Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine versus detemir analysis in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Silva, Thales B. C. [2 ,3 ]
Almeida, Paulo H. R. F. [2 ,3 ]
Araujo, Vania E. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Acurcio, Francisco de Assis [2 ,3 ]
Guerra Junior, Augusto A. [2 ,3 ]
Godman, Brian [1 ]
Alvares, Juliana [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Strathclyde Inst Pharm & Biomed Sci, Glasgow G4 0RE, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Fed Univ Minas Gerais UFMG, Sch Pharm, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Minas Gerais UFMG, SUS Collaborating Ctr Technol Assessment & Excell, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[4] PUCMG, Sch Dent, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
comparative effectiveness; detemir; diabetes mellitus type 1; glargine; systematic review; BASAL-BOLUS REGIMENS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; NPH INSULIN; OPEN-LABEL; FOLLOW-UP; MELLITUS; CHILDREN; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1177/2042018818781414
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) is an autoimmune disease characterized by metabolic destruction of pancreatic cells responsible for insulin production, with treatment based on replacing insulin. Long-acting insulin analogs are indicated for patients with DM1 who exhibit important oscillations of their daily glycemia, despite its higher cost. Our study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two long-acting insulins, insulin glargine and detemir, in treating patients with DM1. Methods: We undertook a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies (cohort and registry) available in the databases and the gray literature, and a complementary search in the Diabetes Care journal. Outcomes assessed were: glycated hemoglobin concentration; fasting plasma or capillary glucose; occurrence of episodes of severe hypoglycemia and occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycemia. The assessment of methodological quality was performed using the Newcastle score. The meta-analyses were performed on software Review Manager (R) 5.2. Results: Out of 705 publications, 8 cohort studies were included. The quality of these studies was classified as high. In the meta-analysis, results regarding episodes of severe hypoglycemia (p = 0.02) and fasting glucose (p = 0.01) were in favor of detemir. The glycated hemoglobin (p = 0.49; I-2 = 89) showed high heterogeneity and no statistically significant difference between the two. The meta-analysis of total insulin dose favored glargine (p = 0.006; I-2 = 75). The rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia (NH) were evaluated only for one study and showed a significant reduction of NH after therapy with detemir, (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Although some outcomes were favorable to detemir insulin analog, it has not been possible to identify important differences of effectiveness and safety between the two analogs. These results can help in the current debate on the inclusion of long-acting analogs on the list of reimbursed medicines in Brazil, especially with the recent introduction of an insulin glargine biosimilar at a considerably lower price.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 254
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness and safety of carbohydrate counting in the management of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vaz, Eliege Carolina
    Martiniano Porfirio, Gustavo Jose
    de Carvalho Nunes, Helio Rubens
    Nunes-Nogueira, Vania dos Santos
    ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2018, 62 (03): : 337 - 345
  • [32] Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Swinnen, Sanne G.
    Simon, Airin C. R.
    Holleman, Frits
    Hoekstra, Joost B.
    DeVries, J. Hans
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (07):
  • [33] Liraglutide as Adjunct to Insulin Treatment in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dimitrios, Patoulias
    Michael, Doumas
    Vasilios, Kotsis
    Konstantinos, Stavropoulos
    Konstantinos, Imprialos
    Ioanna, Zografou
    Konstantinos, Petidis
    Spyridon, Bakatselos
    Asterios, Karagiannis
    CURRENT DIABETES REVIEWS, 2020, 16 (04) : 313 - 326
  • [34] Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of the Safety of Insulin Glargine Compared with NPH Insulin
    Lepercq, Jacques
    Lin, Jay
    Hall, Gillian
    Dain, Marie-Paule
    Riddle, Matthew
    Home, Philip
    DIABETES, 2011, 60 : A259 - A260
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stamati, Athina
    Sotiriou, Georgia
    Karagiannis, Thomas
    Christoforidis, Athanasios
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2023, 25 (09): : 2770 - 2773
  • [36] Safety of Ramadan fasting in young patients with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Loh, Huai Heng
    Lim, Lee-Ling
    Loh, Huai Seng
    Yee, Anne
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2019, 10 (06) : 1490 - 1501
  • [37] Health economic comparisons between insulin glargine and insulin detemir in patients with type 1 diabetes on intensified insulin therapy: a systematic review
    Hagenmeyer, E. -G.
    Koltermann, K. C.
    Dippel, F. -W.
    Schaedlich, P. K.
    DIABETOLOGIE UND STOFFWECHSEL, 2011, 6 (06) : 377 - 384
  • [38] Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine versus placebo in patients with myotonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elettreby, Abdelrahman Mohammed
    Elnaga, Ahmed Abdullah Abo
    Alsaied, Mohamed Ahmed
    Ewis, Dalia Kamal
    Sharkawy, Aya Mohammed
    Fareed, Rahma
    Alderbi, Gehad Magdy
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 45 (08) : 3989 - 4001
  • [39] Insulin Degludec, a Novel Ultra-Long-Acting Basal Insulin versus Insulin Glargine for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Wenchuan
    Tao, Jinxin
    Zhou, Xiaodong
    Chen, Hongxia
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2019, 10 (03) : 835 - 852
  • [40] Insulin Degludec, a Novel Ultra-Long-Acting Basal Insulin versus Insulin Glargine for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wenchuan Zhou
    Jinxin Tao
    Xiaodong Zhou
    Hongxia Chen
    Diabetes Therapy, 2019, 10 : 835 - 852