Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review

被引:46
|
作者
Manso, Maria A. [1 ]
Guittet, Catherine [1 ]
Vandenhende, Francois [2 ]
Granier, Luc-Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Advicenne, Clin Affairs, 2 Rue Briconnet, F-30000 Nimes, France
[2] ClinBay, Stat, Genappe, Belgium
关键词
benzodiazepines; clinical efficacy; hypnotics and sedatives; pediatrics; preanesthetic medication; randomized trials; LOW-DOSE COMBINATION; PREOPERATIVE ANXIETY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; NITROUS-OXIDE; PREMEDICATION; KETAMINE; TRIAL; RELIABILITY; INTRANASAL; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.13747
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
One of the most widely used options for minimal/moderate sedation in pediatric patients is oral midazolam, as it presents an alternative to less well-accepted routes of administration (eg, intravenous or intranasal) of this well-known efficacious and well-tolerated short-acting benzodiazepine. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to identify clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric patients in the context of premedication before anesthesia or during diagnostic/treatment procedures. The percentage of responders (response rate) after single administration of oral midazolam was evaluated and compared versus placebo in a subset of placebo-controlled studies. The range of oral midazolam doses providing effective sedation in the different pediatric age subsets was analyzed in order to assess optimum dosing strategies. A total of 25 pediatric clinical studies, utilizing a variety of measures of sedation effectiveness, were selected. These studies included a total of 1472 patients (aged 4 months-18 years) treated with midazolam (0.25-1.5 mg/kg) and 138 patients treated with placebo. The response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranged from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%], while with placebo response rates ranged from 4.0% [0.6%, 23.5%] to 41.0% [29.4%, 53.6%]. When considering the 4 placebo-controlled studies, the odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for the comparison of midazolam vs. placebo ranged from 13.4 [5.0, 36.0] to 25.9 [6.7, 100.6]. The analysis of subgroups by context of sedation showed response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranging from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.0% [94.8%, 98.3%] for anesthetic premedication and from 56.1% [43.1%, 68.4] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%] for medical procedures. The efficacy of midazolam for pediatric minimal/moderate sedation from a dose of 0.25 mg/kg and above was demonstrated. The probability of occurrence of adverse events and over-sedation increases with increasing doses.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1106
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Buccal Versus Intranasal Midazolam Sedation for Pediatric Dental Patients
    Sunbul, Nada
    Delvi, Mohamed Bilal
    Al Zahrani, Tariq
    Salama, Fouad
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 36 (07) : 483 - 488
  • [32] Predictors of pediatric sedation failure with initial dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
    Cui, Yu
    Gong, Tianqing
    Mu, Qixia
    Wu, Qunying
    Kang, Lu
    Chen, Qin
    He, Yani
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2023, 94 (06) : 2054 - 2061
  • [33] The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
    Xiaqing Zhou
    Jialian Zhao
    Haiya Tu
    Kunwei Chen
    Yaoqin Hu
    Yue Jin
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2024, 183 : 169 - 177
  • [34] Minimal Sedation Second Dose Strategy With Intranasal Midazolam in an Outpatient Pediatric Echocardiographic Setting
    Lazol, Judith P.
    DeGroff, Curt G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2009, 22 (04) : 383 - 387
  • [35] The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
    Zhou, Xiaqing
    Zhao, Jialian
    Tu, Haiya
    Chen, Kunwei
    Hu, Yaoqin
    Jin, Yue
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 183 (01) : 169 - 177
  • [36] Predictors of pediatric sedation failure with initial dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
    Yu Cui
    Tianqing Gong
    Qixia Mu
    Qunying Wu
    Lu Kang
    Qin Chen
    Yani He
    Pediatric Research, 2023, 94 : 2054 - 2061
  • [37] Pharmacokinetics of oral midazolam in pediatric patients.
    Akbari, B
    Khoo, KC
    Barsanti, F
    Pou, S
    Piscitelli, D
    Gillespie, WR
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 63 (02) : 195 - 195
  • [38] THE STRUGGLE FOR OPTIMAL SEDATION IN PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Vet, N. J.
    Ista, E.
    de Wildt, S. N.
    van Dijk, M.
    Tibboel, D.
    de Hoog, M.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 93 : S121 - S121
  • [39] The Efficacy and Safety of Oral Pentobarbital Sedation in Pediatric Echocardiography
    Warden, Charles N.
    Bernard, Pamela K.
    Kimball, Thomas R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2010, 23 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [40] Efficacy of intranasal sedation for pediatric dental procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Swaminathan, Kavitha
    Shan, Sushmita
    Sri, S. S. Monika
    Renugalakshmi, Apathsakayan
    Ravi, Ramanathan
    Haridoss, Selvakumar
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2025, 25 (01) : 1 - 13