Comparison of Two Molecular Methods for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium Difficile

被引:0
|
作者
Soh, Yun Soo [1 ]
Yang, John Jeongseok [2 ]
You, Eunkyoung [2 ]
Jeon, You La [2 ]
Kim, Min Jin [2 ]
Nam, You Sun [3 ]
Cho, Sun Young [2 ]
Park, Tae Sung [2 ]
Lee, Hee Joo [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul 130702, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Seoul 130702, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Biomed Sci, Seoul 130702, South Korea
来源
关键词
REAL-TIME PCR; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; INFECTION; ASSAY; GENE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Clostridium difficile is one of the most common causes of nosocomial diarrhea, and diagnostic methods for detecting C. difficile infection have shifted from conventional to more recent molecular techniques. This study aimed to compare the performance of two molecular assays (Meridian Illumigene (TM) and AdvanSure CD real-time PCR) in detecting C. difficile using a toxigenic culture as a reference standard. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at Kyung Hee University Hospital, a tertiary university teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea, from July 2010 to February 2011. The study used 203 fresh diarrheal stools. All fecal specimens were immediately tested by culture and the VIDAS C. difficile toxin A & B assay using an automated VIDAS immunoanalyzer. The remainder was stored at -70 degrees C until required for AdvanSure CD real-time polymerase chain reaction and Illumigene (TM). The alcohol shock procedure was then performed. Aliquots were inoculated directly on C. difficile-selective agar and blood agar and then incubated in an anaerobic jar for 48 h at 35 degrees C. The Rapid ID 32 A test was used for specifying colonies on plates. The AdvanSure CD real-time PCR was used to detect the tcdA and tcdB gene, and PCR Illumigene (TM) kits were used to detect the tcdA gene of the pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) harboring toxigenic C. difficile. Results: Of 203 clinical samples, 197 showed identical results between the two molecular assays, with a concordance rate of 97.0%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were as follows: Illumigene: 92.3, 99.4, 96.0, and 98.9, respectively; AdvanSure CD real-time PCR: 84.6, 98.3, 88.0, and 97.8, respectively. Conclusions: Both molecular assays demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, both molecular assays showed comparable results to those of a toxigenic culture, albeit with a slight decrease in test sensitivity and specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 31
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Community Environmental Contamination of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Alam, M. Jahangir
    Walk, Seth T.
    Endres, Bradley T.
    Basseres, Eugenie
    Khaleduzzaman, Mohammed
    Amadio, Jonathan
    Musick, William L.
    Christensen, Jennifer L.
    Kuo, Julie
    Atmar, Robert L.
    Garey, Kevin W.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 4 (01):
  • [32] Toxigenic status of Korean Clostridium difficile isolates
    Kim, H.
    Kim, M.
    Kim, C-K.
    Yong, D.
    Lee, K.
    Chong, Y.
    Park, J-W.
    Riley, T. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S114 - S114
  • [33] Is systematic detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile useful?
    Honderlick, P
    Cahen, P
    PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE, 1998, 46 (06): : 395 - 397
  • [34] Reply to "Comparison of Detection Methods for Clostridium difficile"
    Pancholi, P.
    Kelly, C.
    Raczkowski, M.
    Balada-Llasat, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (05) : 1649 - 1649
  • [35] A two-step approach for the investigation of a Clostridium difficile outbreak by molecular methods
    Krutova, M.
    Wilcox, M. H.
    Kuijper, E. J.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 25 (11) : 1300 - 1301
  • [36] Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of two multiple testing algorithms to a real-time PCR assay
    Grigull-Daborn, A.
    Schuhholz, J.
    Eing, B.
    Sander, M.
    Boecher, O.
    Soutschek, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 302 : 148 - 148
  • [37] tcdA As a Diagnostic Target in a Loop-Mediated Amplification Assay for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Couturier, Brianne
    Schlaberg, Robert
    Konzak, Chris
    Nicholes, Jeff
    Law, Christian
    She, Rosemary C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2013, 27 (03) : 171 - 176
  • [38] Comparison of commercial molecular assays for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection in stools: BD GeneOhm Cdiff, XPert C. difficile and illumigene C. difficile
    Viala, Celine
    Le Monnier, Alban
    Maataoui, Naouale
    Rousseau, Clotilde
    Collignon, Anne
    Poilane, Isabelle
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2012, 90 (02) : 83 - 85
  • [39] ANTAGONISM OF TOXIGENIC CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE BY NONTOXIGENIC C-DIFFICILE
    WILSON, KH
    SHEAGREN, JN
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1983, 147 (04): : 733 - 736
  • [40] Occurrence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in edible bivalve molluscs
    Pasquale, V.
    Romano, V.
    Rupnik, M.
    Capuano, F.
    Bove, D.
    Aliberti, F.
    Krovacek, K.
    Dumontet, S.
    FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 31 (02) : 309 - 312