Towards Culturally Sensitive Shared Decision-Making in Oncology A Study Protocol Integrating Bioethical Qualitative Research on Shared Decision-Making Among Ethnic Minorities With Ethical Reflection

被引:4
|
作者
Oueslati, Roukayya [1 ,2 ]
Reis, Ria [3 ,4 ]
de Vries, Martine C. [1 ]
Slager, Meralda T. [2 ]
van der Sijp, Joost R. M. [5 ]
Stiggelbout, Anne M. [6 ]
Touwen, Dorothea P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Med Eth & Hlth Law, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] The Hague Univ Appl Sci, Dept Nursing, POB 13336, NL-2501 EH The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social Sci Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] The Hague Univ Appl Sci, Res Grp Oncol Care, The Hague, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Med Decis Making, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
shared decision-making; oncology; ethnic minorities; empirical bioethics; reflective equilibrium; culturally sensitive; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT ENCOUNTER; RACIAL DISPARITIES; PATIENTS VALUES; HEALTH-CARE; GRAPHIC ELICITATION; PERSONAL VALUES; BREAST; PREFERENCES; NETHERLANDS; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1177/16094069221086731
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is often considered the ideal for decision-making in oncology. Views of specific groups such as ethnic minorities have seldom been considered in its development. Aim In this study we seek to assess in oncology if there is a need for adaptation of the current SDM model to ethnic minorities and to formulate possible adjustments. Design This study is embedded in empirical bioethics, an interdisciplinary approach integrating empirical data with ethical reasoning to formulate normative conclusions regarding a practice. For the empirical social scientific part, a cross-sectional qualitative study will be conducted; for the ethical reflection the Reflective Equilibrium will be used to develop a coherent view on the application of SDM among ethnic minorities in oncology. Method Semi-structured interviews combined with visual methods (timelines and relational maps) will be held with healthcare professionals (HCPs), ethnic minority patients, and their relatives to identify values steering the behavior of these actors in SDM. In addition, focus groups (FGs) will be held with ethnic minority community members to identify value structures at the group level. Respondents will be recruited through organizations with access to ethnic minorities and collaborating hospitals. Data will be analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis through the lens of Schwartz's value theory. The results of the empirical phase will be included in the RE to formulate possible adjustments of the SDM model, if needed. Discussion The integration of empirical data with ethical reflection is an innovative method in decision-making. This method enables a systematic and profound assessment of the need for adaptation of SDM and the formulation of theoretically and empirically based suggestions for adaptations of the model. Findings of this study may enrich the SDM model.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in oncology
    Hahlweg, P.
    Mueller, E.
    Hoffmann, J.
    Haerter, M.
    Frosch, D. L.
    Elwyn, G.
    van der Weijden, T.
    Scholl, I.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 : 23 - 23
  • [32] PATIENT-CENTRED CARE AND SHARED DECISION-MAKING IN ONCOLOGY
    Haerter, M.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (11) : 6818 - 6819
  • [33] Integrating innovation and shared decision-making in allergy and immunology practice
    Bellanti, Joseph A.
    Settipane, Russell A.
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2024, 45 (06) : 395 - 397
  • [34] Erratum to: A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology
    Kristina DemasWoodhouse
    Katie Tremont
    Anil Vachani
    Marilyn M. Schapira
    Neha Vapiwala
    Charles B. Simone
    Abigail T. Berman
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2017, 32 : 246 - 246
  • [35] Decision Aids for Shared Decision-making in Uro-oncology: A Systematic Review
    Gruene, Britta
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Lenhart, Maximilian
    Michel, Maurice S.
    Huber, Johannes
    Koether, Anja K.
    Buedenbender, Bjorn
    Alpers, Georg W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (03): : 851 - 869
  • [36] Qualitative Exploration of Triangulated, Shared Decision-Making in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Binder-Finnema, Pauline
    Dzurilla, Kathryn
    Hsiao, Betty
    Fraenkel, Liana
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2019, 71 (12) : 1576 - 1582
  • [37] Shared Decision-Making in Oncology - A Qualitative Analysis of Healthcare Providers' Views on Current Practice
    Frerichs, Wiebke
    Hahlweg, Pola
    Mueller, Evamaria
    Adis, Christine
    Scholl, Isabelle
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [38] Challenges in promoting shared decision-making: Towards a breakthrough in Japan
    Goto, Yuko
    Miura, Hisayuki
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 171 : 84 - 88
  • [39] Shared decision-making in psychiatry: a study of patient attitudes
    Nott, Josie
    Mcintosh, Aspen
    Taube, Clare
    Taylor, Mark
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 26 (05) : 478 - 481
  • [40] Vascular Access Selection Among People Receiving Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making
    Elliott, Meghan J.
    Ravani, Pietro
    Quinn, Robert R.
    MacRae, Jennifer M.
    Love, Shannan
    Oliver, Matthew J.
    Hiremath, Swapnil
    James, Matthew T.
    King-Shier, Kathryn M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 348 - 348