Comparison of Two Molecular Methods for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium Difficile

被引:0
|
作者
Soh, Yun Soo [1 ]
Yang, John Jeongseok [2 ]
You, Eunkyoung [2 ]
Jeon, You La [2 ]
Kim, Min Jin [2 ]
Nam, You Sun [3 ]
Cho, Sun Young [2 ]
Park, Tae Sung [2 ]
Lee, Hee Joo [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul 130702, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Seoul 130702, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Biomed Sci, Seoul 130702, South Korea
来源
关键词
REAL-TIME PCR; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; TOXIN; INFECTION; ASSAY; GENE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Clostridium difficile is one of the most common causes of nosocomial diarrhea, and diagnostic methods for detecting C. difficile infection have shifted from conventional to more recent molecular techniques. This study aimed to compare the performance of two molecular assays (Meridian Illumigene (TM) and AdvanSure CD real-time PCR) in detecting C. difficile using a toxigenic culture as a reference standard. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at Kyung Hee University Hospital, a tertiary university teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea, from July 2010 to February 2011. The study used 203 fresh diarrheal stools. All fecal specimens were immediately tested by culture and the VIDAS C. difficile toxin A & B assay using an automated VIDAS immunoanalyzer. The remainder was stored at -70 degrees C until required for AdvanSure CD real-time polymerase chain reaction and Illumigene (TM). The alcohol shock procedure was then performed. Aliquots were inoculated directly on C. difficile-selective agar and blood agar and then incubated in an anaerobic jar for 48 h at 35 degrees C. The Rapid ID 32 A test was used for specifying colonies on plates. The AdvanSure CD real-time PCR was used to detect the tcdA and tcdB gene, and PCR Illumigene (TM) kits were used to detect the tcdA gene of the pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) harboring toxigenic C. difficile. Results: Of 203 clinical samples, 197 showed identical results between the two molecular assays, with a concordance rate of 97.0%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were as follows: Illumigene: 92.3, 99.4, 96.0, and 98.9, respectively; AdvanSure CD real-time PCR: 84.6, 98.3, 88.0, and 97.8, respectively. Conclusions: Both molecular assays demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, both molecular assays showed comparable results to those of a toxigenic culture, albeit with a slight decrease in test sensitivity and specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 31
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-laboratory comparison of two molecular methods for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Halstead, Diane C.
    Abid, Joan
    Sloan, Lynne
    Meza, Diana
    Ramsey-Walker, Daphne
    Hata, D. Jane
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2016, 10 (01): : 62 - 67
  • [2] Comparison of Detection Methods for the Rapid Identification of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Kryvenko, O. N.
    Samuel, L. P.
    Tibbetts, R. J.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 : 334A - 334A
  • [3] Molecular methods for detecting and typing of Clostridium difficile
    Collins, Deirdre A.
    Elliott, Briony
    Riley, Thomas V.
    PATHOLOGY, 2015, 47 (03) : 211 - 218
  • [4] Comparison of Detection Methods for the Rapid Identification of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Kryvenko, O. N.
    Samuel, L. P.
    Tibbetts, R. J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2010, 90 : 334A - 334A
  • [5] Comparison of antigen and two molecular methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins
    Ylisiurua, Pirkko
    Koskela, Markku
    Vainio, Olli
    Tuokko, Hanna
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 45 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [6] Molecular epidemiology of toxigenic Clostridium difficile isolates in Korea
    Cho, S. Y.
    Nam, Y.
    Soh, Y. S.
    Park, T. S.
    Lee, H. J.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2014, 142 (08): : 1651 - 1652
  • [7] Molecular Strain Typing and Characterisation of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Dingle, Tanis C.
    MacCannell, Duncan R.
    CURRENT AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MICROBIAL INFECTIONS, 2015, 42 : 329 - 357
  • [8] Comparison of Diagnostic Algorithms for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Routine Practice at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Korea
    Moon, Hee-Won
    Kim, Hyeong Nyeon
    Hur, Mina
    Shim, Hee Sook
    Kim, Heejung
    Yun, Yeo-Min
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [9] Prospective evaluation of four methods for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Paule, S. M.
    Thomson, R. B.
    Hacek, D. M.
    Manson, R.
    Villa, I.
    Kaul, K.
    Peterson, L. R.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2006, 8 (05): : 653 - 653
  • [10] Molecular Characterization of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in a Northern Italian Hospital
    De Rosa, Francesco G.
    Cavallerio, Paolo
    Corcione, Silvia
    Parlato, Caterina
    Fossati, Lucina
    Serra, Roberto
    Di Perri, Giovanni
    Cavallo, Rossana
    CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (02) : 154 - 155