Towards Culturally Sensitive Shared Decision-Making in Oncology A Study Protocol Integrating Bioethical Qualitative Research on Shared Decision-Making Among Ethnic Minorities With Ethical Reflection

被引:4
|
作者
Oueslati, Roukayya [1 ,2 ]
Reis, Ria [3 ,4 ]
de Vries, Martine C. [1 ]
Slager, Meralda T. [2 ]
van der Sijp, Joost R. M. [5 ]
Stiggelbout, Anne M. [6 ]
Touwen, Dorothea P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Med Eth & Hlth Law, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] The Hague Univ Appl Sci, Dept Nursing, POB 13336, NL-2501 EH The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social Sci Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] The Hague Univ Appl Sci, Res Grp Oncol Care, The Hague, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Med Decis Making, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
shared decision-making; oncology; ethnic minorities; empirical bioethics; reflective equilibrium; culturally sensitive; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT ENCOUNTER; RACIAL DISPARITIES; PATIENTS VALUES; HEALTH-CARE; GRAPHIC ELICITATION; PERSONAL VALUES; BREAST; PREFERENCES; NETHERLANDS; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1177/16094069221086731
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is often considered the ideal for decision-making in oncology. Views of specific groups such as ethnic minorities have seldom been considered in its development. Aim In this study we seek to assess in oncology if there is a need for adaptation of the current SDM model to ethnic minorities and to formulate possible adjustments. Design This study is embedded in empirical bioethics, an interdisciplinary approach integrating empirical data with ethical reasoning to formulate normative conclusions regarding a practice. For the empirical social scientific part, a cross-sectional qualitative study will be conducted; for the ethical reflection the Reflective Equilibrium will be used to develop a coherent view on the application of SDM among ethnic minorities in oncology. Method Semi-structured interviews combined with visual methods (timelines and relational maps) will be held with healthcare professionals (HCPs), ethnic minority patients, and their relatives to identify values steering the behavior of these actors in SDM. In addition, focus groups (FGs) will be held with ethnic minority community members to identify value structures at the group level. Respondents will be recruited through organizations with access to ethnic minorities and collaborating hospitals. Data will be analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis through the lens of Schwartz's value theory. The results of the empirical phase will be included in the RE to formulate possible adjustments of the SDM model, if needed. Discussion The integration of empirical data with ethical reflection is an innovative method in decision-making. This method enables a systematic and profound assessment of the need for adaptation of SDM and the formulation of theoretically and empirically based suggestions for adaptations of the model. Findings of this study may enrich the SDM model.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The ShaDeS (Shared Decision-making in Stillbirth) study: Information, communication and shared decision-making after a stillbirth diagnosis in Italy
    Ravaldi, Claudia
    Mercuro, Chiara
    Mosconi, Laura
    Roper, Francesca
    Lotto, Lorella
    Vannacci, Alfredo
    Gavaruzzi, Teresa
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 44 (02) : NP171 - NP172
  • [22] Towards ethical decision-making in counselling research
    Robson, M
    Cook, P
    Hunt, K
    Alred, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE & COUNSELLING, 2000, 28 (04) : 533 - 547
  • [23] What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.
    Borry P.
    Schotsmans P.
    Dierickx K.
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2004, 7 (1) : 41 - 53
  • [24] Developing a Shared Decision-Making Model for Diabetic Patients: A Qualitative Study
    Vaskouei-Eshkevarei, Khorshid
    Hajinabi, Kamran
    Riahi, Leila
    Maleki, Mohammadreza
    GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 10
  • [25] Shared decision-making for women facing an unplanned pregnancy: A qualitative study
    Ueno, Yoko
    Kako, Mayumi
    Ohira, Mitsuko
    Okamura, Hitoshi
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 22 (04) : 1186 - 1196
  • [26] Patients' experiences of shared decision-making in nursing care: A qualitative study
    Van Der Ploeg-Dorhout, Marianne Paulina
    Van Den Boogaard, Charina
    Reinders-Messelink, Heleen
    Van Der Cingel, Margreet
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (06) : 2274 - 2286
  • [27] A qualitative study on shared decision-making of patients with chronic kidney disease
    Ho, Ya-Fang
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Li, I-Chuan
    NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (06): : 3430 - 3440
  • [28] Research Progress of Shared Decision-Making in Schizophrenia with Anxiety
    Sun, Jiao-jiao
    Wang, Ting
    Zhao, Ping
    Zhao, Ya-qin
    Wang, Lin
    Ye, Fei
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2024, 20 : 2095 - 2101
  • [29] Trust and shared decision-making: an emerging research agenda
    Entwistle, V
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2004, 7 (04) : 271 - 273
  • [30] Engaging Multidisciplinary Stakeholders to Drive Shared Decision-Making in Oncology
    Rocque, Gabrielle
    Miller-Sonnet, Ellen
    Balch, Alan
    Stricker, Carrie
    Seidman, Josh
    Stiles, Susan
    Ruggerio, John
    Paynter, Nancy
    Lewis, Mark
    Kamal, Arif
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 34 (01) : 29 - 31