Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage

被引:89
|
作者
Yang, Bo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wei, Yi-Ming [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hou, Yunbing [1 ]
Li, Hui [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Pengtao [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Energy & Min Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100181, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biomass; Co-firing; Environmental impact; LCA; CCS; COMBUSTION POWER-PLANT; CARBON CAPTURE; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; OPPORTUNITIES; TORREFACTION; CHALLENGES; TRANSPORT; ECONOMICS; CCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113483
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As a carbon-neutral renewable energy source, biomass co-firing with coal contributes to reducing the carbon intensity of pulverized coal power plants with CO2 capture and storage; thus, this process significantly reduces the greenhouse gas emissions of the power industry. However, various types of environmental impacts caused by co-firing have hindered the large-scale deployment of this technology. In this study, ten life cycle assessment models were developed based on the Integrated Environmental Control Model and GaBi software to quantify the performance parameters of different power plants and the influence of the co-firing ratio on various environmental impact categories. The system boundaries included raw material acquisition, raw material transport, energy conversion of power plants, CCS and brine treatment. The results indicated that a pulverized biomass/coal co-firing power plant with CCS can achieve nearzero emissions at a co-firing ratio of 25% and negative emissions of 877 kg CO2-e/MWh from a life-cycle perspective when coal is totally replaced. Co-firing biomass and coal in power plants has a passive impact on seven environmental categories, such as the eutrophication potential and toxicity potential, rather than on the global warming potential, abiotic resource depletion potential and acidification potential. The major causes of environmental burden shifting are energy penalties and indirect emissions from high-energy-consumption processes, especially emissions of N2O, NH3 and ethylene oxide released during biomass extraction and solvent preparation. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this paper may have implications for deep decarbonization in other industrial sectors.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A coal-fired power plant integrated with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture for zero carbon emission
    Xiaojun Xue
    Yuting Wang
    Heng Chen
    Gang Xu
    Frontiers in Energy, 2022, 16 : 307 - 320
  • [32] CO2 Capture and Storage from Fossil Fuel Power Plants
    Cebrucean, Dumitru
    Cebrucean, Viorica
    Ionel, Ioana
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 18 - 26
  • [33] Life Cycle Assessment of Torrefied Residual Biomass Co-Firing in Coal-Fired Power Plants: Aspects of Carbon Dioxide Emission
    Cho, Kyungil
    Lee, Yongwoon
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (23)
  • [34] Environmental impact of an agro-waste based polygeneration without and with CO2 storage: Life cycle assessment approach
    Jana, Kuntal
    De, Sudipta
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 216 : 931 - 940
  • [35] Life cycle approach for energy and environmental analysis of biomass and coal co-firing in CHP plant with backpressure turbine
    Zuwala, Jaroslaw
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 35 : 164 - 175
  • [36] A framework for environmental assessment of CO2 capture and storage systems
    Sathre, Roger
    Chester, Mikhail
    Cain, Jennifer
    Masanet, Eric
    ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 540 - 548
  • [37] Investigation on the Synergetic Effect of Biomass Co-Firing in the Atmosphere of O2/CO2
    Wang, Xuebin
    Hu, Zhongfa
    Deng, Shuanghui
    Wang, Yibing
    Wei, Bo
    Tan, Houzhang
    JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY, 2014, 8 (05) : 481 - 488
  • [38] LIFE CYCLE APPROACH FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BIOMASS AND COAL CO-FIRING IN DIFFERENT LARGE SCALE CO-GENERATION UNITS
    Zuwala, Jaroslaw
    PAPERS OF THE 25TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE, 2017, : 1707 - 1716
  • [39] Life Cycle Assessment Based Process Design of CO2 Capture Options
    Tock, Laurence
    Marechal, Francois
    24TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS A AND B, 2014, 33 : 1033 - 1038
  • [40] Co-firing plants with retrofitted carbon capture and storage for power-sector emissions mitigation
    Jing-Li Fan
    Jingying Fu
    Xian Zhang
    Kai Li
    Wenlong Zhou
    Klaus Hubacek
    Johannes Urpelainen
    Shuo Shen
    Shiyan Chang
    Siyue Guo
    Xi Lu
    Nature Climate Change, 2023, 13 : 807 - 815