SENSITIVITY OF HYPERSPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS TO TRAINING SAMPLE SIZE

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Matthew A. [1 ]
Prasad, Saurabh [2 ]
Bruce, Lori Mann [1 ]
West, Terrance R. [1 ]
Reynolds, Daniel [3 ]
Irby, Trent [3 ]
Kalluri, Hemanth [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Geosyst Res Inst, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
Hyperspectral; Pattern Recognition; Information Fusion; Discrete Wavelet Transforms; TARGET RECOGNITION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Algorithms that exploit hyperspectral imagery often encounter problems related to the high dimensionality of the data, particularly when the amount of training data is limited. Recently, two algorithms were proposed to alleviate the small sample size problem one is based on employing a Multi-Classifier Decision Fusion (MCDF) in the raw reflectance domain, and the other employed the MCDF framework in the Discrete Wavelet Transform domain (DWT-MCDF). This paper investigates the sensitivity of conventional single classifier based classification approaches, as well as MCDF and DWT-MCDF to variations in the amount of data employed for training the classification system. The hyperspectral data in this experiment was obtained using an airborne hyperspectral imager used by SpecTIR (TM). The results of the experimental analysis show that for the given application, the MCDF and DWT-MCDF algorithms are significantly less sensitive than the conventional algorithms to limited training data. PCA consistently results in overall accuracies of about 35%. LDA accuracies are very high, about 75%, when there is an abundance of training data - about 10X (i.e. number of training samples is 10 times the number of spectral bands); remains above 60% for training data abundances of 2X and higher; but dramatically decreases to 20% for abundances of IX. MCDF results in accuracies ranging between 65% and 75% for training data abundance of 3X and higher, but the accuracies drop to 60% for 2X and similar to 55% for IX. DWT-MCDF results in high accuracies with the least sensitivity to training data abundance. Its accuracies range between similar to 60-65% for abundances of 1X to 10X.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ON THE SENSITIVITY OF SAMPLE-L MOMENTS TO SAMPLE-SIZE
    GUTTMAN, NB
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 1994, 7 (06) : 1026 - 1029
  • [42] Method of Sensitivity Analysis in Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Hyperspectral Images
    Messer, Adam J.
    Bauer, Kenneth W., Jr.
    ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY XXIII, 2017, 10198
  • [43] EFFECT OF INPUTS DECORRELATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF ADAPTIVE SPACE FILTERING ALGORITHMS WITH SMALL TRAINING SAMPLE-SIZE
    RATYNSKI, MV
    RADIOTEKHNIKA I ELEKTRONIKA, 1995, 40 (05): : 772 - 776
  • [44] Affinity propagation for large size hyperspectral image classification
    Soltani, Mariem
    Chehdi, Kacem
    Cariou, Claude
    IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING XIX, 2013, 8892
  • [45] Lightweight Relational Network for Small Sample Hyperspectral Image Classification
    Sun Y.
    Yu X.
    Tan X.
    Liu B.
    Gao K.
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2022, 47 (08): : 1336 - 1348
  • [46] Semisupervised Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Small Sample Sizes
    Aydemir, Muhammet Said
    Bilgin, Gokhan
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2017, 14 (05) : 621 - 625
  • [47] Multilabel Sample Augmentation-Based Hyperspectral Image Classification
    Hao, Qiaobo
    Li, Shutao
    Kang, Xudong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 58 (06): : 4263 - 4278
  • [48] Classification and anomaly detection algorithms for weak hyperspectral signal processing
    Lahaie, Pierre
    2016 8TH WORKSHOP ON HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING: EVOLUTION IN REMOTE SENSING (WHISPERS), 2016,
  • [49] An application of genetic algorithms on band selection for hyperspectral image classification
    Ma, JP
    Zheng, ZB
    Tong, QX
    Zheng, LF
    2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 2810 - 2813
  • [50] A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF FEATURE SELECTION ALGORITHMS IN HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
    Vijouyeh, Hamed G.
    Taskin, Gulsen
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 489 - 492