Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review

被引:46
|
作者
Manso, Maria A. [1 ]
Guittet, Catherine [1 ]
Vandenhende, Francois [2 ]
Granier, Luc-Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Advicenne, Clin Affairs, 2 Rue Briconnet, F-30000 Nimes, France
[2] ClinBay, Stat, Genappe, Belgium
关键词
benzodiazepines; clinical efficacy; hypnotics and sedatives; pediatrics; preanesthetic medication; randomized trials; LOW-DOSE COMBINATION; PREOPERATIVE ANXIETY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; NITROUS-OXIDE; PREMEDICATION; KETAMINE; TRIAL; RELIABILITY; INTRANASAL; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.13747
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
One of the most widely used options for minimal/moderate sedation in pediatric patients is oral midazolam, as it presents an alternative to less well-accepted routes of administration (eg, intravenous or intranasal) of this well-known efficacious and well-tolerated short-acting benzodiazepine. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to identify clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric patients in the context of premedication before anesthesia or during diagnostic/treatment procedures. The percentage of responders (response rate) after single administration of oral midazolam was evaluated and compared versus placebo in a subset of placebo-controlled studies. The range of oral midazolam doses providing effective sedation in the different pediatric age subsets was analyzed in order to assess optimum dosing strategies. A total of 25 pediatric clinical studies, utilizing a variety of measures of sedation effectiveness, were selected. These studies included a total of 1472 patients (aged 4 months-18 years) treated with midazolam (0.25-1.5 mg/kg) and 138 patients treated with placebo. The response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranged from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%], while with placebo response rates ranged from 4.0% [0.6%, 23.5%] to 41.0% [29.4%, 53.6%]. When considering the 4 placebo-controlled studies, the odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for the comparison of midazolam vs. placebo ranged from 13.4 [5.0, 36.0] to 25.9 [6.7, 100.6]. The analysis of subgroups by context of sedation showed response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranging from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.0% [94.8%, 98.3%] for anesthetic premedication and from 56.1% [43.1%, 68.4] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%] for medical procedures. The efficacy of midazolam for pediatric minimal/moderate sedation from a dose of 0.25 mg/kg and above was demonstrated. The probability of occurrence of adverse events and over-sedation increases with increasing doses.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1106
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal sedation in pediatric intensive care patients: a systematic review
    Vet, Nienke J.
    Ista, Erwin
    de Wildt, Saskia N.
    van Dijk, Monique
    Tibboel, Dick
    de Hoog, Matthijs
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 (09) : 1524 - 1534
  • [22] Efficacy and Safety of Midazolam for Sedation in Pediatric Dentistry: A Controlled Clinical Trial
    Azevedo, Isabelita Duarte
    Fernandes Ferreira, Maria Angela
    Serejo da Costa, Anna Paula
    Bosco, Vera Lucia
    Moritz, Rachel Duarte
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 2013, 80 (03): : 133 - 138
  • [23] Optimal sedation in pediatric intensive care patients: a systematic review
    Nienke J. Vet
    Erwin Ista
    Saskia N. de Wildt
    Monique van Dijk
    Dick Tibboel
    Matthijs de Hoog
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2013, 39 : 1524 - 1534
  • [24] Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Compared With Placebo and Midazolam for Moderate Sedation During Bronchoscopy
    Pastis, Nicholas J.
    Yarmus, Lonny B.
    Schippers, Frank
    Ostroff, Randall
    Chen, Alexander
    Akulian, Jason
    Wahidi, Momen
    Shojaee, Samira
    Tanner, Nichole T.
    Callahan, Sean P.
    Feldman, Gregory
    Lorch Jr, Daniel G.
    Ndukwu, Ikeadi
    Pritchett, Michael A.
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    CHEST, 2019, 155 (01) : 137 - 146
  • [25] Safety of oral midazolam sedation use in paediatric dentistry: a review
    Papineni, Arathi
    Lourenco-Matharu, Liege
    Ashley, Paul F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 24 (01) : 2 - 13
  • [26] Efficacy of α2-Agonists for Sedation in Pediatric Critical Care: A Systematic Review
    Hayden, John C.
    Breatnach, Cormac
    Doherty, Dermot R.
    Healy, Martina
    Howlett, Moninne M.
    Gallagher, Paul J.
    Cousins, Grainne
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (02) : E66 - E75
  • [27] Behavioral outcome of oral midazolam premedication in pediatric dental general anesthesia: A systematic review
    Hisham, Abdul Rauf Badrul
    Mohamad, Farah Najihah
    Ali, Iza Nabihah
    Ghani, Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul
    Ahmad, Wan Muhammad Amir Wan
    Samsudin, Norsamsu Arni
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 14 (06): : 531 - 542
  • [28] SEDATION WITH MEPERIDINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPY
    NAHATA, MC
    BAHAL, N
    LININGER, B
    FISHBEIN, M
    POTTER, C
    MURRAY, R
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1993, 53 (02) : 146 - 146
  • [29] EVALUATION OF MIDAZOLAM SEDATION OF MODERATELY UNCOOPERATIVE PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS
    WILSON, CFG
    ONEILL, WL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1990, 69 : 146 - 146
  • [30] SEDATION WITH MEPERIDINE AND MIDAZOLAM IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPY
    BAHALOMARA, N
    NAHATA, MC
    MURRAY, RD
    LINSCHEID, TR
    FISHBEIN, M
    HEITLINGER, LA
    LI, BUK
    MCCLUNG, HJ
    POTTER, C
    LININGER, B
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 47 (04) : 319 - 323