Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review

被引:46
|
作者
Manso, Maria A. [1 ]
Guittet, Catherine [1 ]
Vandenhende, Francois [2 ]
Granier, Luc-Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Advicenne, Clin Affairs, 2 Rue Briconnet, F-30000 Nimes, France
[2] ClinBay, Stat, Genappe, Belgium
关键词
benzodiazepines; clinical efficacy; hypnotics and sedatives; pediatrics; preanesthetic medication; randomized trials; LOW-DOSE COMBINATION; PREOPERATIVE ANXIETY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; NITROUS-OXIDE; PREMEDICATION; KETAMINE; TRIAL; RELIABILITY; INTRANASAL; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.13747
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
One of the most widely used options for minimal/moderate sedation in pediatric patients is oral midazolam, as it presents an alternative to less well-accepted routes of administration (eg, intravenous or intranasal) of this well-known efficacious and well-tolerated short-acting benzodiazepine. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to identify clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric patients in the context of premedication before anesthesia or during diagnostic/treatment procedures. The percentage of responders (response rate) after single administration of oral midazolam was evaluated and compared versus placebo in a subset of placebo-controlled studies. The range of oral midazolam doses providing effective sedation in the different pediatric age subsets was analyzed in order to assess optimum dosing strategies. A total of 25 pediatric clinical studies, utilizing a variety of measures of sedation effectiveness, were selected. These studies included a total of 1472 patients (aged 4 months-18 years) treated with midazolam (0.25-1.5 mg/kg) and 138 patients treated with placebo. The response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranged from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%], while with placebo response rates ranged from 4.0% [0.6%, 23.5%] to 41.0% [29.4%, 53.6%]. When considering the 4 placebo-controlled studies, the odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for the comparison of midazolam vs. placebo ranged from 13.4 [5.0, 36.0] to 25.9 [6.7, 100.6]. The analysis of subgroups by context of sedation showed response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranging from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.0% [94.8%, 98.3%] for anesthetic premedication and from 56.1% [43.1%, 68.4] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%] for medical procedures. The efficacy of midazolam for pediatric minimal/moderate sedation from a dose of 0.25 mg/kg and above was demonstrated. The probability of occurrence of adverse events and over-sedation increases with increasing doses.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1106
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy Outcome Measures for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials: An ACTTION Systematic Review
    Williams, Mark R.
    Nayshtut, Michael
    Hoefnagel, Amie
    McKeown, Andrew
    Carlson, Douglas W.
    Cravero, Joseph
    Lightdale, Jenifer
    Mason, Keira P.
    Wilson, Stephen
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    Ward, Denham S.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2018, 126 (03): : 956 - 967
  • [42] Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
    Conway, Aaron
    Chang, Kristina
    Mafeld, Sebastian
    Sutherland, Joanna
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [43] Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
    Aaron Conway
    Kristina Chang
    Sebastian Mafeld
    Joanna Sutherland
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [44] Effectiveness of Oral Ketamine, Midazolam, and Atropine Cocktail Versus Oral Diphenhydramine for Pediatric Sedation in the Emergency Department
    Soleimanpour, Hassan
    Mahmoodpoor, Ata
    Milani, Farid Eftekhari
    Nia, Kavous Shahsavari
    Esfanjani, Robab Mehdizadeh
    Safari, Saeid
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 16 (09)
  • [45] CONSCIOUS SEDATION WITH MIDAZOLAM NOSE DROPS FOR ECHOCARDIOGRAMS IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS
    RUMMELL, HM
    TESKE, DW
    ALLEN, HD
    CIRCULATION, 1992, 86 (04) : 500 - 500
  • [46] Effect of Sedation with Midazolam and Time to Discharge among Pediatric Dental Patients
    Blumer, Sigalit
    Peretz, Benjamin
    Zisman, Gali
    Ratson, Tal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 41 (05) : 384 - 387
  • [47] Serum concentration of oral midazolam as pediatric preanesthetic medication and factors related to the sedation level
    Matsuda, Hiromi
    Takenaka, Jungo
    Kawabata, Mariko
    Komatsu, Toshiaki
    Sakanoue, Kazumi
    Atsuda, Koichiro
    Okamoto, Hirotsugu
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 66 (07) : 818 - 822
  • [48] Comparison of Oral and Buccal Midazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Clinical Trial for Efficacy, Acceptance and Safety
    Tavassoli-Hojjati, Sara
    Mehran, Majid
    Haghgoo, Roza
    Tohid-Rahbari, Monireh
    Ahmadi, Rahil
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2014, 24 (02) : 198 - 206
  • [49] A comparation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wen, Jiaxuan
    Ding, Xueying
    Liu, Chen
    Jiang, Wenyu
    Xu, Yingrui
    Wei, Xiuhong
    Liu, Xin
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [50] A Narrative Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Ketamine in Pediatric Sedation: A Critical Analysis of Current Evidence
    Dasari, Lakshmi Naga Sai Sivani
    Ninave, Sanjot
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)