Polypharmacy in the Aging Patient A Review of Glycemic Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

被引:177
|
作者
Lipska, Kasia J. [1 ]
Krumholz, Harlan [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Soones, Tacara [6 ]
Lee, Sei J. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Endocrinol Sect, 333 Cedar St,POB 208020, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale New Haven Hosp, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Fdn, Clin Scholars Program, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Geriatr & Palliat Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
关键词
INTENSIVE GLUCOSE CONTROL; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS; CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; HEMOGLOBIN A(1C); YOUNGER ADULTS;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2016.0299
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE There is substantial uncertainty about optimal glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBSERVATIONS Four large randomized clinical trials (RCTs), ranging in size from 1791 to 11 440 patients, provide the majority of the evidence used to guide diabetes therapy. Most RCTs of intensive vs standard glycemic control excluded adults older than 80 years, used surrogate end points to evaluate microvascular outcomes and provided limited data on which subgroups are most likely to benefit or be harmed by specific therapies. Available data from randomized clinical trials suggest that intensive glycemic control does not reduce major macrovascular events in older adults for at least 10 years. Furthermore, intensive glycemic control does not lead to improved patient-centered microvascular outcomes for at least 8 years. Data from randomized clinical trials consistently suggest that intensive glycemic control immediately increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia 1.5-to 3-fold. Based on these data and observational studies, for the majority of adults older than 65 years, the harms associated with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target lower than 7.5% or higher than 9% are likely to outweigh the benefits. However, the optimal target depends on patient factors, medications used to reach the target, life expectancy, and patient preferences about treatment. If only medications with low treatment burden and hypoglycemia risk (such as metformin) are required, a lower HbA1c targetmay be appropriate. If patients strongly prefer to avoid injections or frequent fingerstick monitoring, a higher HbA1c target that obviates the need for insulin may be appropriate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE High-quality evidence about glycemic treatment in older adults is lacking. Optimal decisions need to be made collaboratively with patients, incorporating the likelihood of benefits and harms and patient preferences about treatment and treatment burden. For the majority of older adults, an HbA1c target between 7.5% and 9% will maximize benefits and minimize harms.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1045
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Depression in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Is there any Relationship With Glycemic Control, Gender and Habits?
    Gonzalez, Eva Lopez
    Garcia, Alicia B.
    Luongo, Angela
    Milrad, Silvana
    Morosini, Maria L. Ruiz
    Varela, Maria C.
    Khoury, Marina
    Decoydi
    DIABETES, 2012, 61 : A212 - A212
  • [23] Depression in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Is there any Relationship With Glycemic Control, Gender and Habits?
    Lopez Gonzalez, Eva
    Garcia, Alicia B.
    Luongo, Angela
    Milrad, Silvana
    Ruiz Morosini, Maria L.
    Varela, Maria C.
    Khoury, Marina
    Decoydi
    DIABETES, 2012, 61 : A212 - A212
  • [24] Glycaemic control in older people with type 2 diabetes: an opportunity to reduce polypharmacy
    Bruce, D.
    Feher, E.
    Davis, W.
    Davis, T.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2017, 36 : 22 - 22
  • [25] Dietary glycemic index and load and risk of type 2 diabetes in older adults
    Anderson, Amy Louise
    Sahyoun, Nadine R.
    Harris, Tamara B.
    Tylavsky, Frances A.
    Goodpaster, Bret H.
    Lee, Jung Sun
    Sellmeyer, Deborah E.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2007, 21 (05): : A116 - A116
  • [26] Patient Preference and Satisfaction with the Use of Telemedicine for Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Review
    Sim, Ruth
    Lee, Shaun Wen Huey
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2021, 15 : 283 - 298
  • [27] Glycemic control and cardiovascular disease in Type 2 diabetes: a review
    Wild, SH
    Dunn, CJ
    McKeigue, PM
    Comte, S
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 1999, 15 (03) : 197 - 204
  • [28] Racial and ethnic differences in glycemic control of adults with type 2 diabetes
    Harris, MI
    Eastman, RC
    Cowie, CC
    Flegal, KM
    Eberhardt, MS
    DIABETES CARE, 1999, 22 (03) : 403 - 408
  • [29] Sleep quality and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Borzouei, Shiva
    Ahmadi, Asma
    Pirdehghan, Azar
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 13 (08) : 3398 - 3402
  • [30] Acculturation and Glycemic Control of Asian Indian Adults with Type 2 Diabetes
    Venkatesh, Sumathi
    Weatherspoon, Lorraine J.
    Kaplowitz, Stan A.
    Song, Won O.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2013, 38 (01) : 78 - 85