Comparison of Two Molecular Methods for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium Difficile

被引:0
|
作者
Soh, Yun Soo [1 ]
Yang, John Jeongseok [2 ]
You, Eunkyoung [2 ]
Jeon, You La [2 ]
Kim, Min Jin [2 ]
Nam, You Sun [3 ]
Cho, Sun Young [2 ]
Park, Tae Sung [2 ]
Lee, Hee Joo [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul 130702, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Seoul 130702, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Biomed Sci, Seoul 130702, South Korea
来源
关键词
REAL-TIME PCR; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; INFECTION; ASSAY; GENE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Clostridium difficile is one of the most common causes of nosocomial diarrhea, and diagnostic methods for detecting C. difficile infection have shifted from conventional to more recent molecular techniques. This study aimed to compare the performance of two molecular assays (Meridian Illumigene (TM) and AdvanSure CD real-time PCR) in detecting C. difficile using a toxigenic culture as a reference standard. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at Kyung Hee University Hospital, a tertiary university teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea, from July 2010 to February 2011. The study used 203 fresh diarrheal stools. All fecal specimens were immediately tested by culture and the VIDAS C. difficile toxin A & B assay using an automated VIDAS immunoanalyzer. The remainder was stored at -70 degrees C until required for AdvanSure CD real-time polymerase chain reaction and Illumigene (TM). The alcohol shock procedure was then performed. Aliquots were inoculated directly on C. difficile-selective agar and blood agar and then incubated in an anaerobic jar for 48 h at 35 degrees C. The Rapid ID 32 A test was used for specifying colonies on plates. The AdvanSure CD real-time PCR was used to detect the tcdA and tcdB gene, and PCR Illumigene (TM) kits were used to detect the tcdA gene of the pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) harboring toxigenic C. difficile. Results: Of 203 clinical samples, 197 showed identical results between the two molecular assays, with a concordance rate of 97.0%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were as follows: Illumigene: 92.3, 99.4, 96.0, and 98.9, respectively; AdvanSure CD real-time PCR: 84.6, 98.3, 88.0, and 97.8, respectively. Conclusions: Both molecular assays demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, both molecular assays showed comparable results to those of a toxigenic culture, albeit with a slight decrease in test sensitivity and specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 31
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simultaneous outbreaks of two strains of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in a general hospital
    Kyne, L
    Merry, C
    O'Connell, B
    Harrington, P
    Keane, C
    O'Neill, D
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1998, 38 (02) : 101 - 112
  • [22] Impact of Strain Type on Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile: Comparison of Molecular Diagnostic and Enzyme Immunoassay Approaches
    Tenover, Fred C.
    Novak-Weekley, Susan
    Woods, Christopher W.
    Peterson, Lance R.
    Davis, Thomas
    Schreckenberger, Paul
    Fang, Ferric C.
    Dascal, Andre
    Gerding, Dale N.
    Nomura, Jim H.
    Goering, Richard V.
    Akerlund, Thomas
    Weissfeld, Alice S.
    Baron, Ellen Jo
    Wong, Edith
    Marlowe, Elizabeth M.
    Whitmore, Joseph
    Persing, David H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 48 (10) : 3719 - 3724
  • [23] Comparison of Illumigene C. difficile Assay and Portrait Toxigenic C. difficile Assay for the Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Pediatric Patients
    Mansilla, R.
    Blanche, R.
    Mahinan, D.
    Bard, J. Dien
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 15 (06): : 885 - 885
  • [24] Comparison between the two-step and the three-step algorithms for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Qutub, M. O.
    Albaz, N.
    Hawken, P.
    Anoos, A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 29 (03) : 293 - 296
  • [25] Comparison of two analytical methods for detecting Clostridium spores in milk
    Andrighetto, Christian
    Spolaor, Dino
    De Dea, Paola
    Fioravanzo, Elisa
    Brazzale, Piercristiano
    De Battista, Matteo
    Dolci, Elisa
    Macca, Francesca
    Sperotto, Davide
    Lombardi, Angiolella
    INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2023, 142
  • [26] A Cost-Effective Approach for Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile: Toxigenic Culture Using ChromID Clostridium difficile Agar
    Luk, Shik
    To, Wing Kin
    Ng, Tak Keung
    Hui, Wai Ting
    Lee, Wing Keung
    Lau, Florence
    Ching, Almond Man Wai
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (02) : 671 - 673
  • [27] Improving the diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection
    Calvo, Noelia
    Siller, Maria
    Luz Asensio-Calle, Maria
    De Frutos-Serna, Monica
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2012, 30 (07): : 430 - 430
  • [28] Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in paediatric patients
    Falces-Romero, Iker
    Troyano-Hernaez, Paloma
    Garcia-Bujalance, Silvia
    Baquero-Artigao, Fernando
    Jose Mellado-Pena, Maria
    Garcia-Rodriguez, Julio
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2018, 36 (06): : 357 - 361
  • [29] Transcriptional analysis of the toxigenic element of Clostridium difficile
    Hammond, GA
    Lyerly, DM
    Johnson, JL
    MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS, 1997, 22 (03) : 143 - 154
  • [30] IDENTIFICATION OF TOXIGENIC CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE BY COUNTERIMMUNOELECTROPHORESIS
    WELCH, DF
    MENGE, SK
    MATSEN, JM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1980, 11 (05) : 470 - 473