Towards Culturally Sensitive Shared Decision-Making in Oncology A Study Protocol Integrating Bioethical Qualitative Research on Shared Decision-Making Among Ethnic Minorities With Ethical Reflection

被引:4
|
作者
Oueslati, Roukayya [1 ,2 ]
Reis, Ria [3 ,4 ]
de Vries, Martine C. [1 ]
Slager, Meralda T. [2 ]
van der Sijp, Joost R. M. [5 ]
Stiggelbout, Anne M. [6 ]
Touwen, Dorothea P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Med Eth & Hlth Law, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] The Hague Univ Appl Sci, Dept Nursing, POB 13336, NL-2501 EH The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social Sci Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] The Hague Univ Appl Sci, Res Grp Oncol Care, The Hague, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Med Decis Making, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
shared decision-making; oncology; ethnic minorities; empirical bioethics; reflective equilibrium; culturally sensitive; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT ENCOUNTER; RACIAL DISPARITIES; PATIENTS VALUES; HEALTH-CARE; GRAPHIC ELICITATION; PERSONAL VALUES; BREAST; PREFERENCES; NETHERLANDS; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1177/16094069221086731
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is often considered the ideal for decision-making in oncology. Views of specific groups such as ethnic minorities have seldom been considered in its development. Aim In this study we seek to assess in oncology if there is a need for adaptation of the current SDM model to ethnic minorities and to formulate possible adjustments. Design This study is embedded in empirical bioethics, an interdisciplinary approach integrating empirical data with ethical reasoning to formulate normative conclusions regarding a practice. For the empirical social scientific part, a cross-sectional qualitative study will be conducted; for the ethical reflection the Reflective Equilibrium will be used to develop a coherent view on the application of SDM among ethnic minorities in oncology. Method Semi-structured interviews combined with visual methods (timelines and relational maps) will be held with healthcare professionals (HCPs), ethnic minority patients, and their relatives to identify values steering the behavior of these actors in SDM. In addition, focus groups (FGs) will be held with ethnic minority community members to identify value structures at the group level. Respondents will be recruited through organizations with access to ethnic minorities and collaborating hospitals. Data will be analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis through the lens of Schwartz's value theory. The results of the empirical phase will be included in the RE to formulate possible adjustments of the SDM model, if needed. Discussion The integration of empirical data with ethical reflection is an innovative method in decision-making. This method enables a systematic and profound assessment of the need for adaptation of SDM and the formulation of theoretically and empirically based suggestions for adaptations of the model. Findings of this study may enrich the SDM model.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient Activation and Shared Decision-Making Among Hispanics/Latinos With Metastatic Cancer: A Qualitative Study
    Meguro, Julia
    Khawand-Azoulai, Mariana
    Medina, Heidy N.
    Pons, Magela
    Huber, Michael T.
    Penedo, Frank J.
    Moreno, Patricia I.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2025, 34 (04)
  • [42] GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study
    Nyamapfene, Taona
    Butterworth, Joanne
    Merchant, Haider
    Eaton, Mike
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73 (729): : E310 - E317
  • [43] Shared decision-making with involuntary hospital patients: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators
    Giacco, Domenico
    Mavromara, Liza
    Gamblen, Jennifer
    Conneely, Maev
    Priebe, Stefan
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2018, 4 (03): : 113 - 118
  • [44] Roles of general practitioners in shared decision-making for patients with cancer: A qualitative study
    Abma, Inger L.
    Roelofs, Lianne C. G.
    van der Kolk, Marion B.
    Mulder, Sasja F.
    Schers, Henk J.
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (04)
  • [45] Shared decision-making in psoriasis treatment: a qualitative interview study on the prescription of apremilast
    Hewitt, R.
    Bundy, C.
    Newi, A. -L.
    Chachos, E.
    Sommer, R.
    Kleyn, C. E.
    Augustin, M.
    Griffiths, C. E. M.
    Blome, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 186 (01) : E55 - E56
  • [46] Patient and clinician perspectives on shared decision-making in infertility treatment: A qualitative study
    Geng, Ling
    Shi, Zhao
    Chai, Xiao-yun
    Nie, Hong-wei
    Cong, Hong-bin
    Li, Shun Ping
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 116
  • [47] Shared decision-making in adolescent healthcare: a literature review of ethical considerations
    Sobode, Oluwaseun Rebecca
    Jegan, Roshni
    Toelen, Jaan
    Dierickx, Kris
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 183 (10) : 4195 - 4203
  • [48] Ethical implications of shared decision-making in Parkinson's disease treatment
    Estrada-Bellmann, Ingrid
    Melendez-Flores, Jesus D.
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE NEUROCIENCIA, 2020, 21 (06): : 235 - 239
  • [49] Applying ethical standards to guide shared decision-making with youth athletes
    Ardern, Clare L.
    Grindem, Hege
    Ekas, Guri Ranum
    Seil, Romain
    McNamee, Michael
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 52 (20) : 1289 - 1290
  • [50] Self-assessment of communication skills and shared decision-making among oncology trainees
    Aivas, I.
    Bourque, I. M.
    Samant, R.
    Tucker, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S14 - S14