Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review

被引:46
|
作者
Manso, Maria A. [1 ]
Guittet, Catherine [1 ]
Vandenhende, Francois [2 ]
Granier, Luc-Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Advicenne, Clin Affairs, 2 Rue Briconnet, F-30000 Nimes, France
[2] ClinBay, Stat, Genappe, Belgium
关键词
benzodiazepines; clinical efficacy; hypnotics and sedatives; pediatrics; preanesthetic medication; randomized trials; LOW-DOSE COMBINATION; PREOPERATIVE ANXIETY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; NITROUS-OXIDE; PREMEDICATION; KETAMINE; TRIAL; RELIABILITY; INTRANASAL; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.13747
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
One of the most widely used options for minimal/moderate sedation in pediatric patients is oral midazolam, as it presents an alternative to less well-accepted routes of administration (eg, intravenous or intranasal) of this well-known efficacious and well-tolerated short-acting benzodiazepine. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to identify clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric patients in the context of premedication before anesthesia or during diagnostic/treatment procedures. The percentage of responders (response rate) after single administration of oral midazolam was evaluated and compared versus placebo in a subset of placebo-controlled studies. The range of oral midazolam doses providing effective sedation in the different pediatric age subsets was analyzed in order to assess optimum dosing strategies. A total of 25 pediatric clinical studies, utilizing a variety of measures of sedation effectiveness, were selected. These studies included a total of 1472 patients (aged 4 months-18 years) treated with midazolam (0.25-1.5 mg/kg) and 138 patients treated with placebo. The response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranged from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%], while with placebo response rates ranged from 4.0% [0.6%, 23.5%] to 41.0% [29.4%, 53.6%]. When considering the 4 placebo-controlled studies, the odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for the comparison of midazolam vs. placebo ranged from 13.4 [5.0, 36.0] to 25.9 [6.7, 100.6]. The analysis of subgroups by context of sedation showed response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranging from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.0% [94.8%, 98.3%] for anesthetic premedication and from 56.1% [43.1%, 68.4] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%] for medical procedures. The efficacy of midazolam for pediatric minimal/moderate sedation from a dose of 0.25 mg/kg and above was demonstrated. The probability of occurrence of adverse events and over-sedation increases with increasing doses.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1106
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF AN INNOVATIVE ORAL FORMULATION OF MIDAZOLAM FOR MODERATE SEDATION IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS
    Guittet, C.
    Manso, M.
    Casagrande, L.
    Raffour, C.
    Dekens, J.
    Jezraoui, P.
    Legrand, A.
    Granier, L.
    Dupont, H.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 313 - 314
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of Oral Midazolam Sedation Compared with its Combination with Hydroxyzine Use in Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review
    Oliveira, Gustavo Henrique Porto
    Brandao, Diogo Gomes
    de Lima, Fernando Jose Camello
    do Nascimento, Patricia Batista Lopes
    de Marcelos, Priscylla Gonsalves Correia Leite
    Pugliesi, Daniela Maria Carvalho
    Cosme-Silva, Leopoldo
    dos Santos Junior, Valdeci Elias
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2023, 23
  • [4] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine compared with midazolam for sedation in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review
    Adams, R.
    Brown, G. T.
    Davidson, M.
    Fisher, E.
    Mathisen, J.
    Thomson, G.
    Webster, N. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 111 (05) : 703 - 710
  • [5] Evaluation of oral or rectal midazolam as conscious sedation for pediatric patients in oral surgery
    Okcu, KM
    Guner, Y
    Aydintug, YS
    Gunaydin, Y
    Sencimen, M
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2004, 169 (04) : 270 - 273
  • [6] Comparison of oral midazolam with and without hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients
    Shapira, J
    Kupietzky, A
    Kadari, A
    Fuks, AB
    Holan, G
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 26 (06) : 492 - 496
  • [7] Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [8] AN EVALUATION OF ORAL AND NASAL MIDAZOLAM FOR PEDIATRIC DENTAL SEDATION
    HARTGRAVES, PM
    PRIMOSCH, RE
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1994, 61 (03): : 175 - 181
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Midazolam for Seizure Emergencies in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Seinfeld, S.
    Pellock, J. M.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2013, 74 : S158 - S158
  • [10] Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam in Procedural Sedation. A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety
    Barends, Clemens R. M.
    Absalom, Anthony
    van Minnen, Baucke
    Vissink, Arjan
    Visser, Anita
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):