Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Kuisma, Anna [1 ]
Ranta, Iiro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Keyrilainen, Jani [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Suilamo, Sami [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Pauliina [1 ,2 ]
Pesola, Marko [4 ]
Warner, Lizette [5 ]
Loyttyniemi, Eliisa [6 ]
Minn, Heikki [1 ]
机构
[1] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol & Radiotherapy, Hameentie 11, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Hameentie 11, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Dept Phys & Astron, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[4] Philips MR Therapy Oy, Ayritie 4, FI-01510 Vantaa, Finland
[5] Philips MR Oncol, 3000 Minuteman Rd, Andover, MA 01810 USA
[6] Univ Turku, Dept Biostat, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 13卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; MRI; Auto-segmentation; Delineation; Radiotherapy planning; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2020.02.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radiation therapy planning of PC. Material and methods: Pelvic structures of 65 PC patients delineated in an MRI-only workflow according to established guidelines were included in the analysis. Automatic vs manual segmentation by an experienced oncologist was compared with geometrical parameters, such as the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Fifteen patients had a second MRI within 15 days to assess repeatability of the AST for prostate and seminal vesicles. Furthermore, we investigated whether hormonal therapy or body mass index (BMI) affected the AST results. Results: The AST showed high agreement with manual segmentation expressed as DSC (mean, SD) for delineating prostate (0.84, 0.04), bladder (0.92, 0.04) and rectum (0.86, 0.04). For seminal vesicles (0.56, 0.17) and penile bulb (0.69, 0.12) the respective agreement was moderate. Performance of AST was not influenced by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, although those on treatment had significantly smaller prostates than the hormone-naive patients (p < 0.0001). In repeat assessment, consistency of prostate delineation resulted in mean DSC of 0.89, (SD 0.03) between the paired MRI scans for AST, while mean DSC of manual delineation was 0.82, (SD 0.05). Conclusion: Fully automated MRI segmentation tool showed good agreement and repeatability compared with manual segmentation and was found clinically robust in patients with PC. However, manual review and adjustment of some structures in individual cases remain important in clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 20
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation of an automated contouring and treatment planning tool for pediatric craniospinal radiation therapy
    Hernandez, Soleil
    Burger, Hester
    Nguyen, Callistus
    Paulino, Arnold C.
    Lucas, John T.
    Faught, Austin M.
    Duryea, Jack
    Netherton, Tucker
    Rhee, Dong Joo
    Cardenas, Carlos
    Howell, Rebecca
    Fuentes, David
    Pollard-Larkin, Julianne
    Court, Laurence
    Parkes, Jeannette
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [42] Survey of denoising, segmentation and classification of magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer
    Mamta Juneja
    Sumindar Kaur Saini
    Jatin Gupta
    Poojita Garg
    Niharika Thakur
    Aviral Sharma
    Manan Mehta
    Prashant Jindal
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2021, 80 : 29199 - 29249
  • [43] Survey of denoising, segmentation and classification of magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer
    Juneja, Mamta
    Saini, Sumindar Kaur
    Gupta, Jatin
    Garg, Poojita
    Thakur, Niharika
    Sharma, Aviral
    Mehta, Manan
    Jindal, Prashant
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 80 (19) : 29199 - 29249
  • [44] Automated treatment planning of volumetric arc therapy for patient with prostate cancer
    Olminska, M.
    Skrobala, A.
    Pawalowski, B.
    Piotrowski, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1020 - S1020
  • [45] Automated detection of aggressive and indolent prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging
    Seetharaman, Arun
    Bhattacharya, Indrani
    Chen, Leo C.
    Kunder, Christian A.
    Shao, Wei
    Soerensen, Simon J. C.
    Wang, Jeffrey B.
    Teslovich, Nikola C.
    Fan, Richard E.
    Ghanouni, Pejman
    Brooks, James D.
    Too, Katherine J.
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Rusu, Mirabela
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06) : 2960 - 2972
  • [46] Assessment of planning target volume margins in 1.5 T magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Yang, Bin
    Yuan, Jing
    Poon, Darren M. C.
    Geng, Hui
    Lam, Wai Wang
    Cheung, Kin Yin
    Yu, Siu Ki
    PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 6 (02): : 127 - 135
  • [47] The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance in Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiation Therapy Planning for Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Study
    Sardaro, Angela
    Turi, Barbara
    Bardoscia, Lilia
    Ferrari, Cristina
    Rubini, Giuseppe
    Calabrese, Angela
    Ammirati, Federica
    Grillo, Antonietta
    Leo, Annamaria
    Lorusso, Filomenamila
    Santorsola, Antonio
    Stabile Ianora, Antonio Amato
    Scardapane, Arnaldo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10
  • [48] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging - a crucial imaging tool for considering and planning prostate cancer focal therapy
    Dudderidge, Tim J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 128 (02) : 125 - 126
  • [49] Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging derived synthetic computed tomography for proton therapy planning in prostate cancer
    Fridstrom, Kajsa M. L.
    Winter, Rene M.
    Hornik, Natalie
    Almberg, Sigrun S.
    Danielsen, Signe
    Redalen, Kathrine R.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31
  • [50] Image segmentation in treatment planning for prostate cancer using the region growing technique
    Mazonakis, M
    Damilakis, J
    Varveris, H
    Prassopoulos, P
    Gourtsoyiannis, N
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 74 (879): : 243 - 248