Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine versus detemir analysis in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Silva, Thales B. C. [2 ,3 ]
Almeida, Paulo H. R. F. [2 ,3 ]
Araujo, Vania E. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Acurcio, Francisco de Assis [2 ,3 ]
Guerra Junior, Augusto A. [2 ,3 ]
Godman, Brian [1 ]
Alvares, Juliana [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Strathclyde Inst Pharm & Biomed Sci, Glasgow G4 0RE, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Fed Univ Minas Gerais UFMG, Sch Pharm, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Minas Gerais UFMG, SUS Collaborating Ctr Technol Assessment & Excell, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[4] PUCMG, Sch Dent, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
comparative effectiveness; detemir; diabetes mellitus type 1; glargine; systematic review; BASAL-BOLUS REGIMENS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; NPH INSULIN; OPEN-LABEL; FOLLOW-UP; MELLITUS; CHILDREN; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1177/2042018818781414
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) is an autoimmune disease characterized by metabolic destruction of pancreatic cells responsible for insulin production, with treatment based on replacing insulin. Long-acting insulin analogs are indicated for patients with DM1 who exhibit important oscillations of their daily glycemia, despite its higher cost. Our study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two long-acting insulins, insulin glargine and detemir, in treating patients with DM1. Methods: We undertook a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies (cohort and registry) available in the databases and the gray literature, and a complementary search in the Diabetes Care journal. Outcomes assessed were: glycated hemoglobin concentration; fasting plasma or capillary glucose; occurrence of episodes of severe hypoglycemia and occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycemia. The assessment of methodological quality was performed using the Newcastle score. The meta-analyses were performed on software Review Manager (R) 5.2. Results: Out of 705 publications, 8 cohort studies were included. The quality of these studies was classified as high. In the meta-analysis, results regarding episodes of severe hypoglycemia (p = 0.02) and fasting glucose (p = 0.01) were in favor of detemir. The glycated hemoglobin (p = 0.49; I-2 = 89) showed high heterogeneity and no statistically significant difference between the two. The meta-analysis of total insulin dose favored glargine (p = 0.006; I-2 = 75). The rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia (NH) were evaluated only for one study and showed a significant reduction of NH after therapy with detemir, (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Although some outcomes were favorable to detemir insulin analog, it has not been possible to identify important differences of effectiveness and safety between the two analogs. These results can help in the current debate on the inclusion of long-acting analogs on the list of reimbursed medicines in Brazil, especially with the recent introduction of an insulin glargine biosimilar at a considerably lower price.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 254
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bao, Le-xin
    Shi, Wan-ting
    Han, Yu-xin
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (16): : 2741 - 2753
  • [42] Evaluating the efficacy and safety of weekly Insulin Icodec vs. Daily Insulin Glargine in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zuhair, Varisha
    Obaid, Muhammad Adil
    Mustafa, Muhammad Saqlain
    Shafique, Muhammad Ashir
    Rangwala, Burhanuddin Sohail
    Shakil, Areej
    Babar, Areesha
    Rangwala, Hussain Sohail
    Obaid, Muhammad Ishtiaq
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2024, 23 (01) : 1337 - 1349
  • [43] Insulin Glargine and Cancer Risk in Patients with Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis
    Tang, Xulei
    Yang, Lin
    He, Zhiyu
    Liu, Jingfang
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [44] Clinical efficacy and safety of insulin aspart compared with regular human insulin in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wojciechowski, Piotr
    Niemczyk-Szechowska, Patrycja
    Olewinska, Elzbieta
    Jaros, Patrycja
    Mierzejewska, Barbara
    Skarzynska-Duk, Joanna
    Malecki, Maciej T.
    Rys, Przemyslaw
    POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 125 (03): : 141 - 151
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of pramlintide injection adjunct to insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiao, Yong-Chao
    Ling, Wei
    Pan, Yan-Hong
    Chen, Yin-Ling
    Zhou, Dan
    Huang, Yan-Mei
    Zhang, Xiao-Xi
    Zhao, Hai-Lu
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (39) : 66504 - 66515
  • [46] CLINICAL AND COST OUTCOMES OF TREATMENT WITH INSULIN GLARGINE VERSUS INSULIN DETEMIR IN INSULIN NAIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS: COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS IN THE KAZAKHSTAN SETTING
    Kostyuk, A.
    Akanov, A.
    Almadiyeva, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A203 - A204
  • [47] Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL Versus Insulin Degludec for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in China
    Wen Su
    Chaoyun Li
    Lei Zhang
    Ziyi Lin
    Jun Tan
    Jianwei Xuan
    Diabetes Therapy, 2019, 10 : 1969 - 1984
  • [48] Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL Versus Insulin Degludec for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in China
    Su, Wen
    Li, Chaoyun
    Zhang, Lei
    Lin, Ziyi
    Tan, Jun
    Xuan, Jianwei
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2019, 10 (05) : 1969 - 1984
  • [49] Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dirnena-Fusini, Ilze
    Am, Marte Kierulf
    Fougner, Anders Lyngvi
    Carlsen, Sven Magnus
    Christiansen, Sverre Christian
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [50] Effects of Insulin Detemir Versus Insulin Glargine on Intake and Satiety Factors in Type 1 Diabetes
    Garimella, Madhavi
    Mitchell, Stephen
    Burge, Mark R.
    DIABETES, 2011, 60 : A687 - A687