Polypharmacy in the Aging Patient A Review of Glycemic Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

被引:177
|
作者
Lipska, Kasia J. [1 ]
Krumholz, Harlan [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Soones, Tacara [6 ]
Lee, Sei J. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Endocrinol Sect, 333 Cedar St,POB 208020, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale New Haven Hosp, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Fdn, Clin Scholars Program, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Geriatr & Palliat Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
关键词
INTENSIVE GLUCOSE CONTROL; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS; CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; HEMOGLOBIN A(1C); YOUNGER ADULTS;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2016.0299
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE There is substantial uncertainty about optimal glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBSERVATIONS Four large randomized clinical trials (RCTs), ranging in size from 1791 to 11 440 patients, provide the majority of the evidence used to guide diabetes therapy. Most RCTs of intensive vs standard glycemic control excluded adults older than 80 years, used surrogate end points to evaluate microvascular outcomes and provided limited data on which subgroups are most likely to benefit or be harmed by specific therapies. Available data from randomized clinical trials suggest that intensive glycemic control does not reduce major macrovascular events in older adults for at least 10 years. Furthermore, intensive glycemic control does not lead to improved patient-centered microvascular outcomes for at least 8 years. Data from randomized clinical trials consistently suggest that intensive glycemic control immediately increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia 1.5-to 3-fold. Based on these data and observational studies, for the majority of adults older than 65 years, the harms associated with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target lower than 7.5% or higher than 9% are likely to outweigh the benefits. However, the optimal target depends on patient factors, medications used to reach the target, life expectancy, and patient preferences about treatment. If only medications with low treatment burden and hypoglycemia risk (such as metformin) are required, a lower HbA1c targetmay be appropriate. If patients strongly prefer to avoid injections or frequent fingerstick monitoring, a higher HbA1c target that obviates the need for insulin may be appropriate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE High-quality evidence about glycemic treatment in older adults is lacking. Optimal decisions need to be made collaboratively with patients, incorporating the likelihood of benefits and harms and patient preferences about treatment and treatment burden. For the majority of older adults, an HbA1c target between 7.5% and 9% will maximize benefits and minimize harms.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1045
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diabetes self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of the effect on glycemic control
    Chrvala, Carole A.
    Sherr, Dawn
    Lipman, Ruth D.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (06) : 926 - 943
  • [42] Diabetes education for Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control
    Choi, Tammie S. T.
    Davidson, Zoe E.
    Walker, Karen Z.
    Lee, Jia Hwa
    Palermo, Claire
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 116 : 218 - 229
  • [43] Deprescribing, Polypharmacy and Prescribing Cascades in Older People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Focused Review
    Elizabeth Hickman
    Clare Gillies
    Kamlesh Khunti
    Samuel Seidu
    Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 2023, 103 : 191 - 204
  • [44] Glycemic Control and Bone Turnover in Older Mexican Americans with Type 2 Diabetes
    Rianon, Nahid J.
    Smith, Scott M.
    Lee, MinJae
    Pervin, Hannah
    Musgrave, Paul
    Watt, Gordon P.
    Nader, Shahla
    Khosla, Sundeep
    Ambrose, Catherine G.
    McCormick, Joseph B.
    Fisher-Hoch, Susan P.
    JOURNAL OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2018, 2018
  • [45] Glycemic control, inflammation, and cognitive function in older patients with type 2 diabetes
    Akrivos, Jimmy
    Ravona-Springer, Ramit
    Schmeidler, James
    LeRoith, Derek
    Heymann, Anthony
    Preiss, Rachel
    Hoffman, Hadas
    Koifman, Keren
    Silverman, Jeremy M.
    Beeri, Michal Schnaider
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 30 (10) : 1093 - 1100
  • [46] Patient-Centered Care, Glycemic Control, Diabetes Self-Care, and Quality of Life in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes
    Williams, Joni S.
    Walker, Rebekah J.
    Smalls, Brittany L.
    Hill, Rachel
    Egede, Leonard E.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 18 (10) : 644 - 649
  • [47] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EFFECT OF CINNAMON ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN TYPE 2 DIABETES
    Boonkaew, Sukamai
    Suksomboon, Naeti
    Poolsup, Nalinee
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 38 (01) : 164 - 165
  • [48] Glycemic Control for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Systematic Review
    Bin Rakhis, Saud A., Sr.
    AlDuwayhis, Nawaf Mohammed
    Aleid, Naif
    AlBarrak, Abdullah Nasser
    Aloraini, Abdullah Ahmed
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [49] Glycemic Management in a Patient with Type 2 Diabetes
    Hirsch, Irl B.
    Molitch, Mark E.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (14): : 1370 - 1372