Polypharmacy in the Aging Patient A Review of Glycemic Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

被引:177
|
作者
Lipska, Kasia J. [1 ]
Krumholz, Harlan [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Soones, Tacara [6 ]
Lee, Sei J. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Endocrinol Sect, 333 Cedar St,POB 208020, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale New Haven Hosp, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Fdn, Clin Scholars Program, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Geriatr & Palliat Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
关键词
INTENSIVE GLUCOSE CONTROL; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS; CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; HEMOGLOBIN A(1C); YOUNGER ADULTS;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2016.0299
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE There is substantial uncertainty about optimal glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBSERVATIONS Four large randomized clinical trials (RCTs), ranging in size from 1791 to 11 440 patients, provide the majority of the evidence used to guide diabetes therapy. Most RCTs of intensive vs standard glycemic control excluded adults older than 80 years, used surrogate end points to evaluate microvascular outcomes and provided limited data on which subgroups are most likely to benefit or be harmed by specific therapies. Available data from randomized clinical trials suggest that intensive glycemic control does not reduce major macrovascular events in older adults for at least 10 years. Furthermore, intensive glycemic control does not lead to improved patient-centered microvascular outcomes for at least 8 years. Data from randomized clinical trials consistently suggest that intensive glycemic control immediately increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia 1.5-to 3-fold. Based on these data and observational studies, for the majority of adults older than 65 years, the harms associated with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target lower than 7.5% or higher than 9% are likely to outweigh the benefits. However, the optimal target depends on patient factors, medications used to reach the target, life expectancy, and patient preferences about treatment. If only medications with low treatment burden and hypoglycemia risk (such as metformin) are required, a lower HbA1c targetmay be appropriate. If patients strongly prefer to avoid injections or frequent fingerstick monitoring, a higher HbA1c target that obviates the need for insulin may be appropriate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE High-quality evidence about glycemic treatment in older adults is lacking. Optimal decisions need to be made collaboratively with patients, incorporating the likelihood of benefits and harms and patient preferences about treatment and treatment burden. For the majority of older adults, an HbA1c target between 7.5% and 9% will maximize benefits and minimize harms.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1045
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Factors Predicting Glycemic Control in Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
    Chiu, Ching-Ju
    Wray, Linda A.
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2010, 7 (01):
  • [12] Gender and ethnic disparities in glycemic control among rural older adults with type 2 diabetes
    Bell, R
    Quandt, S
    Arcury, T
    Mellen, B
    Smith, S
    Skelly, A
    Wetmore, L
    DIABETES, 2003, 52 : A495 - A495
  • [13] Association between Sarcopenia and Poor Glycemic Control in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Alfaro-Alvarado, Fabian Alonso
    Rosas-Barrientos, Jose Vicente
    Ocharan-Hernandez, Maria Esther
    Diaz-Chiguer, Dylan
    Vargas-De-Leon, Cruz
    DISEASES, 2023, 11 (04)
  • [14] Diabetes Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and ADHD
    Leshno, Dahlia
    Shalem, Liat Lev
    Gavze, Revital Perlove
    Leshno, Moshe
    JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2025, 29 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [15] Brief Commentary: Glycemic Targets for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
    Schroeder, Emily B.
    Karter, Andrew J.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 169 (04) : 250 - +
  • [16] Dietary diabete glycemic index and glycemic load and the risk of type 2 diabetes in older adults
    Sahyoun, Nadine R.
    Anderson, Amy L.
    Tylavsky, Frances A.
    Lee, Jung Sun
    Sellmeyer, Deborah E.
    Harris, Tamara B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2008, 87 (01): : 126 - 131
  • [17] Chronic Comorbidities and Glycemic Control in Older Adults with Diabetes
    Lee, Christine
    Nichols, Gregory
    DIABETES, 2014, 63 : A344 - A344
  • [18] Comparative Effectiveness for Glycemic Control in Older Adults with Diabetes
    Quartuccio M.
    Buta B.
    Kalyani R.R.
    Current Geriatrics Reports, 2017, 6 (3) : 175 - 186
  • [19] Inpatient Glycemic Control and Glucose Variability by Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes
    Idrees, Thaer
    Galindo, Rodolfo J.
    Urrutia, Maria A.
    Castro-Revoredo, Iris A.
    Moreno, Emmelin Marie
    Migdal, Alexandra L.
    Davis, Georgia M.
    Vellanki, Priyathama
    Fayfman, Maya
    Pasquel, Francisco J.
    Peng, Limin
    Umpierrez, Guillermo E.
    DIABETES, 2022, 71
  • [20] Frailty, glycemic control, and patterns of healthcare utilization among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Callahan, K.
    Lenoir, K. M.
    Usoh, C.
    Moses, A.
    Hinely, M. T.
    Sherod-Harris, T.
    Pajewski, N. M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 70 : S12 - S12