Comparison of Two Molecular Methods for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium Difficile

被引:0
|
作者
Soh, Yun Soo [1 ]
Yang, John Jeongseok [2 ]
You, Eunkyoung [2 ]
Jeon, You La [2 ]
Kim, Min Jin [2 ]
Nam, You Sun [3 ]
Cho, Sun Young [2 ]
Park, Tae Sung [2 ]
Lee, Hee Joo [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul 130702, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Seoul 130702, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Biomed Sci, Seoul 130702, South Korea
来源
关键词
REAL-TIME PCR; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; INFECTION; ASSAY; GENE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Clostridium difficile is one of the most common causes of nosocomial diarrhea, and diagnostic methods for detecting C. difficile infection have shifted from conventional to more recent molecular techniques. This study aimed to compare the performance of two molecular assays (Meridian Illumigene (TM) and AdvanSure CD real-time PCR) in detecting C. difficile using a toxigenic culture as a reference standard. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at Kyung Hee University Hospital, a tertiary university teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea, from July 2010 to February 2011. The study used 203 fresh diarrheal stools. All fecal specimens were immediately tested by culture and the VIDAS C. difficile toxin A & B assay using an automated VIDAS immunoanalyzer. The remainder was stored at -70 degrees C until required for AdvanSure CD real-time polymerase chain reaction and Illumigene (TM). The alcohol shock procedure was then performed. Aliquots were inoculated directly on C. difficile-selective agar and blood agar and then incubated in an anaerobic jar for 48 h at 35 degrees C. The Rapid ID 32 A test was used for specifying colonies on plates. The AdvanSure CD real-time PCR was used to detect the tcdA and tcdB gene, and PCR Illumigene (TM) kits were used to detect the tcdA gene of the pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) harboring toxigenic C. difficile. Results: Of 203 clinical samples, 197 showed identical results between the two molecular assays, with a concordance rate of 97.0%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were as follows: Illumigene: 92.3, 99.4, 96.0, and 98.9, respectively; AdvanSure CD real-time PCR: 84.6, 98.3, 88.0, and 97.8, respectively. Conclusions: Both molecular assays demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, both molecular assays showed comparable results to those of a toxigenic culture, albeit with a slight decrease in test sensitivity and specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 31
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of perirectal versus rectal swabs for detection of asymptomatic carriers of toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Sakurada, Andrea
    REVISTA CHILENA DE INFECTOLOGIA, 2013, 30 (06): : 691 - 691
  • [42] Comparison of Perirectal versus Rectal Swabs for Detection of Asymptomatic Carriers of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Rogers, David S.
    Kundrapu, Sirisha
    Sunkesula, Venkata C. K.
    Donskey, Curtis J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (10) : 3421 - 3422
  • [43] Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by polymerase chain reaction
    陈村龙
    周殿元
    潘令嘉
    王继德
    邓惠欢
    Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA, 1994, (01) : 24 - 26
  • [44] NEW MOLECULAR METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE INFECTIONS
    Barbut, F.
    Lalande, V.
    Eckert, C.
    DRUGS OF TODAY, 2012, 48 (10) : 673 - 684
  • [45] Asymptomatic carriage of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by hospitalized patients
    Guerrero, D. M.
    Becker, J. C.
    Eckstein, E. C.
    Kundrapu, S.
    Deshpande, A.
    Sethi, A. K.
    Donskey, C. J.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2013, 85 (02) : 155 - 158
  • [46] Molecular methods in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: an update
    Le Guern, Remi
    Herwegh, Stephanie
    Courcol, Rene
    Wallet, Frederic
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 13 (07) : 681 - 692
  • [47] Sensitivity to antibiotics of Clostridium difficile toxigenic nosocomial strains
    Beran, Vladimir
    Chmelar, Dittmar
    Vobejdova, Jana
    Konigova, Adela
    Nemec, Jakub
    Tvrdik, Josef
    FOLIA MICROBIOLOGICA, 2014, 59 (03) : 209 - 215
  • [48] Comparison of a frozen human foreskin fibroblast cell assay to an enzyme immunoassay and toxigenic culture for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Strachan, Alastair J.
    Evans, Natalie E.
    Williams, O. Martin
    Spencer, Robert C.
    Greenwood, Rosemary
    Probert, Chris J.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2013, 75 (01) : 42 - 45
  • [49] Evaluation of Four Molecular Methods for Detection of Clostridium difficile
    Hosseini, Mojgan
    Boonlayangoor, Sue
    Frank, Karen M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 134 (03) : 496 - 496
  • [50] Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in pig feces by PCR
    Alvarez-Perez, S.
    Alba, P.
    Blanco, J. L.
    Garcia, M. E.
    VETERINARNI MEDICINA, 2009, 54 (08) : 360 - 366