Using your nose to find your way: Ethological comparisons between human and non-human species

被引:8
|
作者
Raithel, Clara U. [1 ,2 ]
Gottfried, Jay A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Neurol, 3400 Hamilton Walk,Stemmler Hall,Room G10, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Arts & Sci, Dept Psychol, 425 S Univ Ave,Stephen A Levin Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
关键词
Olfaction; Odor; Stimulus-response learning; Spatial navigation; Cognitive maps; OLFACTORY NAVIGATION; PATH-INTEGRATION; COGNITIVE MAP; NEURAL BASIS; SPATIAL MAP; ODOR; MECHANISMS; PLACE; BEHAVIOR; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.040
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Olfaction is arguably the least valued among our sensory systems, and its significance for human behavior is often neglected. Spatial navigation represents no exception to the rule: humans are often characterized as purely visual navigators, a view that undermines the contribution of olfactory cues. Accordingly, research investigating whether and how humans use olfaction to navigate space is rare. In comparison, research on olfactory navigation in non-human species is abundant, and identifies behavioral strategies along with neural mechanisms characterizing the use of olfactory cues during spatial tasks. Using an ethological approach, our review draws from studies on olfactory navigation across species to describe the adaptation of strategies under the influence of selective pressure. Mammals interact with spatial environments by abstracting multisensory information into cognitive maps. We thus argue that olfactory cues, alongside inputs from other sensory modalities, play a crucial role in spatial navigation for mammalian species, including humans; that is, odors constitute one of the many building blocks in the formation of cognitive maps.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 779
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Educational Significance of Human and Non-Human Animal Interactions: Blurring the Species Line
    Affifi, Ramsey
    EDUCATIONAL THEORY, 2018, 68 (02) : 243 - 250
  • [42] Resolving discontinuity: A minimalist distinction between human and non-human minds
    Bickerton, D
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 2000, 40 (06): : 862 - 873
  • [43] Abusive relationships between human and non-human animals and their importance for psychologists
    Gullone, E.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 53 : 154 - 154
  • [44] Conservation of minor histocompatibility antigens between human and non-human primates
    denHaan, JMM
    Bontrop, RE
    Pool, J
    Sherman, N
    Blokland, E
    Engelhard, VH
    Hunt, DF
    Goulmy, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 26 (11) : 2680 - 2685
  • [46] Data Transfer through Human Body New Way to transfer your Data
    Solanki, Charmi
    Varsha, Hindupur
    Gaikwad, Vaishali
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS AND APPLICATIONS (IOTA), 2016, : 332 - 336
  • [47] Sequence comparisons of non-human primate HIV-1 coreceptor homologues
    Benton, PA
    Lee, DR
    Kennedy, RC
    MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 35 (02) : 95 - 101
  • [48] COMPARISONS OF STRUCTURAL PATTERNS OF MUSCLES OF PROGRESSION IN MAN AND SOME NON-HUMAN PRIMATES
    TAPPEN, NC
    ANATOMICAL RECORD, 1958, 130 (02): : 381 - 382
  • [49] Non-human influencers on Instagram: between postfeminism and transhumanism
    Barboza, Romina Andrea
    APOSTA-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2025, 104 : 113 - 126
  • [50] Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species
    Marshall-Pescini, S.
    Dale, R.
    Quervel-Chaumette, M.
    Range, F.
    ANIMAL COGNITION, 2016, 19 (04) : 679 - 705