SENSITIVITY OF HYPERSPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS TO TRAINING SAMPLE SIZE

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Matthew A. [1 ]
Prasad, Saurabh [2 ]
Bruce, Lori Mann [1 ]
West, Terrance R. [1 ]
Reynolds, Daniel [3 ]
Irby, Trent [3 ]
Kalluri, Hemanth [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Geosyst Res Inst, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
Hyperspectral; Pattern Recognition; Information Fusion; Discrete Wavelet Transforms; TARGET RECOGNITION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Algorithms that exploit hyperspectral imagery often encounter problems related to the high dimensionality of the data, particularly when the amount of training data is limited. Recently, two algorithms were proposed to alleviate the small sample size problem one is based on employing a Multi-Classifier Decision Fusion (MCDF) in the raw reflectance domain, and the other employed the MCDF framework in the Discrete Wavelet Transform domain (DWT-MCDF). This paper investigates the sensitivity of conventional single classifier based classification approaches, as well as MCDF and DWT-MCDF to variations in the amount of data employed for training the classification system. The hyperspectral data in this experiment was obtained using an airborne hyperspectral imager used by SpecTIR (TM). The results of the experimental analysis show that for the given application, the MCDF and DWT-MCDF algorithms are significantly less sensitive than the conventional algorithms to limited training data. PCA consistently results in overall accuracies of about 35%. LDA accuracies are very high, about 75%, when there is an abundance of training data - about 10X (i.e. number of training samples is 10 times the number of spectral bands); remains above 60% for training data abundances of 2X and higher; but dramatically decreases to 20% for abundances of IX. MCDF results in accuracies ranging between 65% and 75% for training data abundance of 3X and higher, but the accuracies drop to 60% for 2X and similar to 55% for IX. DWT-MCDF results in high accuracies with the least sensitivity to training data abundance. Its accuracies range between similar to 60-65% for abundances of 1X to 10X.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PENALTY DRIVEN TRAINING SAMPLE REFINEMENT TECHNIQUE FOR HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES CLASSIFICATION USING ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION
    Sharma, Shakti
    IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2020, : 6953 - 6956
  • [32] Sample size algorithms in clinical trials
    Wu, Chien-Hua
    Won, Shu-Mei
    Yang, Yu-Chun
    Huang, Chiung-Yu
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2008, 42 (05): : 429 - 439
  • [33] Sample Size Algorithms in Clinical Trials
    Chien-Hua Wu
    Shu-Mei Wan
    Yu-Chun Yang
    Chiung-Yu Huang
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2008, 42 : 429 - 439
  • [34] Imbalanced sample feature enhancement of hyperspectral imagery classification
    Yu, Xumin
    Feng, Yan
    Gao, Yanlong
    2021 ASIA-PACIFIC SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING ASSOCIATION ANNUAL SUMMIT AND CONFERENCE (APSIPA ASC), 2021, : 93 - 99
  • [35] Hyperspectral data preprocessing to improve performance of classification algorithms
    Subramanian, S
    Gat, N
    Barhen, J
    IMAGING SPECTROMETRY III, 1997, 3118 : 232 - 240
  • [36] A COMPARISON OF ALGORITHMS FOR SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION USING HYPERSPECTRAL DATA
    Kuznetsov, A. V.
    Myasnikov, V. V.
    COMPUTER OPTICS, 2014, 38 (03) : 494 - 502
  • [37] Hyperspectral object tracking using small sample size
    Rosario, Dalton
    Kling, Henry
    ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY XVI, 2010, 7695
  • [38] Sample size planning for classification models
    Beleites, Claudia
    Neugebauer, Ute
    Bocklitz, Thomas
    Krafft, Christoph
    Popp, Juergen
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2013, 760 : 25 - 33
  • [39] DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZE IN CLASSIFICATION PROBLEMS
    VOLODIN, IN
    TEORIYA VEROYATNOSTEI I YEYE PRIMENIYA, 1974, 19 (03): : 658 - 659
  • [40] Simulation study of the effect of scene autocorrelation, training sample size and sampling method on classification accuracy
    Dobbertin, Matthias
    Biging, Gregory S.
    Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 1996, 22 (04): : 360 - 367