Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage

被引:89
|
作者
Yang, Bo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wei, Yi-Ming [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hou, Yunbing [1 ]
Li, Hui [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Pengtao [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Energy & Min Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biomass; Co-firing; Environmental impact; LCA; CCS; COMBUSTION POWER-PLANT; CARBON CAPTURE; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; OPPORTUNITIES; TORREFACTION; CHALLENGES; TRANSPORT; ECONOMICS; CCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113483
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As a carbon-neutral renewable energy source, biomass co-firing with coal contributes to reducing the carbon intensity of pulverized coal power plants with CO2 capture and storage; thus, this process significantly reduces the greenhouse gas emissions of the power industry. However, various types of environmental impacts caused by co-firing have hindered the large-scale deployment of this technology. In this study, ten life cycle assessment models were developed based on the Integrated Environmental Control Model and GaBi software to quantify the performance parameters of different power plants and the influence of the co-firing ratio on various environmental impact categories. The system boundaries included raw material acquisition, raw material transport, energy conversion of power plants, CCS and brine treatment. The results indicated that a pulverized biomass/coal co-firing power plant with CCS can achieve nearzero emissions at a co-firing ratio of 25% and negative emissions of 877 kg CO2-e/MWh from a life-cycle perspective when coal is totally replaced. Co-firing biomass and coal in power plants has a passive impact on seven environmental categories, such as the eutrophication potential and toxicity potential, rather than on the global warming potential, abiotic resource depletion potential and acidification potential. The major causes of environmental burden shifting are energy penalties and indirect emissions from high-energy-consumption processes, especially emissions of N2O, NH3 and ethylene oxide released during biomass extraction and solvent preparation. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this paper may have implications for deep decarbonization in other industrial sectors.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of Taean coal power plant with CO2 capture module
    Jung, Han Sol
    Ryoo, Seung Gul
    Kang, Yong Tae
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 357
  • [22] Life Cycle Assessment of a Co-Firing Power Generation System in China
    Wu, Jinzhuo
    Kong, Linlin
    Wang, Lihai
    Sun, Yaqi
    JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [23] Co-firing in coal power plants and its impact on biomass feedstock availability
    Dumortier, Jerome
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 60 : 396 - 405
  • [24] Retrofitted carbon capture and storage for negative emissions in China's co-firing plants
    Zhang, Xian
    Fan, Jing-Li
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 13 (08) : 772 - 773
  • [25] The environmental perspective on biomass co-firing operations at coal-fired power plants in the Banten region, Indonesia: a life cycle approach
    Febijanto, Irhan
    Rosmeika, Rosmeika
    Nadirah, Nadirah
    Yanuar, Ahmad Ismed
    Sihombing, Adolf Leopold
    Susila, I. Made Agus Dharma
    Bahua, Hismiaty
    Kurniawati, Inna Zulfa
    Barkah, Arief
    Santoso, Arif Dwi
    Herdioso, Rudi
    Rustianto, Bambang
    Oktaufik, M. A. M.
    Suryana, Yaya
    Syamsudin, Edy
    Aditiyawan, Aditiyawan
    Gazali, Nizam
    Soedjati, Dadi
    Soleh, Mochamad
    ENERGY ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 9 (04) : 439 - 454
  • [26] Life Cycle Economic and Environmental Assessment of Producing Synthetic Jet Fuel Using CO2/Biomass Feedstocks
    Saad, Dimitri M.
    Terlouw, Tom
    Sacchi, Romain
    Bauer, Christian
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (21) : 9158 - 9174
  • [28] TOWARDS LOW EMISSION POWER PANTS: BIOMASS CO-FIRING COMBINED WITH POST-COMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE
    Cebrucean, Dumitru
    Cebrucean, Viorica
    Ionel, Ioana
    PAPERS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2014, : 749 - 753
  • [29] A coal-fired power plant integrated with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture for zero carbon emission
    Xue, Xiaojun
    Wang, Yuting
    Chen, Heng
    Xu, Gang
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY, 2022, 16 (02) : 307 - 320
  • [30] Influence of gas and detrimental metal emissions from biomass firing and co-firing on environmental impact
    Demirbas, A
    ENERGY SOURCES, 2005, 27 (15): : 1419 - 1428