Life Cycle Assessment of a Co-Firing Power Generation System in China

被引:5
|
作者
Wu, Jinzhuo [1 ]
Kong, Linlin [1 ]
Wang, Lihai [2 ]
Sun, Yaqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Forestry Univ, Coll Engn & Technol, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
[2] Northeast Forestry Univ, Grad Sch, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coal; Biomass; Co-Firing; Energy Consumption; Pollutant Emission;
D O I
10.1166/jbmb.2016.1574
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Coal and biomass co-firing for power generation can effectively reduce the emissions of CO2 and SO2, which is an economically feasible technology in near term. In this paper, the life cycle assessment (LCA) method was applied on a coal and biomass co-firing project (5% biomass, on an energy basis) and an inventory analysis was conducted on fuel acquisition, fuel transportation, and power plant operation. The fuel consumption and the environmental impacts were calculated for these phases, respectively. Results showed that the total energy input for 10,000 kWh electric power generated by the co-firing system was 108,188.29 MJ. Coal is the major part of all the resources consumed. The greenhouse gas emissions for 10,000 kWh power include CO2 9,190.22 kg, smoke/soot 751.53 kg, SO2 32.61 kg, NOx 32.14 kg, and CH4 30.85 kg. Compared to coal-burning power generation, the co-firing system can reduce the emission of CO2 by 0.0810 kg per kWh or 8.10%. The total environmental impact load was 29.02 standard per capita equivalent (PE) and the main impact on environment was from the emission of dust. If the dust can be appropriately managed, the environmental impact load can also be effectively reduced.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of rice straw co-firing with coal power generation in Malaysia
    Shafie, S. M.
    Mahlia, T. M. I.
    Masjuki, H. H.
    ENERGY, 2013, 57 : 284 - 294
  • [2] Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass co-firing plants with carbon capture and storage
    Schakel, Wouter
    Meerman, Hans
    Talaei, Alireza
    Ramirez, Andrea
    Faaij, Andre
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 131 : 441 - 467
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of co-firing coal and wood pellets in the Southeastern United States
    Morrison, Brandon
    Golden, Jay S.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 150 : 188 - 196
  • [4] Economic feasibility assessment of coal-biomass co-firing power generation technology
    Zhang, Yun-Long
    Liu, Lan-Cui
    Kang, Jia-Ning
    Peng, Song
    Mi, Zhifu
    Liao, Hua
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    ENERGY, 2024, 296
  • [5] Life cycle cost assessment of biomass co-firing power plants with CO2 capture and storage considering multiple incentives
    Yang, Bo
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    Liu, Lan-Cui
    Hou, Yun-Bing
    Zhang, Kun
    Yang, Lai
    Feng, Ye
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 96
  • [6] Energy Analysis of a Biomass Co-firing Based Pulverized Coal Power Generation System
    Mehmood, Shoaib
    Reddy, Bale V.
    Rosen, Marc A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (04): : 462 - 490
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of direct co-firing of torrefied and/or pelletised woody biomass with coal in The Netherlands
    Tsalidis, Georgios-Archimidis
    Joshi, Yash
    Korevaar, Gijsbert
    de Jong, Wiebren
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 81 : 168 - 177
  • [8] Exergy Analysis of a Biomass Co-Firing Based Pulverized Coal Power Generation System
    Mehmood, Shoaib
    Reddy, Bale V.
    Rosen, Marc A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2015, 12 (05) : 461 - 478
  • [9] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF RICE HULL - COAL CO-FIRING FOR PORTLAND CEMENT CLINKER PRODUCTION
    Joseph Mariano, Daniel
    Biona, Jose Bienvenido Manuel M.
    Gonzaga, Jeremias A.
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANOID, NANOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL, ENVIRONMENT AND MANAGEMENT (HNICEM), 2014,
  • [10] Assessment of Biomass Co-Firing Potentials in Coal Power Plants
    Garcia-Galindo, Daniel
    Royo, Francisco Javier
    Sebastian, Fernando
    STROJARSTVO, 2010, 52 (04): : 411 - 427