinmin
    Du, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 38 : 13 - 19
  • [33] Fluid Responsiveness by Femoral Artery Doppler in Septic Shock: Validation with Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography
    Omar, Walid
    Abbas, Osama
    Fawzy, Suzy
    Afify, Mohammed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 8 (04): : 90 - 95
  • [34] Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness
    Du, Wei
    Wang, Xiao-Ting
    Long, Yun
    Liu, Da-Wei
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 130 (10) : 1202 - 1210
  • [35] Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness
    Wei Du
    Xiao?Ting Wang
    Yun Long
    Da?Wei Liu
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2017, 130 (10) : 1202 - 1210
  • [36] Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing automated pulse pressure variation by IntelliVue MP monitor and stroke volume variation by FloTrac™/Vigileo™
    B Khwannimit
    R Bhurayanontachai
    Critical Care, 15 (Suppl 1):
  • [37] Do not abandon monitoring the central venous pressure during fluid resuscitation of septic shock patients
    Mallat, Jihad
    Reddi, Benjamin John
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 44 (11) : 2012 - 2013
  • [38] Do not abandon monitoring the central venous pressure during fluid resuscitation of septic shock patients
    Jihad Mallat
    Benjamin John Reddi
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2018, 44 : 2012 - 2013
  • [39] OPTIMUM LEFT HEART FILLING PRESSURE DURING FLUID RESUSCITATION OF PATIENTS WITH HYPOVOLEMIC AND SEPTIC SHOCK
    PACKMAN, MI
    RACKOW, EC
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1983, 11 (03) : 165 - 169
  • [40] Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock
    Michard, Frederic
    Lopes, Marcel R.
    Auler, Jose-Otavio C., Jr.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 11 (03):