Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy - a multi-institution study

被引:1
|
作者
Kashani, R.
Baiter, J.
Kessler, M.
Hub, M.
Dong, L.
Zhang, L.
Xing, L.
Xie, Y.
Hawkes, D.
Schnabel, J.
McClelland, J.
Joshi, S.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Deutsch Krebsforschungszentrum, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[5] UCL, London, England
[6] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2761334
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The looming potential of deformable alignment tools to play an integral role in adaptive radiotherapy suggests a need for objective assessment of these complex algorithms. Current studies of accuracy require analytically generated deformations applied to sample image data, or use of contours or bifurcations, with inherent uncertainty as well as potential bias, as these visible features are likely to dominate the local deformation parameters. Method and Materials: A deformable phantom was embedded with 48 small radiopaque markers, placed in regions varying from high contrast to roughly uniform regional intensity, and small to large regional discontinuities in movement. CT volumes of this phantom were acquired in two different deformation states. After manual localization of marker coordinates, images were edited to remove the markers. The resulting image volumes were sent to 4 collaborating institutions, each of which has developed previously published deformable alignment tools routinely in use. Alignments were done, and applied to the list of reference coordinates. The transformed coordinates were compared to the actual marker locations. Results: 5 alignment techniques were tested from the 4 institutions. All algorithms performed generally well, as compared to previous publications. Average errors in predicted location ranged from 1.7–3.9 mm, depending on technique. No algorithm was uniformly accurate across all regions of the phantom, with maximum errors ranging from 5.5 – 15.4 mm. Larger errors were seen in regions near significant shape changes, as well as areas with uniform contrast but large local motion discontinuity. Conclusion: An objective test of deformable alignment is feasible. Reasonable accuracy was achieved, although variable errors in different regions suggest caution in globally accepting the results from deformable alignment. Valuable feedback from investigators is being applied to development of further generations of deformable phantoms for alignment experiments. Sponsored by NIH P01‐CA59827. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2545 / 2545
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: A multi-institution study
    Kashani, Rojano
    Hub, Martina
    Balter, James M.
    Kessler, Marc L.
    Dong, Lei
    Zhang, Lifei
    Xing, Lei
    Xie, Yaoqin
    Hawkes, David
    Schnabel, Julia A.
    McClelland, Jamie
    Joshi, Sarang
    Chen, Quan
    Lu, Weiguo
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) : 5944 - 5953
  • [2] A multi-institution deformable registration accuracy study
    Brock, K. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S44 - S44
  • [3] RESULTS OF A MULTI-INSTITUTION DEFORMABLE REGISTRATION ACCURACY STUDY (MIDRAS)
    Brock, Kristy K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (02): : 583 - 596
  • [4] A multi-institution evaluation of deformable image registration algorithms for automatic organ delineation in adaptive head and neck radiotherapy
    Hardcastle, Nicholas
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    Cannon, Donald M.
    Brouwer, Charlotte L.
    Wittendorp, Paul W. H.
    Dogan, Nesrin
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Allaire, Stephane
    Mallya, Yogish
    Kumar, Prashant
    Oechsner, Markus
    Richter, Anne
    Song, Shiyu
    Myers, Michael
    Polat, Buelent
    Bzdusek, Karl
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7
  • [5] A multi-institution evaluation of deformable image registration algorithms for automatic organ delineation in adaptive head and neck radiotherapy
    Nicholas Hardcastle
    Wolfgang A Tomé
    Donald M Cannon
    Charlotte L Brouwer
    Paul WH Wittendorp
    Nesrin Dogan
    Matthias Guckenberger
    Stéphane Allaire
    Yogish Mallya
    Prashant Kumar
    Markus Oechsner
    Anne Richter
    Shiyu Song
    Michael Myers
    Bülent Polat
    Karl Bzdusek
    Radiation Oncology, 7
  • [6] Variability in commercially available deformable image registration: A multi-institution analysis using virtual head and neck phantoms
    Kubli, Alex
    Pukala, Jason
    Shah, Amish P.
    Kelly, Patrick
    Langen, Katja M.
    Bova, Frank J.
    Manon, Rafael R.
    Meeks, Sanford L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (05): : 89 - 96
  • [7] Results From a Multi Institution Study On Image Quality Impact in Deformable Image Registration
    Loi, G.
    Fusella, M.
    Lanzi, E.
    Fiandra, C.
    Orlani, G.
    Lucio, F.
    Strolin, S.
    Gino, E.
    Mezzenga, E.
    Roggio, A.
    Cagni, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3778 - 3778
  • [8] Objective Assessment of the Quality and Accuracy of Deformable Image Registration
    Jurkovic, Ines-Ana
    Papanikolaou, Nikos
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Kirby, Neil
    Mavroidis, Panayiotis
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 45 (03) : 156 - 167
  • [9] Multi-objective optimization for deformable image registration: proof of concept
    Alderliesten, Tanja
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    Bosman, Peter A. N.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 8314
  • [10] SALG and POGIL: A multi-institution assessment
    Bressette, Andrew R.
    Simons, Emily
    Straumanis, Andrei
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 231