Using your nose to find your way: Ethological comparisons between human and non-human species

被引:8
|
作者
Raithel, Clara U. [1 ,2 ]
Gottfried, Jay A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Neurol, 3400 Hamilton Walk,Stemmler Hall,Room G10, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Arts & Sci, Dept Psychol, 425 S Univ Ave,Stephen A Levin Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
关键词
Olfaction; Odor; Stimulus-response learning; Spatial navigation; Cognitive maps; OLFACTORY NAVIGATION; PATH-INTEGRATION; COGNITIVE MAP; NEURAL BASIS; SPATIAL MAP; ODOR; MECHANISMS; PLACE; BEHAVIOR; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.040
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Olfaction is arguably the least valued among our sensory systems, and its significance for human behavior is often neglected. Spatial navigation represents no exception to the rule: humans are often characterized as purely visual navigators, a view that undermines the contribution of olfactory cues. Accordingly, research investigating whether and how humans use olfaction to navigate space is rare. In comparison, research on olfactory navigation in non-human species is abundant, and identifies behavioral strategies along with neural mechanisms characterizing the use of olfactory cues during spatial tasks. Using an ethological approach, our review draws from studies on olfactory navigation across species to describe the adaptation of strategies under the influence of selective pressure. Mammals interact with spatial environments by abstracting multisensory information into cognitive maps. We thus argue that olfactory cues, alongside inputs from other sensory modalities, play a crucial role in spatial navigation for mammalian species, including humans; that is, odors constitute one of the many building blocks in the formation of cognitive maps.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 779
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The protective properties of milk and colostrum in non-human species
    Tizard, I
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITIONAL RESEARCH, VOL 10: IMMUNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MILK, 2001, 10 : 139 - 166
  • [32] Genetic engineering and the moral status of non-human species
    Melin, A
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2004, 17 (06): : 479 - 495
  • [33] Genetic engineering and the Moral Status of Non-Human Species
    Anders Melin
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2004, 17 : 479 - 495
  • [34] CHARACTERIZATION OF ALOPECIA IN FOUR SPECIES OF NON-HUMAN PRIMATES
    Jacobsen, K. R.
    Hopper, L. M.
    McAdams, T.
    Merino, R.
    Sherenco, K.
    Lambeth, S. P.
    Schapiro, S. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2011, 73 : 81 - 81
  • [36] Always follow your nose: The functional significance of social chemosignals in human reproduction and survival
    Luebke, Katrin T.
    Pause, Bettina M.
    HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 68 : 134 - 144
  • [37] Affinities between Asian non-human Schistosoma species, the S-indicum group, and the African human schistosomes
    Agatsuma, T
    Iwagami, M
    Liu, CX
    Rajapakse, RPVJ
    Mondal, MMH
    Kitikoon, V
    Ambu, S
    Agatsuma, Y
    Blair, D
    Higuchi, T
    JOURNAL OF HELMINTHOLOGY, 2002, 76 (01) : 7 - 19
  • [38] The effects of affect. A plea for distance between the human and non-human
    De Block, Greet
    Vicenzotti, Vera
    JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, 2018, 13 (02) : 46 - 55
  • [39] COMPARISON OF PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN NON-HUMAN PRIMATES AND HUMAN PATIENTS
    Baratz, Ethan
    McCully, Cynthia
    Shih, Joanna
    Warren, Katherine
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 : 157 - 157
  • [40] Of Fur, Feather, and Fin: Human's Use and Concern for Non-Human Species
    Byrd, Elizabeth
    Widmar, Nicole Olynk
    Fulton, Joan
    ANIMALS, 2017, 7 (03):