Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Kuisma, Anna [1 ]
Ranta, Iiro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Keyrilainen, Jani [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Suilamo, Sami [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Pauliina [1 ,2 ]
Pesola, Marko [4 ]
Warner, Lizette [5 ]
Loyttyniemi, Eliisa [6 ]
Minn, Heikki [1 ]
机构
[1] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol & Radiotherapy, Hameentie 11, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Hameentie 11, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Dept Phys & Astron, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[4] Philips MR Therapy Oy, Ayritie 4, FI-01510 Vantaa, Finland
[5] Philips MR Oncol, 3000 Minuteman Rd, Andover, MA 01810 USA
[6] Univ Turku, Dept Biostat, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
关键词
Prostate cancer; MRI; Auto-segmentation; Delineation; Radiotherapy planning; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2020.02.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radiation therapy planning of PC. Material and methods: Pelvic structures of 65 PC patients delineated in an MRI-only workflow according to established guidelines were included in the analysis. Automatic vs manual segmentation by an experienced oncologist was compared with geometrical parameters, such as the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Fifteen patients had a second MRI within 15 days to assess repeatability of the AST for prostate and seminal vesicles. Furthermore, we investigated whether hormonal therapy or body mass index (BMI) affected the AST results. Results: The AST showed high agreement with manual segmentation expressed as DSC (mean, SD) for delineating prostate (0.84, 0.04), bladder (0.92, 0.04) and rectum (0.86, 0.04). For seminal vesicles (0.56, 0.17) and penile bulb (0.69, 0.12) the respective agreement was moderate. Performance of AST was not influenced by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, although those on treatment had significantly smaller prostates than the hormone-naive patients (p < 0.0001). In repeat assessment, consistency of prostate delineation resulted in mean DSC of 0.89, (SD 0.03) between the paired MRI scans for AST, while mean DSC of manual delineation was 0.82, (SD 0.05). Conclusion: Fully automated MRI segmentation tool showed good agreement and repeatability compared with manual segmentation and was found clinically robust in patients with PC. However, manual review and adjustment of some structures in individual cases remain important in clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 20
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy Validation of an Automated Method for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Maysam Shahedi
    Derek W. Cool
    Glenn S. Bauman
    Matthew Bastian-Jordan
    Aaron Fenster
    Aaron D. Ward
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2017, 30 : 782 - 795
  • [2] Accuracy Validation of an Automated Method for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Shahedi, Maysam
    Cool, Derek W.
    Bauman, Glenn S.
    Bastian-Jordan, Matthew
    Fenster, Aaron
    Ward, Aaron D.
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2017, 30 (06) : 782 - 795
  • [3] Validation of Automated Segmentation Algorithms for Clinical Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning
    Watkins, W.
    Du, D.
    Qing, K.
    Liu, J.
    Ladbury, C.
    Liu, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [4] A magnetic resonance imaging-based workflow for planning radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Greer, Peter B.
    Dowling, Jason A.
    Lambert, Jonathon A.
    Fripp, Jurgen
    Parker, Joel
    Denham, James W.
    Wratten, Chris
    Capp, Anne
    Salvado, Olivier
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2011, 194 (04) : S24 - S27
  • [5] Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Bed Radiation Therapy Planning Useful?
    Barkati, M.
    Delouya, G.
    Simard, D.
    Taussky, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E564 - E565
  • [6] Magnetic Resonance-Only Workflow and Validation of Magnetic Resonance-Based Dose Calculations for Radiation Therapy of Prostate Cancer
    Christiansen, R. L.
    Jensen, H. R.
    Brink, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E645 - E645
  • [7] Magnetic resonance image-based tomotherapy planning for prostate cancer
    Jung, Sang Hoon
    Kim, Jinsung
    Chung, Yoonsun
    Keserci, Bilgin
    Pyo, Hongryull
    Park, Hee Chul
    Park, Won
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 38 (01): : 52 - 59
  • [8] Fast cine-magnetic resonance imaging point tracking for prostate cancer radiation therapy planning
    Dowling, J.
    Dang, K.
    Fox, Chris D.
    Chandra, S.
    Gill, Suki
    Kron, T.
    Pham, D.
    Foroudi, F.
    XVII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY (ICCR 2013), 2014, 489
  • [9] Magnetic resonance image guidance in external beam radiation therapy planning and delivery
    Arivarasan, Ilamurugu
    Anuradha, Chandrasekaran
    Subramanian, Shanmuga
    Anantharaman, Ayyalusamy
    Ramasubramanian, Velayudham
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 35 (08) : 417 - 426
  • [10] Magnetic resonance image guidance in external beam radiation therapy planning and delivery
    Ilamurugu Arivarasan
    Chandrasekaran Anuradha
    Shanmuga Subramanian
    Ayyalusamy Anantharaman
    Velayudham Ramasubramanian
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2017, 35 : 417 - 426