Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Kuisma, Anna [1 ]
Ranta, Iiro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Keyrilainen, Jani [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Suilamo, Sami [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Pauliina [1 ,2 ]
Pesola, Marko [4 ]
Warner, Lizette [5 ]
Loyttyniemi, Eliisa [6 ]
Minn, Heikki [1 ]
机构
[1] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol & Radiotherapy, Hameentie 11, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Hameentie 11, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Dept Phys & Astron, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[4] Philips MR Therapy Oy, Ayritie 4, FI-01510 Vantaa, Finland
[5] Philips MR Oncol, 3000 Minuteman Rd, Andover, MA 01810 USA
[6] Univ Turku, Dept Biostat, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
关键词
Prostate cancer; MRI; Auto-segmentation; Delineation; Radiotherapy planning; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2020.02.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radiation therapy planning of PC. Material and methods: Pelvic structures of 65 PC patients delineated in an MRI-only workflow according to established guidelines were included in the analysis. Automatic vs manual segmentation by an experienced oncologist was compared with geometrical parameters, such as the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Fifteen patients had a second MRI within 15 days to assess repeatability of the AST for prostate and seminal vesicles. Furthermore, we investigated whether hormonal therapy or body mass index (BMI) affected the AST results. Results: The AST showed high agreement with manual segmentation expressed as DSC (mean, SD) for delineating prostate (0.84, 0.04), bladder (0.92, 0.04) and rectum (0.86, 0.04). For seminal vesicles (0.56, 0.17) and penile bulb (0.69, 0.12) the respective agreement was moderate. Performance of AST was not influenced by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, although those on treatment had significantly smaller prostates than the hormone-naive patients (p < 0.0001). In repeat assessment, consistency of prostate delineation resulted in mean DSC of 0.89, (SD 0.03) between the paired MRI scans for AST, while mean DSC of manual delineation was 0.82, (SD 0.05). Conclusion: Fully automated MRI segmentation tool showed good agreement and repeatability compared with manual segmentation and was found clinically robust in patients with PC. However, manual review and adjustment of some structures in individual cases remain important in clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 20
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of CBCT-Based Machine-Learning Automated Planning for Adaptive Prostate Radiation Therapy
    Khalifa, A.
    Golshan, M.
    Navarro, I.
    Malkov, V.
    McIntosh, C.
    Purdie, T.
    Tadic, T.
    Winter, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E246 - E246
  • [22] Validation of an Atlas RTOG Consistent for Automated Contouring in Radiation Therapy Planning for High Risk Prostate Cancers
    Naga, A. F.
    Bahadur, Y. A.
    Eltaher, M. M.
    Attar, M. A.
    Constantinescu, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E578 - E578
  • [23] The use of an active appearance model for automated prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance
    Korsager, Anne Sofie
    Stephansen, Ulrik Landberg
    Carl, Jesper
    Ostergaard, Lasse Riis
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (07) : 1374 - 1377
  • [24] A Deep Learning-Based Automated CT Segmentation of Prostate Cancer Anatomy for Radiation Therapy Planning-A Retrospective Multicenter Study
    Kiljunen, Timo
    Akram, Saad
    Niemela, Jarkko
    Loyttyniemi, Eliisa
    Seppala, Jan
    Heikkila, Janne
    Vuolukka, Kristiina
    Kaariainen, Okko-Sakari
    Heikkila, Vesa-Pekka
    Lehtio, Kaisa
    Nikkinen, Juha
    Gershkevitsh, Eduard
    Borkvel, Anni
    Adamson, Merve
    Zolotuhhin, Daniil
    Kolk, Kati
    Pang, Eric Pei Ping
    Tuan, Jeffrey Kit Loong
    Master, Zubin
    Chua, Melvin Lee Kiang
    Joensuu, Timo
    Kononen, Juha
    Myllykangas, Mikko
    Riener, Maigo
    Mokka, Miia
    Keyrilainen, Jani
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (11)
  • [25] Automated treatment planning for prostate cancer HIFU therapy
    Fedewa, RJ
    Seip, R
    Carlson, RF
    Chen, WS
    Sanghvi, NT
    Penna, MA
    Dines, KA
    Pfile, RE
    2005 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Vols 1-4, 2005, : 1135 - 1138
  • [26] The Role of Offline Adaptive Planning in Online Image Guided Radiation Therapy of Prostate Cancer
    Wu, Q.
    Liu, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S836 - S836
  • [27] Radiation therapy planning and simulation with magnetic resonance images
    Boettger, Thomas
    Nyholm, Tufve
    Karlsson, Magnus
    Nunna, Chandrasekhar
    Celi, Juan Carlos
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: VISUALIZATION, IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, AND MODELING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 6918
  • [28] Watershed-based brain magnetic resonance image automated segmentation
    Song, Li-Wei
    Song, Chao-Yun
    Zhuang, Tian-Ge
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2003, 37 (11): : 1754 - 1756
  • [29] Simulation-free magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer
    Warda, Cora
    Gani, Cihan
    Boeke, Simon
    Moennich, David
    Schneider, Moritz
    Niyazi, Maximilian
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 32
  • [30] PET and Radiation Therapy Planning and Delivery for Prostate Cancer
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Lin, Alexander
    PET CLINICS, 2009, 4 (02) : 193 - +