Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine versus detemir analysis in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Silva, Thales B. C. [2 ,3 ]
Almeida, Paulo H. R. F. [2 ,3 ]
Araujo, Vania E. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Acurcio, Francisco de Assis [2 ,3 ]
Guerra Junior, Augusto A. [2 ,3 ]
Godman, Brian [1 ]
Alvares, Juliana [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Strathclyde Inst Pharm & Biomed Sci, Glasgow G4 0RE, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Fed Univ Minas Gerais UFMG, Sch Pharm, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Minas Gerais UFMG, SUS Collaborating Ctr Technol Assessment & Excell, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[4] PUCMG, Sch Dent, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
comparative effectiveness; detemir; diabetes mellitus type 1; glargine; systematic review; BASAL-BOLUS REGIMENS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; NPH INSULIN; OPEN-LABEL; FOLLOW-UP; MELLITUS; CHILDREN; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1177/2042018818781414
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) is an autoimmune disease characterized by metabolic destruction of pancreatic cells responsible for insulin production, with treatment based on replacing insulin. Long-acting insulin analogs are indicated for patients with DM1 who exhibit important oscillations of their daily glycemia, despite its higher cost. Our study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two long-acting insulins, insulin glargine and detemir, in treating patients with DM1. Methods: We undertook a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies (cohort and registry) available in the databases and the gray literature, and a complementary search in the Diabetes Care journal. Outcomes assessed were: glycated hemoglobin concentration; fasting plasma or capillary glucose; occurrence of episodes of severe hypoglycemia and occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycemia. The assessment of methodological quality was performed using the Newcastle score. The meta-analyses were performed on software Review Manager (R) 5.2. Results: Out of 705 publications, 8 cohort studies were included. The quality of these studies was classified as high. In the meta-analysis, results regarding episodes of severe hypoglycemia (p = 0.02) and fasting glucose (p = 0.01) were in favor of detemir. The glycated hemoglobin (p = 0.49; I-2 = 89) showed high heterogeneity and no statistically significant difference between the two. The meta-analysis of total insulin dose favored glargine (p = 0.006; I-2 = 75). The rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia (NH) were evaluated only for one study and showed a significant reduction of NH after therapy with detemir, (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Although some outcomes were favorable to detemir insulin analog, it has not been possible to identify important differences of effectiveness and safety between the two analogs. These results can help in the current debate on the inclusion of long-acting analogs on the list of reimbursed medicines in Brazil, especially with the recent introduction of an insulin glargine biosimilar at a considerably lower price.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 254
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety and efficacy of insulin detemir vs. insulin NPH in pregnant women with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fatima, Kaneez
    Siddiqi, Ahmed K.
    Shakil, Saad
    Akhtar, Sareema E.
    Quraishy, Maryam S.
    Siddiqui, Khadija
    Rafique, Esha
    Maniya, Muhammad T.
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 76 (06) : 578 - 589
  • [22] Safety and efficacy of insulin detemir vs. insulin NPH in pregnant women with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fatima, Kaneez
    Siddiqi, Ahmed K.
    Shakil, Saad
    Akhtar, Sareema E.
    Quraishy, Maryam S.
    Siddiqui, Khadija
    Rafique, Esha
    Maniya, Muhammad T.
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 76 (06) : 578 - 589
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus NPH for type I diabetes patients in an Italian setting. A meta-analysis
    Aristides, M.
    Kotchie, R.
    Nielsen, S.
    Aagren, M.
    Valentine, W. J.
    Goodall, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A260 - A260
  • [24] Basal Supplementation of Insulin Lispro Protamine Suspension Versus Insulin Glargine and Detemir for Type 2 Diabetes Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Esposito, Katherine
    Chiodini, Paolo
    Capuano, Annalisa
    Petrizzo, Michela
    Improta, Maria Rosaria
    Giugliano, Dario
    DIABETES CARE, 2012, 35 (12) : 2698 - 2705
  • [25] Safety and efficacy of insulin detemir versus NPH in the treatment of diabetes during pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Athanasiadou, Kleoniki, I
    Paschou, Stavroula A.
    Stamatopoulos, Theodosios
    Papakonstantinou, Evgenia
    Haidich, Anna-Bettina
    Goulis, Dimitrios G.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 190
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of oral insulin versus placebo for patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dharadhar, Saili
    Sharma, Amit
    Dey, Debasis
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 54 (04) : 244 - 252
  • [27] Clinical efficacy and safety of insulin glargine as compared to other insulin preparations in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wojciechowski, P.
    Rys, P.
    Rogoz-Sitek, A.
    Niesyczynski, G.
    Syta, A.
    Lis, J.
    Malecki, M. T.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2013, 56 : S419 - S419
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Jingxin
    Wang, Xiaomin
    Wu, Jingcheng
    Geng, Dandan
    Li, Fan
    Liu, Yang
    Shen, Yanhong
    ENDOCRINE, 2025,
  • [29] Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Simon, A. C. R.
    Swinnen, S. G.
    Holleman, F.
    Hoekstra, J. B. L.
    DeVries, J. H.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2011, 54 : S420 - S421
  • [30] Efficacy and Safety of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fan, Wenqi
    Deng, Chao
    Xu, Ruoyao
    Liu, Zhenqi
    Leslie, Richard David
    Zhou, Zhiguang
    Li, Xia
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2025, 49 (02) : 235 - 251